Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create an account.

Lia Tumkus

Making salted caramel spread in a Thermomix

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone!

I was wondering if anybody have done salted caramel in the thermomix before. Sometimes I have to make it 4 times a day, and all the stirring is making me wonder if I can make it a little easier.

That's my recipe:

278g Cream

167g Glucose

176g Sugar

167g Milk

139g Butter

7,6g Fleur de Sel

7g Vanilla paste

So everything (except cream) goes to a pot, heat until 147C (stirring constantly!) and then I stir in the warm cream.

Does anybody knows if that would work in a thermomix???

I'll appreciate any inputs :D

Thanks guys!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.forumthermomix.com/index.php?topic=10660.0

The link above will take you to a recipe someone posted to the Australian Thermomix Forum site. If this doesn't help, you could do some scrolling through that site and seeing what you can find. I tried making fudge in the Thermomix last night and it came out quite soft. The taste was good so I can imagine cooking it for less time and having it as a sauce. Hope this helps a bit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm supposed to be stirring my sugar while it's coming up to temp/color? I give it a stir or two until things are melted and cooking and maybe a swirl or three once it starts coloring. Other than that, I don't do any stirring until the cream goes in. If I'm doing it wrong, I don't want to know... 'cause that time while the sugar is cooking is spent getting other things done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm thinking the stirring is because of the higher butter content in the recipe. You could try adding the butter AFTER you add the cream (and then stirring like crazy after each addition). That way you can get away with hardly stirring in your first step and the stirring you do is just to incorporate the butter.

Another idea would be to use a stick blender. Someone suggested that in the Jacques Genin caramel thread and I have been doing it ever since. My stick blender has several speeds and I use the low one. Sure saves the arm...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I melt the butter in the cream when I heat it and add them together.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was unable to get my caramel up to 121 C in the thermomix.

that was my first thought - I don't think the unit will heat that high.

I'd also be concerned about it sticking to the bottom, as I've had things stick in mine quite often, even though it's mixing all the time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rumour has it the Hotmix pro will achieve the higher temperatures. Sadly only 240V.

Apparently it goes up to 190º C - the newest model - the Easy will go to 130º C and might be 120V if it comes to north america.


Edited by Kerry Beal (log)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cool guys! Thank you so much for the ideas and discussion... I'll give it a go changing my cooking method, adding the butter to the cream and all.

Hotmix pro sounds great! But I have no idea if I'm able to buy living in Brazil, and how much it cost... :P

Thanks again!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rumour has it the Hotmix pro will achieve the higher temperatures. Sadly only 240V.

Apparently it goes up to 190º C - the newest model - the Easy will go to 130º C and might be 120V if it comes to north america.

Kerry... do we need a new toy? I think we might! I would love a machine with the capability to make caramel. I use a lot of butter in my caramels so need to do a lot of stirring. The Hotmix Pro increases in temp. 1 degree at a time. It's the perfect caramel making tool!

I haven't done a lot of research but found these technical specs that state that the Gastro IS available in 110V.

I won't be running out to buy it tomorrow but it's definitely on my wish list (she says massaging her poor sore neck from too much stirring....)

http://www.hotmixpro.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=385&Itemid=105〈=en

Thanks for pointing out this machine!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rumour has it the Hotmix pro will achieve the higher temperatures. Sadly only 240V.

Apparently it goes up to 190º C - the newest model - the Easy will go to 130º C and might be 120V if it comes to north america.

Kerry... do we need a new toy? I think we might! I would love a machine with the capability to make caramel. I use a lot of butter in my caramels so need to do a lot of stirring. The Hotmix Pro increases in temp. 1 degree at a time. It's the perfect caramel making tool!

I haven't done a lot of research but found these technical specs that state that the Gastro IS available in 110V.

I won't be running out to buy it tomorrow but it's definitely on my wish list (she says massaging her poor sore neck from too much stirring....)

http://www.hotmixpro...mid=105〈=en

Thanks for pointing out this machine!

Of course we do! Of course I want the Creative that heats and cools.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course we do! Of course I want the Creative that heats and cools.

Of course you want the Creative! That would be an amazing machine. I was pretty excited about this machine but had an 'oh no' yesterday as I was daydreaming about it... The caramels I make have sodium bicarbonate in them (see the Jacques Genin caramels thread) and they froth up A LOT as they are cooked. I don't think that little 2L bowl could handle a recipe for a frame of caramels. I think the baking soda plays a few roles in that recipe but the most important one I would think is the boost in the Maillard reaction as the caramels cook. I wouldn't want to omit it. Boo Hoo!!

When you get your machine I'll get you to try out those caramels to see if the machine can handle it. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah - but if you crank up the RPM's when you put in the bicarb it might keep it under control.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah - but if you crank up the RPM's when you put in the bicarb it might keep it under control.

I think you're right Kerry! You've just turned my Boo Hoo into a Woo Hoo. :smile:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • By pastrygirl
      If so, what was it like?  Sounds similar to kouign-aman ... https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-north-east-orkney-shetland-44486529
       
       
    • By highchef
      we're all used to the Wednesday/Sunday food sections of newspapers far and wide, national and local. I see corrections in the local or regional columns when called for, but there's never a way to critique the ones published on a national scale because the content is behind a paywall. I get the WSJ, but don't want to pay additional (I should get access to it all on line for free-the newspaper is not cheap) for their online edition. Very frustrating to try a recipe and have major problems with it and not be able to point out some serious issues. Specifically, the WSJ published a recipe from Dee Retalli, a pastry chef in London who's recipe is in the cookbook 'Rustic' by Jorge Fernandez and Rich Wells. 
      I have made this cake 3 times.
      First time was a total runover disaster, which I should have foreseen. This cakes calls for a 10" springform or if you don't have that, a 10" cast iron skillet. I went for the latter because that is what I had. Almond mixtures tend to really smoke when they run over, just so you know.
      Tried again later with a deeper than normal 9 " springform. Happened again. Think it has to do with the 2 teaspoons of baking powder and quick activation in a 350º oven.
      Invested in a 10" springform for '3rd times a charm' try. I was successful, but not because I followed the directions, rather I became a little obsessed with making this work. Checked my oven, followed with the recipe and eyed it warily. It came up to the brim...and stayed. 45 minutes later it was supposed to be done but while it was beautiful, it was a bowl of jello in the center. It was also browning at an alarming rate- the almond flour again? So I placed a sheet of tinfoil over it (beautiful top crust) and turned the oven down to 325º and carefully watched and tested for almost another hour. That's a big time difference. 
      I found the recipe on cooked.com - credited to the above authors and cookbook albeit in Euro style measures and temps. All seems the same, so what are the odds that the recipe was misprinted twice from 2 different media?
      All I can think of is somewhere down the line (in the cookbook itself?) the cook time and temp were off. The time on both reads 45 min. The recipe took at least 1hr and 45 minutes. methinks someone left out the hour...
      The temp. thing is a little more obvious. Celcius to farenheight 350ºF does not equal 180ºC, more like 176ºC. Over almost 2 hours, I think that could make the difference between cooked and burnt? Sooo, I turned it down when I saw how fast it was browning to 325.
      The cake stays in form while you pour the honey over it, then orange water, then 2(!!!) cups of sliced toasted almonds. I put 1 cup and there is no way another cup would have stayed on that cake. I cup settled up to almost an inch on a 10" cake...
      Has anyone else tried this recipe or have the cookbook? It's a wonderful cake if you correct the time and temp., But I'd be really curious to see if anyone followed it exactly as written with success?
       
    • By Longblades
      How much minute tapioca do you use to thicken pie fillings? I read through every one of the rhubarb pie posts and no, the recommended amount is NOT on the box I just purchased.
      I will be making rhubarb pie but also apple, sour cherry, raspberry and blueberry later in the season. I will freeze most of the pies, unbaked, but would appreciate knowing what amounts you use for immediate baking as well. Also, I will be using tinfoil pie plates that say they are 10" but I think are really more like 9 inchers. They certainly do not hold anywhere near as much as my 10" pyrex pie plate.
      I tried tapicoa years and years ago and decided I preferred flour but my sister now has a gluten allergy so I'm going to try tapioca again. That way she can at least scrape out the filling and eat it. Can I just substitute equal amounts of minute tapioca for the flour?
      My method with the flour has been to mix it with the sugar and sprinkle some on the bottom crust, then a layer of fresh fruit. then a sprinkle of flour/sugar, with usually only two of three layers of fruit and finishing with a sprinkle of the flour/sugar. Can I do that with the tapioca?
      Oh, and strawberries in the rhubarb pie? No way, DH would kill me. Rhubarb is his favourite and he says strawberries contaminate a rhubarb pie.
    • By pastrygirl
      Cake construction question - I have a wedding cake order next month for about 175 people.  I think it's going to be 14" round, 12" round, double-height 9" round, and a separated 6" layer with her great-grandma's cake topper.
       
      My question is about the double-height layer.  Should I layer cake and filling as usual  but just make it super tall, or will whomever has to cut the thing appreciate it if there's a goo-free zone of cake-cardboard-cake in the middle so they can separate it into 2 x 9" cakes or more easily cut it?  I mean, I could make two regular layers with 5 layers of cake and 4 layers of filling, not frost the top of one and just stack the other on top, or I could make one giant cake with 10 layers of cake, 9 filling, and no cardboard in the middle.  I almost never have to cut cakes so I don't know if it matters but I thought I'd ask.  The filling will either be salty caramel or raspberry, and the icing will be meringue buttercream, not as sturdy to handle as a crusting icing or fondant.
       
      Or any other tips on giant wedding cakes?  Thanks!
    • By WhiskerBiscuit
      I’m using this recipe to try and make a perfect rice pudding.
       
      Ingredients:
       
      1-2 Tbsp medium-grain white rice, such as arborio (often called risotto rice), calriso, or another california-grown rice--do not wash! 2/3 c additional long-grain or short-grain rice to make 2/3 cups rice total 4 c milk (skim, 1%, 2%, whole, or a combination) 1/3-1/2 c sugar, to taste 1 tsp pure vanilla extract   Recipe:   Place the rice and milk in the rice cooker bowl; stir to combine. Close the cover and set for the Porridge cycle. When the machine switches to the Keep Warm cycle, open the rice cooker, and add the sugar and vanilla, quickly stirring it into the rice milk mixture. Stir until combined. Close the cover and reset for a second Porridge cycle. Stir every 15 to 20 minutes until the desired consistency is reached. Warning: cooking the sugar for more than about 1/2-hour makes the pudding difficult to clean from the rice cooker bowl, so don't add sugar at the beginning of cooking (although the rice pudding comes out fine)! Rice mixture will thicken as it cools. If it comes out too thick, just add more milk.    I initially tried it out using all arborio rice (because that’s all I head on hand), but as the recipe noted it came out too starchy.  However it was really good, but not what I was looking for.  The second time I used the suggested rice mixture.  But looking at other recipes and Kozy Shack’s ingredient list, I decided to add a couple of egg yolks.  At the end of the second porridge cycle (total cooking time 90 minutes) I added two coddled egg yolks (I almost pasteurized them with my sous vide, but that was a little overboard even for me).  The texture was a little too thick, so I added a tablespoon or so of milk and then thought it was too thin so I kept with the porridge cycle.  I checked about 15 minutes later and my thick porridge all of a sudden became a liquid soup.  I kept cooking and after an hour it reduced to the thickness I wanted, but the rice broke almost completely down.  What I want to know is what happened to make it go from a thick porridge to soup in a very short amount of time.  Was it adding the egg yolks?  There has got to be some science-y reason behind it.    
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×