Off course. And I'm not the one clamoring for fois gras in my freakin' grits. ← I don't think grits need fois gras, but I certainly wouldn't turn my nose up at fois gras infused grits were they offered. ← At least not until you've tasted it. Actually, foie gras, confit and polenta (nothing but a form of grits) is an excellent combination and not all that creative at this point. Although the show, in it's attempt to be exciting and entertaining does award points for creativity, taste is still worth twice as much. Thus a chef would be at a disadvantage if he wasn't creative, but at a greater disadvantage if he was creative but his food didn't please the judges' palates. The issue here is the greater one of online discussions and the twisting of what's been said by others. A comment by a professional, that a ten ingredient grits would have been better had it been simpler, that included the suggestion of foie gras and duck confit as a simpler combination, has been turned into "clamoring" for foie gras by another user and allowed to shift the focus by making a constructive suggestion appear to be one that was limiting in a negative way. Unless evidence exists of a clamoring for foie gras, a reaction to such clamoring is not germane to this thread. ← Coming from another professional, fois gras and duck confit grits would not be better however. In fact, when served with his other southwestern-style dishes, it would taste like rubbish. I am reacting to the poster's knee-jerk reaction to my opinion that this grits looked great, and I am sticking to that. His grits are a great step up from the classic "add fois gras to anything and it will taste good" school of thinking. And I think that his suggestion of adding fois gras to grits reeks of food condescension and French elitism. Here's the original quote I responded to. Maybe it's not condescending, but the phrase "step into teh [sic] world of fine dining" followed immediately by a suggestion of adding a luxury ingredient certainly gave me that impression.