Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create a free account.
I was just comparing nutritional values of different cocoa powders and then I started to think...how come the ghirardelli is so low on calories? I wish they would just do 100g for nutritional data, people don’t want an easy math???
Anyway, attaching a picture.
In my world 1g of fat=9 calories, 3g of carbs=12 and 1g of protein 4. For a total of 25 cal not 15. So 100g of product is 416 cal not 250.
It frustrates me so much. With smaller numbers also mistakes are more difficult to see.
I was just comparing nutritional values of different cocoa powders and then I started to think...how come the ghirardelli is so low on calories? I wish they would just do 100g for nutritional data, people don’t want an easy math???
Anyway, attaching a picture.
In my world 1g of fat=9 calories, 3g of carbs=12 and 1g of protein 4. For a total of 25 cal not 15. So 100g of product is 416 cal not 250.
It frustrated me so much. With smaller numbers also mistakes are more difficult to see.
I was just comparing nutritional values of different cocoa powders and it then I started to think...how come the ghirardelli is so low on calories. I wish they would just do 100g for nutritional data, people don’t want an easy math???
Anyway, attaching a picture.
In my world 1g of fat=9 calories, 3g of carbs=12 and 1g of protein 4. For a total of 25 cal not 15. So 100g of product is 416 cal not 250.
It frustrated me so much. With smaller numbers also mistakes are more difficult to see.
I was just comparing nutritional values of different cocoa and it then I started to think...how come the ghirardelli is so low on calories. I wish they would just do 100g for nutritional data, people don’t want an easy math???
Anyway, attaching a picture.
In my world 1g of fat=9 calories, 3g of carbs=12 and 1g of protein 4. For a total of 25 cal not 15. So 100g of product is 416 cal not 250.
It frustrated me so much. With smaller numbers also mistakes are more difficult to see.
