• Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create an account.

  • product-image-quickten.png.a40203b506711f7664fc62024e54a584.pngDid you know that these all-volunteer forums are operated by the 501(c)3 not-for-profit Society for Culinary Arts & Letters? This holiday season, consider a tax-deductible Quick Ten Bucks to support the eG Forums and help us remain completely advertising-free. Thanks to all those who have donated so far!

ElsieD

Eye of Round Roast - cooked sous vide

24 posts in this topic

I am planning to pick up an eye of round roast and cooking it sous vide. I have looked through previous posts but could only find a reference to bottom roast and that was posted in 2006. Has anyone cooked an eye of round sous vide? Is it worth the bother? I generally stay away from round anything as I find it to be pretty crappy meat. However, if it works I thought it might be okay for sandwiches.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I salted as per Cook's Illustrated - 1 tsp of kosher salt per pound to the trimmed eye of round. Let sit in vacuum bag for 24 hours. Then sous vide at 55 C for 24 to 26 hours. Took out and browned in my Big Green Egg.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Various cuts of meat from the same animal have very different flavors, cooked this way and that. Muscle that had to work during its life, seems to have more flavor, yet might be on the tough side.

SV, when properly understood, takes those tougher muscle groups and melts the connective tissue without over cooking the muscles them selves.

If you plan to study SV Beef: keep a small notebook: indeed with a sharpie note those details on the plastic itself.

'Eye of the Round' is a posterior meat with little flavor in itself compared to lets day shoulder. Thats not to say you cant have a nice SV experience. But how ever you cook your Beef, you cant add much flavor other than 'age-ing flavor'. But if you keep track of how you SV you will find out eventually a lot better way to cook any cut of beef so that 'on the plate' will be better than any other method.

unless you can afford and get "true aged prime cuts" you will have to open your wallet for these.

good luck! post a pic! we (I) love to learn from your work.

:biggrin:


Edited by rotuts (log)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I salted as per Cook's Illustrated - 1 tsp of kosher salt per pound to the trimmed eye of round. Let sit in vacuum bag for 24 hours. Then sous vide at 55 C for 24 to 26 hours. Took out and browned in my Big Green Egg.

Ummmm...Kerry....so how did it turn out? Would you do it again? Would you change anything? :-)

Thanks...

Todd in Chicago

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a promising result with a bare roast done sous vide and sliced very thin. But based on some similar experiments, I think the thing to do is ask your butcher to slice it paper thin and then take it home and portion it out in bags with a bit of salt and some beef stock/base. Then you can sous vide each portion individually as needed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I salted as per Cook's Illustrated - 1 tsp of kosher salt per pound to the trimmed eye of round. Let sit in vacuum bag for 24 hours. Then sous vide at 55 C for 24 to 26 hours. Took out and browned in my Big Green Egg.

Ummmm...Kerry....so how did it turn out? Would you do it again? Would you change anything? :-)

Thanks...

Todd in Chicago

Was very happy with the result - I know I've posted about it before - I seem to recall deciding that you can make a silk purse out of a sows ear.

Here you go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I picked up an eye of round roast today. It is Certified Angus Beef, although I don't know if that makes much difference over the regular supermarket variety. It does, however, have some visible marbling. So, I will follow Kerry's method and salt it using 1 teaspoon per pound and leaving it in the fridge in it's vacuum pack for 24 hours. I will then cook it sous vide for 24 or so hours, followed by a good browning. I'll post the result. Thanks for your help. IndyRobs method is intriguing as well. I may try that some other time.

Edited for spelling


Edited by ElsieD (log)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know some will disagree with me (the beauty of the subjectiveness of taste), but I personally find round beef flavourless and almost a pointless cut of beef to cook. This is not for a lack of good supplier/meat quality either... I have simply yet to try round cooked any way that has impressed me that could not be achieved with a more flavourful cut!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know some will disagree with me (the beauty of the subjectiveness of taste), but I personally find round beef flavourless and almost a pointless cut of beef to cook. This is not for a lack of good supplier/meat quality either... I have simply yet to try round cooked any way that has impressed me that could not be achieved with a more flavourful cut!

First, I'll agree that this cut is flavorless and seems to have limited potential. But to write it off completely based on your past experience discounts values that many cooks hold dear in themselves.

Is there any cut of beef that could not be improved by using a better cut? Only one, I would suggest, and it would probably be the full-on Kobe foodporn-steak at $120 per ounce.

If you have one of those, your biggest challenge is to 'do no harm'.

But if you have a normal cut of beef, the ingenuity in you must come out. We can add flavor and do things to reduce toughness. To stop at "This is not good enough" is not a chefly trait, IMHO.

There're salts and spices, herbs and acids, and meat glues, sous vide, etc. The possibilities are nearly infinite.

I don't mean to seem insulting, but if you say that a certain cut of beef is 'pointless to cook' then, I think, you've run out of ideas.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know some will disagree with me (the beauty of the subjectiveness of taste), but I personally find round beef flavourless and almost a pointless cut of beef to cook. This is not for a lack of good supplier/meat quality either... I have simply yet to try round cooked any way that has impressed me that could not be achieved with a more flavourful cut!

First, I'll agree that this cut is flavorless and seems to have limited potential. But to write it off completely based on your past experience discounts values that many cooks hold dear in themselves.

Is there any cut of beef that could not be improved by using a better cut? Only one, I would suggest, and it would probably be the full-on Kobe foodporn-steak at $120 per ounce.

If you have one of those, your biggest challenge is to 'do no harm'.

But if you have a normal cut of beef, the ingenuity in you must come out. We can add flavor and do things to reduce toughness. To stop at "This is not good enough" is not a chefly trait, IMHO.

There're salts and spices, herbs and acids, and meat glues, sous vide, etc. The possibilities are nearly infinite.

I don't mean to seem insulting, but if you say that a certain cut of beef is 'pointless to cook' then, I think, you've run out of ideas.

Fair call, and well said.

I suppose it does come down to my views... sous vide? Chuck or short ribs. Grilled? Ribeye or hanger or sirloin or strip. Grilled and thinly sliced? Skirt/Flank/rump. Braised? Chuck, blade, oxtail. Traditionally roasted? Fillet Smoked? Brisket Corned? Brisket. Soup? Tail. Lean? Tenderloin/flank/rump.

My view is that we are often looking for meat with more flavour (you see more and more complaints nowadays about beef "not having as much flavour as it used to"). Part of this is fat, part is the inherent flavour of the meat from muscle type, blood supply etc. To me at least, round lacks in both of these areas.


Edited by infernooo (log)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair call, and well said.

Thanks, but in the confines of this thread, it's about getting the best out of a specific, if suspect, cut of meat.

We can add flavor. We can add fat. We can add salt. We can add beef stock. But we can't change the cut of beef.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this cut might benefit from a higher SV temp until tender, then cut thin with a good flavored beef stock for 'French Dip' with some crusty sourdough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Has anyone cooked an eye of round sous vide? Is it worth the bother?

Yes, I've done it. No, it's not really worth doing. As others have said, eye round is not particularly flavorful. It's fine to cook SV to rare and use for roast beef sandwiches. But that's about the only thing I'd do with it. I suppose if you had some plan to do beef medallions heavily sauced, it might be worth doing as well. But I'd prefer to do that with a more flavorful cut. If you want to do eye round SV for roast beef, I'd consider doing things to increase the flavor. For example, you could thoroughly trim it, aggressively brown the trimmings, make a minor amount of broth with them and then put that in the bag while you're cooking the meat to get some more beefy umami in there. Or you could use a spice rub or something like that. Or you could brine it with something flavorful. Otherwise... meh.


Samuel Lloyd Kinsey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think eye of round makes great sandwich meat. I have followed Kerry Beal's formula and a couple of weeks ago I followed this recipe:

eye of round.jpg

Both work remarkably well to produce a tasty and reasonably tender hunk of beef. I like the high-heat method as it requires less pre-planning.


Anna Nielsen aka "Anna N"

...I just let people know about something I made for supper that they might enjoy, too. That's all it is. (Nigel Slater)

"Never call a stomach a tummy without good reason.” William Strunk Jr., The Elements of Style

Our 2012 (Kerry Beal and me) Blog

My 2004 eG Blog

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like this cut for corned beef because it is lean. I'll give it a load of flavor with the corning spices so the loss of fat flavor is not problem for me. Cooking SV x two days works great in this application.It ends up tender and flavorful and moist enough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I cooked the eye of round sous vide and I am amazed. It is tender, moist and has a surprising amount of flavour. I cut a few thin slices to try it out and we had to force ourselves to stop nibbling. I had been wanting to try this particular cut of beef cooked sous vide as I had heard good things about it and I am not disappointed. It will make wonderful roast beef sandwiches. I don't know that I would serve it as beef for a roast beef dinner as I don't know (yet) how tender it will be if it is cut more thickly. In any event, for the price I can see doing this again. It won't supplant my usual strip or hangar but it's darn good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just started to experiment with transglutinase (meat glue) and have been able to confirm that fat can be glued to meat. I've been using pork tenderloin filets with salt pork slices glued to the faces. It turns out that while the TG is working while compressed by the cryovac bag, there's a brining effect that equalizes the salt between the salt pork and meat (although that last bit doesn't relate to my point below).

So I think the next place to go is to get some fat (should be less expensive than the round) and slice the round down the grain into 'chopsticks'. Do the same with the fat (maybe toothpick-sized lardons), and layer up a well marbled 'tenderloin'. Compress that and let the TG work, and then slice steaks and cook them conventionally or SV.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Has anyone cooked an eye of round sous vide?

This is an eye of round slab cooked in a bag with a water bath. I don't recall the exact time and temp -- it was probably around 4 hours @ 60C. Obviously not the greatest cut but if kept rare and sliced thinly across the grain it's fine for sandwiches, etc.

pix 003.jpg

pix 006.jpg


Peter Gamble aka "Peter the eater"

I just made a cornish game hen with chestnut stuffing. . .

Would you believe a pigeon stuffed with spam? . . .

Would you believe a rat filled with cough drops?

Moe Sizlack

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PTE: Was 4 hours enough for tender? Even thin cut? and Im curious about the pebble-y look, haven't seen that before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did mine for 24 hours at 134F. It weighed about 2.5 pounds.


Edited by ElsieD (log)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Eye of Round really makes a superb deli style roast beef. Here's a link to one I posted about a while back: SV Deli Style Roast Beef


E. Nassar
Houston, TX

My Blog
contact: enassar(AT)gmail(DOT)com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting. What is the reason behind the 20 second dunk at 190F?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting. What is the reason behind the 20 second dunk at 190F?

Presumably to sterilize the outside.


PS: I am a guy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We recently SVed eye of rounds at 130F for 48 hours. just chopped rosemary, oil, truffle oil, and cracked black pepper. It was tender and delicious. It isn't the best cut of meat, but done this way it can stand up to more flavorful cuts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • By eG Forums Host
      Introduction

      Welcome to the index for the Sous Vide: Recipes, Techniques, & Equipment topic, one of the largest and most influential topics on eG Forums. (The topic has been closed to keep the index stable and reliable; you can find another general SV discussion topic here.) This index is intended to help you navigate the thousands of posts and discussions to make this rich resource more useful and accessible.

      In order to understand sous vide cooking, it's best to clear up some misconceptions and explain some basics. Sous vide cooking involves vacuum-sealing food in a plastic bag and cooking it in a water bath at precise temperatures. Though it translates literally as "under vacuum," "Sous vide" is often taken to mean "under pressure," which is a misnomer; not all SV cooking involves food cooked in conditions that exceed atmospheric pressure. (See below.) In addition, calculations for SV cooking involve not only time and temperature but also thickness. Finally, due to the anaerobic conditions inside the bag and the low temperatures used, food safety issues are paramount.

      You can read the basics of SV cooking and equipment here. In the summer of 2005, Nathan Myhrvold (Society member nathanm) posted this informative, "I'm now going to answer my own initial questions" post, which addresses just about everything up to that point. For what came next, read on -- and be sure to order Nathan Myhrvold's highly anticipated Modernist Cuisine book, due in spring 2011.

      As with all indexes of on-going discussions, this one has limitations. We've done our best to create a user-friendly taxonomy emphasizing the categories that have come up repeatedly. In addition, the science, technology, and recipes changed over time, and opinions varied greatly, so be sure to read updated information whenever possible.

      Therefore, we strongly encourage you to keep these issues in mind when reading the topic, and particularly when considering controversial topics related to food safety, doneness, delta T cooking, and so on. Don't read a first post's definitive claim without reading down the topic, where you'll likely find discussion, if not heated debate or refutation, of that claim. Links go to the first post in a series that may be discontinuous, so be sure to scan a bit more to get the full discussion.

      Recipes were chosen based solely on having a clear set of information, not on merit. Indeed, we've included several stated failures for reference. Where possible, recipes include temperature and time in the link label -- but remember that thickness is also a crucial variable in many SV preparations. (See below for more information on thickness.)

      History, Philosophy & Value of SV/LTLT Cooking

      Over the years, we've talked quite a bit about SV as a concept, starting with this discussion about how SV cooking got started. There have also been several people who asked, Why bother with SV in the first place? (See also this discussion.) What with all the electronics and plastic bags, we asked: Does SV food lack passion? Finally, there have been several discussions about the value of SV cooking in other eG Forums topics, such as the future of SV cooking, No More Sous Vide -- PLEASE!, is SV "real cooking," and what's the appeal of SV?

      Those who embrace SV initially seek ideas about the best applications for their new equipment. Discussions have focused on what a first SV meal should be -- see also this discussion -- and on the items for which SV/LTLT cooking is best suited. There's much more along those lines here, here, and here.

      Vacuums and Pressure in Sous Vide Cooking

      As mentioned above, there has been great confusion about vacuums, pressure, and their role SV cooking. Here is a selection of discussion points on the subject, arranged chronologically; please note that later posts in a given discussion may refute earlier ones:

      Do you need a vacuum for SV cooking, and, if so, why? What exactly is a "vacuum"? Click here, here, and ff. Are items in vacuum-sealed bags "under pressure"? Does a vacuum sealer create a vacuum inside the bag? Do you really need a vacuum, or can you use ZipLoc bags? Also see here, here, and here. If "sous vide" means "under pressure," aren't the items in the bag under pressure? There is more along these lines to be found in this discussion.  

      The Charts

      We've collected the most important of many charts in the SV topic here. Standing above the rest are Nathan Myhrvold's charts for cooking time versus thickness and desired core temperature. We worked with him to create these three reformatted protein tables, for beef, fish, and chicken & pork.

      Nathan provides additional information on his charts here. Information on how to read these charts can be found in this post. For an explanation of "rest time" in Nathan's tables, click here.

      Other Society members helped out as well. Douglas Baldwin references his heating time table for different geometric factors (slab/cylinder/sphere) here; the pdf itself can be found here. pounce created a post with all three tables as neatly formatted images. derekslager created two monospace font charts of Nathan's meat table and his fish table.

      Camano Chef created a cumulative chart with information gathered from other sources including Thomas Keller's Ad Hoc. Douglas Baldwin shared this chart devoted to pasteurizing poultry. PedroG detailed heat loss and steady state energy consumption of sous vide cookers in these charts.

      Finally, there is also an eG Forums topic on cooling rates that may be of interest.

      Acknowledgment & Comments

      This index was built by Chris Amirault, Director, eG Forums. It was reviewed by the eGullet Society volunteer team as well as many Society members. Please send questions or comments to Chris via messenger or email.
       
       
    • By TdeV
      Wikipedia defines pork wings as: a pork product made from the fibula of a pig's shank - a single bone surrounded by lean, tender meat.
      Images from the internet look like a finger-size bit of meat around a bone.
      Mine, however, look more like the meat (lots) which surrounds a bone. My butcher called this cut pork wings.
      You can see on the right that there's a small amount of bone.
         
       
      My butcher said he regularly ate SEVERAL of these. But this one measures 15 oz (425g).
      He also said it had to be cooked slowly.
       
      So, if I cook these sous vide, what temp and for how long?
    • By jedovaty
      Good morning!
       
      Long story short: I am doing a spin off the coconut/chocolate/almond candy (almond joy), and trying to create a specific shape out of the almond.  My hands are cramped after a couple dozen failed attempts whittling roasted almonds, so now I'd like to try a different approach, and instead, create some kind of sub-candy or cookie with roasted almonds that I can put into a mold or use a mini cookie cutter.  I'm fairly new to sweets, my knowledge in this area is pretty slim.  Some ideas so far, I don't like any, but it might help turn some gears:
      1. dusting almond over a stencil, but that's not enough almond nor crunchy enough
      2. almond brittle, but that's too hard and sweet, I'd like it more of a soft crunch, and bringing the almond flavor forward
      3. meringue with almonds (sort of macaron-ish), however, weather has been humid and raining here, and I'm ending up with a gooey mess instead of that soft crunch
       
      In addition to having almond-forward taste and soft crunch texture, it'd be fun to explore something modernish - I have a accumulated a few tools and ingredients not customarily found in homes.
       
      There are dietary considerations I will have to account for, however, no need to worry about that now, I am just looking for ideas and a place to take it from there
       
      Thank you for your time in reading!
    • By Franzisaurus_Rex
      FOOD BRETHREN!
      I need some advice. I have one last piece of pork belly confit in the fridge. I brined these bitches for about 5 days (brine included pink curing salt), vacuum sealed the squares of pork belly with lard and sous vide them at 158 F for 16 hours. I cooked this on 11/10/16 and its been in my refrigerator since. 
      Here is the general recipe I followed, with some modifications based on my taste: https://www.chefsteps.com/activities/...
      The last piece is still vacuum sealed and submerged (mostly) in lard. Any visible pork only has contact with the bag. 
      It's staring at me. And calling my name.
      I want to deep fry this sucker and have a little date night with the handsome devil I see in the mirror every morning, but the last thing I want is spoiled food. I can't find any conclusive information about how long pork confit lasts for. I've only seen references that duck confit or in general that the confit technique will last for months in the fridge. I have found no sources which directly addresses pork confit.
      Questions/Factors I'm Considering:
      - Does pork confit keep for as long as duck confit?
      - Does vacuum sealing have any effect on the length of preservation?
      - Does sous-vide cooking method affect the length of preservation?
      I know I am probably being a bit paranoid, but I thought I would do my due diligence before taking the plunge, so to speak. Any advice on these questions would be extremely helpful and appreciated!
      The Franzisaurus-Rex
      PS - you should totally make this if you are into sous vide, confit, food, or have any respect for the enjoyment of life. Flash-searing these things after cooking was OUT OF THIS WORLD.
    • By JoNorvelleWalker
      The NY Times has a current article in the science section "A Universe of Bubbles in Every Champagne Bottle".
       
      The article asserts that it is better to serve Champagne at warmer than refrigerator temperatures so that the bubbles are larger and convey more flavor.  Also to serve in a narrow glass.
       
      However Gerard Liger-Belair (who is referenced as an authority in the Times article) points out in his book Uncorked (forward by Herve This) that the colder the wine the more viscous and the more dissolved CO2.  Liger-Belair also prefers a goblet to a flute.  I bought Uncorked after reading about it in Liquid Intelligence from Dave Arnold.
       
      Discuss.
       
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.