Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create a free account.

"flexitarians" ... what's in a name?


Recommended Posts

article from the Cincinnati Post

the American Dialect Society, which gave the term flexitarian -- used to describe meat-eating vegetarians -- its top honor for most useful word of 2003.

Flexitarians adhere mostly to the vegetarian diet as a healthy lifestyle rather than following an ideology. They feel an occasional meal that includes fish, fowl or meat is acceptable...... flexitarians could be estimated as high as 40 percent of the American population says the Vegetarian Resource Group.

related article on the concept

So are you a flexitarian? Know one or more? :rolleyes:

Think the entire terminology thing is completely bizarre? :laugh:

Do we actually have to have "labels" for everyone now? :blink:

Melissa Goodman aka "Gifted Gourmet"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also usually call this "Picky pain in the ass who I don't want to be sharing my table with"

Jason Perlow, Co-Founder eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters

Foodies who Review South Florida (Facebook) | offthebroiler.com - Food Blog (archived) | View my food photos on Instagram

Twittter: @jperlow | Mastodon @jperlow@journa.host

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah... I know a few people who might be called "break for steak" vegetarians...

And people who insist only on eating "happy meat" from beasts who are known to have lived a cruelty free life... which necessitates a mostly vegetarian diet.

Edited by cdh (log)

Christopher D. Holst aka "cdh"

Learn to brew beer with my eGCI course

Chris Holst, Attorney-at-Lunch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not a English teacher, but does not the word vegetarian mean a person who lives on a meatless diet, are we loosing or minds to create new words like flexitarian, wow it was probably created by a marketing firm to target the confused world of trendy eaters, I do not think they know what the hell they want.

Also you have the Macro-Biotic world which allows this trend to occur, humans have different dietary needs depending on the season or health reasons; this system allows you adapt to what the body needs and allows for adjustments depending on the person, all our needs are different so is our diets.

Cook To Live; Live To Cook
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate all these semantic contortions. So-called vegetarians who eat some measure of meat are just trying to benefit from the appearance of spiritual and moral purity the term imbues. Can't they just say, "I don't eat red meat?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems folks here are being unnecessarily hard on vegetarians-

"Pains in the asses" etc. etc.

I happen to be one who you might consider a "flexitarian" although I find the label silly and pointless to the extreme.

Generally, I eat a vegetarian diet. My tummy feels better if I limit my meat and dairy-that is the long and short of it. And yet, sometimes I feel the need for that extra dose of iron and protein that meat provides, so on those occassions I have some. My food choices are made by what makes me feel good when and after I eat it, not for any religious or ideological reasons.

Granted there are some people out there who decide to be vegetarian to give themselves some sort of distinction that they otherwise would not have, but I believe these are the exceptions to the rule.

But, "flexitarian?" When would you ever need to use this word?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My understanding..as dim as my bulb is...

Vegetarian...NO, NO meat. Period. No exceptions for the freak-shows.

Lacto-Ovo-Vegetarian- NO, NO meat. Period. Eggs/dairy ONLY.

Vegan- NO, NO animal products WHATSOEVER. Including honey and leather products. The folks who don't want animal meat in their life, at ALL, are perfectly fine by me.

The folks who want to eat 'happy' animals that roam 'free'....unless you raise the beast and kill it yourself (or hire a gent/gal) this trust could very well be misplaced unless you visit the farm. -sigh-

Myself, I feel like a yo-yo..

I dislike labels. I often wish that I could at least be given the opportunity to raise a pig, cow, chickens, ducks, geese etc and the responsibility to kill and dress them.

Shelley: Would you like some pie?

Gordon: MASSIVE, MASSIVE QUANTITIES AND A GLASS OF WATER, SWEETHEART. MY SOCKS ARE ON FIRE.

Twin Peaks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pyewacket, I would simply call you (and others who would fall under this "flexitarian" label) as an omnivore who eats a diet that includes, but does not necessarily feature, meat and other animal products. This would include many traditional dietary practices, such as the pre-20th century Italian peasant diet, for example.

--

Link to comment
Share on other sites

of course, it's worth noting that the american dialectic society came up with this label...not some roving band of flesh dabblers. but i don't understand the venom. am i picky, and therefore not worthy of sharing your table because the dialectic people named me, or because i eat more vegetables than meat?

from overheard in new york:

Kid #1: Paper beats rock. BAM! Your rock is blowed up!

Kid #2: "Bam" doesn't blow up, "bam" makes it spicy. Now I got a SPICY ROCK! You can't defeat that!

--6 Train

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you'd be surprised how many people order whole fish in my restaurant with a "do not present--vegetarian" note on the dupe.

fish are not vegetables.....flexitarian or not!

i'm not really clear on the necessity of a label for every type of eating style/diet known to man. i don't like eggplant tremendously, though i will eat it...does thois make me an antidisegplantarianist or something???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know quite a few people who were once vegetarian (usually in their teenage years for semi-ethical, semi-food-issues reasons), and who now eat meat, but who won't eat large or obviously meaty-tasting pieces of meat. I find this pretty odd, but I suppose it's not inherently much odder than people who won't eat bugs or whole fish - they've conditioned themselves to be repulsed by eating meat, but don't mind as long as they don't think about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reminds me of a great quote from a Kenneth Branagh film called Dead Again In it, Branagh is telling someone (played by Robyn Williams) about how he's trying to quit smoking. The other character replies: "Quitting's for pussies. You're either a smoker, or a non-smoker. Figure out who you are, and be it."

I choose to eat red meat no more than twice a month. If you need to label me, you can call me Arne. :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

of course, it's worth noting that the american dialectic society came up with this label...not some roving band of flesh dabblers.  but i don't understand the venom. am i picky, and therefore not worthy of sharing your table because the dialectic people named me, or because i eat more vegetables than meat?

reesek, I'm pretty sure that the fellows that expressed those feelings about sharing the table were joking. If you notice their other posts, they uh, sort of have a tendency towards humor...and this subject, this particular word, certainly leads one right into the land of silliness, doesn't it?

That the humor was addressed in this way might be understood if one takes a look at the other side of the coin. Many non-vegetarians have been treated time and again to a 'holier-than-thou' attitude from vegetarians.

Even different sorts of vegetarians are treated in this manner by each other sometimes...guess it is just human nature.

Love that line of yours... 'roving band of flesh dabblers'... maybe it should be you working for the Dialectic people rather than whoever is now... :hmmm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

of course, it's worth noting that the american dialectic society came up with this label...not some roving band of flesh dabblers.  but i don't understand the venom. am i picky, and therefore not worthy of sharing your table because the dialectic people named me, or because i eat more vegetables than meat?

The American Dialect (not "dialectic") Society didn't come up with the word, they just honored it at their annual meeting. The American Dialect Society is an academic society dedicated to the study of dialects of English in North America -- they observe colloquial American English, they don't make it up.

Every year, members make nominations and then vote for "Word of the Year," which is supposed to represent the most characteristic or dominant new(ish) word in the national discourse that year. Honors like "most useful" are sort of runner-up things, along the lines of "Miss Congeniality" crossed with the kind of thing that would be voted on for mention in a high-school yearbook.

"went together easy, but I did not like the taste of the bacon and orange tang together"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I once was (very) briefly engaged to a young lady who was a strict vegetarian. That is, no Worchestershire sauce, etc. because of the anchovies etc. I'd guess you'd definitely have to say she was an ethical vegetarian. But somethimes her apetites overode her ethics. We would be sitting there nicely eating our lunch, her salad on bread, my steak and cheese. Then she would suddenly look at me guiltily and tell me how good my sandwich smelled. She would just stare at it, like a cat before a mouse. Then if a scrap of steak were to fall from my sandwich and I were to turn my back, the scrap would disappear.

I should have taken a hint. Our relationship was long distance and food was not the only area where appetites overode ethics.

Edited by donk79 (log)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The American Dialect (not "dialectic") Society didn't come up with the word, they just honored it at their annual meeting. The American Dialect Society is an academic society dedicated to the study of dialects of English in North America -- they observe colloquial American English, they don't make it up.

Every year, members make nominations and then vote for "Word of the Year," which is supposed to represent the most characteristic or dominant new(ish) word in the national discourse that year. Honors like "most useful" are sort of runner-up things, along the lines of "Miss Congeniality" crossed with the kind of thing that would be voted on for mention in a high-school yearbook.

Hmm. I stand corrected, too, in following stream of consciousness use of words in repetition of another person's use...right smack into the wrong word!

If it was the Dialectic Society their purpose would be to arrive at the truth through exchange of logical arguments...no?

They would be discussing at length whether there actually was a thing such as a Flexitarian rather than just saying that is the common name being used for the thing.

But here is another question: Has anyone in this food and word-wise group ever previously heard of this word in general use?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...