gfweb

A thing from Lebanon. Really foul. Had a fancy French-y label, but tasted like asphalt with a hint of napalm. Chateau Arafat or something like that. edit for clarity

If you add jalapeno to the tuna salad, the potato chips make even more sense.

This thread is like Seinfeld. You dont know what it is about. Having said that, I will second adding potato chips (Herr's Ripple Chips) to tuna salad sandwiches. They add a crunch that would otherwise be provided by the empty nutrition of lettuce. An upgrade.

How do you plate dog food? I once had a sweet and gentle natured Airedale, but when I put her food bowl down, I had to get my hand out of the way very fast. Some years later I had a female Boston Terrier who savored her Jerky Treats. She'd hold it upright between her paws, and take a bite, and chew it slowly;she was a slow food advocate. The problem was her mate, my male Boston Terrier would be hovering around her waiting for an opportunity to snatch the Jerky Treat. I speak as an Airedale who savors his food, but I'd rather play than eat. You are right about small portions getting cold fast. I had a nice meal at Lacriox pretty much ruined that way. Artsy -fartsy plating of small portions = cold in minutes.

I'd also pan fry the meatloaf to get it crusty.

Agreed. That's just wrong. Agreed about the mayo too.

We did this with our kids and they were quickly civilized. Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2

One or two flashes...no big deal. But repeated flash shots are annoying and selfish.

Lebanon bologna! Smokey and wonderful. Like summer sausage, but better. I love it pan fried and then put in a pumpernickel sandwich with cole slaw. Weaver's is the best, then Kunzler's.

For the full Philly you gotta have a Wawa Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2

Great stuff! Wish I were there.

I've been several times and Primanti's remains a mystery to me. I think one must be drunk or otherwise impaired to appreciate their stuff.

Rather than start a new thread, I'll bump this one.... We ate at Lacroix tonight. The last time I was there I think Lacroix himself was in the kitchen. So its been a while. The meal was really disappointing. I really think that how the dish looks is more important to the kitchen than how it eats. The portions were skimpy and most dishes were fussily composed with flowers and dribs and dabs of sauces dotted on the plate...not enough to actually use for more than one bite, perhaps they are there more for how they sound when described by the waiter. The food that was there was tasty, though it cooled quickly sitting all alone near the dots of sauces. Desserts were playful (oh noooo) takes on chocolate cake and cheesecake among other standards. The cheesecake, for example,consisted of balls of mascarpone covered in white chocolate with a purple schmear of blueberry stuff. Pretty to look at, but awkward eating and not that good. Throughout dinner, my grown son looked longingly at the people eating hot burgers, crabcakes and pomme frite at the bar. Me too.

My guess would be that they were always this bad. I think they all started up away from the pizza belt, where standards are lower. Or perhaps just identified a price point for a market that wasn't buying "real " pizza anyway.

I like menus with limited bullshit. Adjectives are fine if they describe how its cooked eg sauteed carrots. Succulent carrots would be a violation.

This issue is just like many many others in science and medicine. We have a bunch of suggestive studies that are far from conclusive in animals and the choice of acting on partial information or waiting till conclusive human studies appear. Doctors deal with this daily. A great illustration is whether antioxidants do anything of value. There are the sort of lab studies that Dr Oz loves which suggest benefits in cultured cells but there are no reliable studies that i know of showing benefit in man. In fact the big well done human studies show either no benefit or increased cardiac risk for vit C and E. Is that the last word? Nope What's my point? It is that knowledge evolves. No one paper or group of papers gives the whole story. And the conclusions will change as more science is done. Everyone gets to choose what evidence they base decisions on but it is really wrong to attack the motives of those who disagree. Often those who say that more data is needed are the ones proven right. As far as FDA being in industry's pocket, that couldn't be farther from the truth. If anything they are hostile to industry and limited only by their funding and mandate from Congress.

My peaches are a little small this year but very sweet.

His dog is well fed.

I'm out of town. Sadly.

Kenji Alt is great at this stuff.

Costco has great pork shoulder usually. Mostly usable meat. Good price.

I've been following and pondering. It seems to me that it is not the high end that is over-priced, but the low-end restaurants. To use a US example, I can have a mediocre dinner for two with drinks and vile wine at Ruby Tuesday (a low-end chain with some pretentions) for about $90. Dinner at an average top line place in Philadelphia would be $200 to 250ish (assuming that we didn't go nuts on wines). The $90 spent on Ruby T would be just a waste. Crappy food, served by a knucklehead, no memories of the meal...why am I eating here? The $250 meal would be just the opposite and way more than 3-4 times better. So why are so many patrons pouring money into crummy restaurants?

Corn is pretty ratty looking in SE Penna.

Or gamma ray. Safe as well.

RE the unsatisfactory chicken breast texture post sous vide ..I've found that more than just a pinch of salt gives a slightly rubbery texture.