• Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create an account.

Shel_B

BPA-free Cans

7 posts in this topic

So many people lobbied to get BPA out of cans that manufacturers are removing the chemical. Very nice ... but, have you asked yourself what BPA has been replaced with. In many instances it's BPS, which is in the same family as BPA. It's not very good stuff either ... but now our cans are free of that nasty BPA.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=bpa-replacement-also-alters-hormones

http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/manufacturers-replace-bpa-still-highly-toxic-bps

What are your feelings about this? Do you care about these chemicals being potentially dangerous? Or do you feel that these chemicals are safe to use, perhaps a loud few are blowing the issue out of proportion? Do you seek out safer packaging (whatever that may mean to you) or just reach for a favorite brand or what's on sale with little thought to the packaging? Do you trust certain brands to do the right thing, or are you skeptical of any claims that may be made?


 ... Shel

"... ya can't please everyone, so ya got to please yourself "

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think France is phasing it out completely but according to what I've read so far, which isn't that much, there isn't much evidence suggesting that the levels of BPA that we are exposed to are significant for effects on reproductive and endocrine systems to happen. Though the evidence does show that on animal tests higher levels do cause disorders in sexual dimorphic traits in the reproductive system and the brain. I think a lot of the bans and regulations are, to quote, purely "cosmetic"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Potential harm does not equal certain harm. When relying on animal testing studies, in general the animal is given an enormous amount of the substance to be tested, much much larger than a human would be able to consume in a lifetime, let alone in the condensed time frame used in the test. As of now, the FDA does not call Bisphenol A a toxin, but it does caution not to heat containers lined with BPA if one is worried about transfer.

This isn't a thing I worry about. At all.


Edited by annabelle (log)
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm kinda glad that the alarmist crowd is vigilant, because otherwise we might still be sealing tin cans with lead.

So I want to know.

But then, I want to decide for myself how much of a threat any of this stuff poses.

In general, our family doesn't eat "a lot" of much of anything, so rarely do we decide that we consume enough of any one product for it to be of any real danger to us.

In this case, sign me up with the "not at all" crowd.

3 people like this

I don't understand why rappers have to hunch over while they stomp around the stage hollering.  It hurts my back to watch them. On the other hand, I've been thinking that perhaps I should start a rap group here at the Old Folks' Home.  Most of us already walk like that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PanaCana and Jaymes, we tend to eat mainly freshly prepared foods, except pasta since I have to draw the line somewhere or never leave the kitchen.

I generally try to keep track of what may or may not be good or bad for us, but honestly, it's a crap shoot. Remember when eggs were going to kill us? Now it's wheat and GMOs or farmed fish. No! shellfish! No! Nitrates!

You get the picture.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Annabelle - I generally eat freshly-prepared foods (and I'm totally with you on pasta - I work in a bakery and then come home and live in my kitchen. If I made pasta too I'd never see the outside of the kitchen or get much sleep!)

And on the no-no list the only things are those that I or my family are actually allergic to. In any other respect, bring on the butter-drenched shellfish - I'm going to die anyhow, so I might as well enjoy myself while I'm here.

3 people like this

Elizabeth Campbell, baking 10,000 feet up at 1° South latitude.

My eG Food Blog (2011)My eG Foodblog (2012)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.