Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create a free account.

Recommended Posts

Posted

Interesting article/study. One issue that occurred to me is whether the three types of are being used for their optimal results, and whether some types of land are being converted, as mentioned in the avocado article you posted.

Imagine all the food you have eaten in your life and consider that you are simply some of that food, rearranged.  -Max Tegmark, physicist

 

Gene Weingarten, writing in the Washington Post about online news stories and the accompanying readers' comments: "I basically like 'comments,' though they can seem a little jarring: spit-flecked rants that are appended to a product that at least tries for a measure of objectivity and dignity. It's as though when you order a sirloin steak, it comes with a side of maggots."

 

When a clown moves into a palace, he does not become a king. The palace becomes a circus. -Elizabeth Bangs, writer

Posted

The study is horribly designed. It examines the environmental impact if the entire planet converted to a single diet which is not only unrealistic but also not useful to the average consumer. Of course if everyone switched to veganism, there would be a lot of scrubland that we couldn't use any more but we're far from that point.

 

Instead, the more useful measure is marginal impact and a switch to veganism would take productive grain growing land and switch it from animal feed to human feed and be extremely good for the environment. 

PS: I am a guy.

×
×
  • Create New...