I know nothing about growing grapes or log homes, but I do know a lot about science. When you have multiple variables in an experiment, but study only one, then you have an experiment guaranteed to give uninterpretable results. There may be something to the lunar stuff, but whether trout feeding periods or log homes, I've never seen a truly well designed study of a lunar influence on anything but tides. So who knows what's actually true? Natural wine sounds like it would have a philosophical appeal to some, but turning back to clock to less well-controlled conditions almost guarantees a less reproducible product. If unreliable and often inferior results are worth the philosophical advantage then it might be a viable product. But I doubt it.