Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create a free account.

Absurdly, stupidly basic cooking questions (Part 2)


Recommended Posts

Posted
18 minutes ago, liuzhou said:

 

But boiling water never exceeds 100℃ at sea level or whatever temperature appertains a different altitudes. In any one place, there is no difference in temperature between a boil and a hard boil.

 

 

Exactly, once 100C is attained, any extra energy goes to the latent heat of vaporization....  So the more heat energy there is, the more violent the boil as there's more vaporization, but temp stays the same.

Posted
35 minutes ago, liuzhou said:

 

But boiling water never exceeds 100℃ at sea level or whatever temperature appertains a different altitudes. In any one place, there is no difference in temperature between a boil and a hard boil.

 

 

 

16 minutes ago, KennethT said:

Exactly, once 100C is attained, any extra energy goes to the latent heat of vaporization....  So the more heat energy there is, the more violent the boil as there's more vaporization, but temp stays the same.

 

This is true, but bubbles start to develop at lower temperatures. "Simmer" covers a much wider range of temperatures than I'd thought back then, and the observed, for-practical-cooking-purposes boil happens at slightly less than 100C. In addition, the viscosity affects boiling point when it isn't pure water. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Nancy Smith, aka "Smithy"
HosteG Forumsnsmith@egstaff.org

Follow us on social media! Facebook; instagram.com/egulletx

"Every day should be filled with something delicious, because life is too short not to spoil yourself. " -- Ling (with permission)
"There comes a time in every project when you have to shoot the engineer and start production." -- author unknown

Posted
12 minutes ago, blue_dolphin said:

This article has a pretty good boil vs simmer discussion.  

And what is the missing 7-degrees between simmering and boiling called and what would you cook at those temps?

 ... Shel


 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Shel_B said:

And what is the missing 7-degrees between simmering and boiling called and what would you cook at those temps?


It’s the Black Hole of Boiling.  Nothing should be cooked there! 🙃

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
5 minutes ago, blue_dolphin said:


It’s the Black Hole of Boiling.  Nothing should be cooked there! 🙃

Perhaps that explains why my poaching chicken thighs disappeared ....

  • Haha 3

 ... Shel


 

Posted
2 hours ago, Shel_B said:

And what is the missing 7-degrees between simmering and boiling called and what would you cook at those temps?

 

I postulate that that's the range of "low boil" as opposed to "full boil" or "rolling boil". I admit that so far I haven't found anything to support that terminology. However, Shirley Corriher in Cookwise notes that grain starches thicken at "just below the boiling point of water; can be held at this temperature without damage" (p. 275, First Edition, 1997) whereas root starches thicken at lower temperatures. The exact temperature depends on the exact starch, of course. My point here is that "just below the boiling point" may be that ill-defined 7-degree range.

  • Like 3

Nancy Smith, aka "Smithy"
HosteG Forumsnsmith@egstaff.org

Follow us on social media! Facebook; instagram.com/egulletx

"Every day should be filled with something delicious, because life is too short not to spoil yourself. " -- Ling (with permission)
"There comes a time in every project when you have to shoot the engineer and start production." -- author unknown

Posted
3 hours ago, Smithy said:

 

@Smithy  Your postulation was a very fine post.

  • Thanks 1

 ... Shel


 

  • 2 months later...
Posted

New question, though I've probably asked it before.

 

When one starts cooking dried beans (r.g. Ranco Gordo) is it necessary to bring the soaked beans to a hard boil* ? 

RG Green Baby Limas have been soaked for 6 hours.

 

 

*(except for Kidney beans which must boil for 10 minutes) 

 

@blue_dolphin ?

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, TdeV said:

When one starts cooking dried beans (r.g. Ranco Gordo) is it necessary to bring the soaked beans to a hard boil* ? 

RG Green Baby Limas have been soaked for 6 hours.

 

 

*(except for Kidney beans which must boil for 10 minutes) 


The reason for the 10 min boil for kidney beans (a fairly large family that includes cannellini) is to denature lectins like phytohaemagglutinin that can cause unpleasant nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. Slow cooker temps aren’t sufficient to denature them. Boiling does. 

 

Because I don’t know the lectin profile of every bean I cook nor do I know which lectins I might be sensitive to and I’d prefer to avoid those symptoms, I go ahead and start them all off with a 10 min boil.  I feel like it gets them moving about and off to a good start.  Or, in the words of Steve Sando, it lets them know who’s the boss 🙃.

 

If you prefer not boiling beans, don’t do it. I’m sure you can boss them about in other ways.

 

 

  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
Posted

I asked my butcher for turkey bones to make turkey stock and roasted them prior to making said stock.  I had a lot of them, and browned them after which they hit the pot along with some carrots, celery, onion.  Whenever I do this, I reduce it to a firm jelly like consistency and freeze it in ice cube trays.  This is the first time it's separated like this.  Both parts are equally firm.  What caused it to separate?  Do I need to rewarm it to blend the two parts back together prior to freezing?

20251014_080020.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, ElsieD said:

I asked my butcher for turkey bones to make turkey stock and roasted them prior to making said stock.  I had a lot of them, and browned them after which they hit the pot along with some carrots, celery, onion.  Whenever I do this, I reduce it to a firm jelly like consistency and freeze it in ice cube trays.  This is the first time it's separated like this.  Both parts are equally firm.  What caused it to separate?  Do I need to rewarm it to blend the two parts back together prior to freezing?

20251014_080020.jpg

 

Is that a layer of fat at the top? Did you have / use more fat than usual for this - for instance, more skin? If so, I'd be inclined to skim off the fat layer, keep it separate for flavor experiments (it might make fine schmaltz) and then save the lower layer in cubes as usual. If not, well, I'd still do a taste test for both layers before remixing.

  • Like 2

Nancy Smith, aka "Smithy"
HosteG Forumsnsmith@egstaff.org

Follow us on social media! Facebook; instagram.com/egulletx

"Every day should be filled with something delicious, because life is too short not to spoil yourself. " -- Ling (with permission)
"There comes a time in every project when you have to shoot the engineer and start production." -- author unknown

Posted

Well, now, I'm embarrassed.  That top layer is indeed fat.  I should have had a closer look before I asked my question.  When I first started cooking them up, I let it simmer for a few hours, temporarily removed the bones, chilled the broth and took the fat layer off.  Then the lot went back in again for further simmering.  For some reason I thought that did it for the fat.  Wrong.  So thank you, @Smithy and @rotuts for your replies.  I will be off shortly to pick up more bones and make some more.

  • Like 4
Posted

It certainly looks like fat. If there wasn't much skin attached to the bones, I'm wondering if it could somehow have leached out of the marrow.

  • Like 1

Imagine all the food you have eaten in your life and consider that you are simply some of that food, rearranged.  -Max Tegmark, physicist

 

Gene Weingarten, writing in the Washington Post about online news stories and the accompanying readers' comments: "I basically like 'comments,' though they can seem a little jarring: spit-flecked rants that are appended to a product that at least tries for a measure of objectivity and dignity. It's as though when you order a sirloin steak, it comes with a side of maggots."

 

No amount of belief makes something a fact.  -James Randi, magician and skeptic

Posted (edited)

@Alex

 

interesting point.

 

Not that long ago I looked into chicken marrow .  I found very little about it  @ web , some noise , of course

 

I was making CkStock out of legs .   I chopped a leg bone open , and tasted the marrow :

 

dry , mealy , metallic ( iron ? ) flavor.  what surprised me , no fatty flavors at all .

 

now of course Ckn's aren't Turks , so that might be different  

 

my guess is that fowl marrow is very different from beef ( mammalian ? ) marrow.

Edited by rotuts (log)
  • Like 1
Posted

@ElsieD

 

Wow .  lucky you .

 

BTW :  what was the price ?  I could not quite make out  the figures on the bottom necks :

 

2.18 lbs or Kg ?  for $CND 1.36 ?

 

do you iPot ? , its an easy way to concentrate the stock w/o boiling later by re-using the first batch , as the second

 

etc.

 

it takes time  but time thats unatended. i assume the packs w the skin side up are backs ?

 

turkey necks are rarely available in my area , and when they are , they are sold w veg for stock at a rather high price , over all.

Posted
11 minutes ago, rotuts said:

@ElsieD

 

Wow .  lucky you .

 

BTW :  what was the price ?  I could not quite make out  the figures on the bottom necks :

 

2.18 lbs or Kg ?  for $CND 1.36 ?

 

do you iPot ? , its an easy way to concentrate the stock w/o boiling later by re-using the first batch , as the second

 

etc.

 

it takes time  but time thats unatended. i assume the packs w the skin side up are backs ?

 

turkey necks are rarely available in my area , and when they are , they are sold w veg for stock at a rather high price , over all.

Right now I'm roasting the bones and will cook them up tomorrow.  The cost was $2.18 per kilo, or 99 cents a pound.  I got 19 pounds.  Maybe I should try using the IP.  How much do you do at a time?  Do you fill the pot with bones then fill with water to the MAX line?

Posted

@ElsieD

 

1) roast everything , get good color on all of the turkey.  dont worry about over roasting , its all going into stock.

 

2)  what size iPot are you using ?   Id divide what you have into 4 units .  add one unit into the iPot , and add water  if a 6 cup iPot

 

maybe 3 - 4 cups of water .  you do not have to cover the turkey .  HP 1 hour.  quick release  ( QR releases steam , a ' free-bee ' reduction

 

of water .   mash up the turkey , and remove the larger bones .  mash the meat up w a hand potato masher so its stringy ( more surface area )

 

iPot again for 20 - 30 mins.   squeeze out all of the stock from the meat.  I use a potato ricer.  be careful the stock hot .

 

then repeat w batch # 2 , etc.

 

this seems like a lot of work , but its unattended mostly .  the pressing of the meat is the most labor intensive part.

 

I done  this many times :

 

https://forums.egullet.org/topic/155098-instant-pot-multi-function-cooker-part-5/page/80/

 

 

May 23'd    and June 2    sept 14    might be other posts of mine in the iPot thread.

 

it takes a lot of time , total , so I do it on a day im inside anyway doing other things .  you only have something to do when the iPot beeps.

 

Ive learned to do quick-release ( carefully )  as the steam that comes out reduces hte water content of the stock , and saves time over all.

 

the potato ricer I got specifically for stock making , as before I pressed the jus out of the meat w the back of a ladle , which is a PITA.

 

keep an eye on the stock level after each iPot-ing  .  you might have to add water if you started out a bit low for 4 cycles .

 

each time Ive done this , the result ( after defatting when cold )  is a jell that a spoon can stand up in at room temp.

 

no boiling down.  the ipot does that for you.

 

if you use this method , consider not adding any seasonings for sure  but you might add roasted or not roasted

 

veg of you choice each or several times .

 

good luck .   I envy those turkey treasures .

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Thank you, @rotuts.  As mentioned, I'm browning the bones and will do stage 2 tomorrow unless i get ambitious today.  So, split the bones into 4 lots, put 1 lot in IP, add water, PC on high 1 hour, remove big bones, smash meat using potato masher, IP again 30 minutes, use (in my case) food mill to get the rest of the stock out of the meat.  In goes lot 2, re-using the liquid.  Have i got that right?  I have a 6 quart pot and a 3 quart pot.

Posted

@ElsieD

 

use the 6 qt.   you dont really need 30 min for the second part of each stage .  20 wold be fine .

 

consider 3 cups of water to start off with .  pls consider taking some pics .  you can see from my pics on the iPot thread how it goes.

 

there is a lot of meat that comes off those bones .  I hope the food mill works well.  i press the jus right over the iPot

 

each time .  did you see how much meat comes off a TurkeyBreast carcass ?

 

the procedure is very flexible , you get the idea .

 

good luck

  • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...