Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create a free account.

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 9/2/2021 at 12:36 PM, Kerry Beal said:

Even with bad temper - things molded up against a shiny surface are often quite shiny. You'll see swirlies on the inside but shine on the outside. How have you tempered that though?

Expand  

It was my first attempt at tabling -- guess it didn't go so well. I dumped most of the mixture on the slab, got the temp down to low 80s and heated it back up over water bath to low 90s. 

 

My guess is maybe I had too little chocolate in the bowl (about 500 grams in a 5 quart bowl) and the heating/cooling process was more volatile than ideal. Or maybe I just did it all wrong, idk. I'm going to go back to the seeding method for a bit :D

 

Also, is that fat bloom in your estimation? I also had a sneaking suspicion some leftover water on a spoon dropped in (picked it up out of the dish rack), but I didn't see it and the chocolate didn't seize, so maybe not.

Posted
  On 9/2/2021 at 1:22 PM, Kerry Beal said:

Poor temper is fat bloom basically - so yes. Those are likely form VI agglomerations.  

 

Tiny amounts of water will thicken the chocolate but it won't seize until you reach critical mass. 

Expand  

 

Now that you mention it, I did notice the chocolate had thickened up, but I assumed that was because I had kept it at working temp for about 3 hours. Would that have had something to do with it, or does the thickening not inhibit temper?

 

Also, I did not know type VI could give way to bloom, thought it was a stable crystal. 

×
×
  • Create New...