Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create a free account.
unfortunately, this issue is an obvious victim of "local" / "common" / "name"
bazillions of "same things" go by local usage names.
and "same things" is not identical to "same cut" - a definition of 'wide flat muscle cut' can pertain to a gazillion bits and pieces of an animal.
I've seen the same issue with "flat iron steak" - it was "recently invented" - uhmmm, the cow is not exactly "recent" . . .
and the variations offered on-line absolutely prove . . . . just not the same thing here . . .
unfortunately, this issue is an obvious victim of "local" / "common" / "name"
bazillions of "same things" go by local usage names.
and "same things" is not identical to "same cut" - a definition of 'wide flat muscle cut' can pertain to a gazillion bits and pieces of an animal.
I've seen the same issue with "flat iron steak" - it was "recently invented" - uhmmm, the cow is not exactly "recent" . . .
and the variations offer on-line absolutely prove . . . . just not the same thing here . . .
unfortunately, this issue is an obvious victim of "local" / "common" / "name"
bazillions of "same things" go by local usage names.
and "same things" is not identical to "same cut" - a definition of 'wide flat muscle cut' can pertain to a gazillion bits and pieces of a animal.
I've seen the same issue with "flat iron steak" - it was "recently invented" - uhmmm, the cow is not exactly "recent" . . .
and the variations offer on-line absolutely prove . . . . just not the same thing here . . .
