Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create a free account.

Edit History

scott123

scott123

1 hour ago, chromedome said:

Why, the usual confrontation of tradition vs. innovation, of course. What else?

 

I am not anti-innovation.  As I said before, I pioneered poydextrose for the home baker.  I pioneered steel plate for pizza.  I'm as pro innovation, pro science as you can get.  You can fall in love with a regional delicacy and have a desire to preserve it for future generations by clearly defining it while still pursuing progress.  The two are not mutually exclusive. 

 

Open source software authors get this.  If you have what you believe to be an improvement in a piece of software, but the rest of the team isn't in agreement, you create a fork.  The fork then stands as a separate entity, and succeeds or fails on it's own merits.  Neither tradition nor innovation are integral to this process.  It's just a matter of "this is something different, we're calling it something else.:"

scott123

scott123

1 hour ago, chromedome said:

Why, the usual confrontation of tradition vs. innovation, of course. What else?

 

I am not anti-innovation.  As I said before, I pioneered poydextrose for the home baker.  I pioneered steel plate for pizza.  I'm as pro innovation, pro science as you can get.  You can fall in love with a regional delicacy and have a desire to preserve it for future generations by clearly defining it while still pursuing progress.  The two are not mutually exclusive. 

 

Open source software authors get this.  If you have what you believe to be an improvement in a piece of software, but the rest of the team isn't in agreement, you create a fork.  The fork then stands as a separate entity, and succeeds or fails on it's own merits.  Neither tradition nor innovation play any role in this process.  It's just a matter of "this is something different, we're calling it something else.:"

scott123

scott123

53 minutes ago, chromedome said:

Why, the usual confrontation of tradition vs. innovation, of course. What else?

 

I am not anti-innovation.  As I said before, I pioneered poydextrose ifor the home baker.  I pioneered steel plate for pizza.  I'm as pro innovation, pro science as you can get.  You can fall in love with a regional delicacy and have a desire to preserve it for future generations by clearly defining it while still pursuing progress.  The two are not mutually exclusive. 

 

Open source software authors get this.  If you have what you believe to be an improvement in a piece of software, but the rest of the team isn't in agreement, you create a fork.  The fork then stands as a separate entity, and succeeds or fails on it's own merits.  Neither tradition nor innovation play any role in this process.  It's just a matter of "this is something different, we're calling it something else.:"

×
×
  • Create New...