paulraphael

To my eyes, tarnish patina says "these are pans. They get used." Polished copper says "these are trophies."

I can see how the SVS would be convenient for someone willing to dedicate counter space to another appliance. At least as far as storage goes. It's going to be a lot harder than a cambro to fill and clean. I'm using the v1 Anova, which is very small. It fits on a low shelf right next to my 11x11 polycarbonate container. I use that container of the time. It stows with its lid, a piece of reflectix cut to fit, and an SVS rack (which fits perfectly with the anova). I've also got a 30qt cooler cut to fit the circulator. That gets used less often, so I store it away from the kitchen. One thing I like about this setup is that it would be trivially easy to pack it all and bring to someone else's house, or to an event space. It's a great portable solution.

Interesting: Microbial deterioration of vacuum-packaged chilled beef cuts and techniques for microbiota detection and characterization: a review "Clostridium and Enterobacteriaceae (5), can multiply in vacuum-packaged meat causing deterioration and pack distension at refrigeration temperatures. These microorganisms have been the subject of many studies. Species of Clostridium that are able to grow at refrigeration temperatures have been identified as causative agents of blowing vacuum packages. Recently, new genera, such as Enterobacteriaceae, have also been shown to cause the same problem" "The deterioration caused by psychrotrophic and psychrophilic Clostridium is associated with proteolysis, loss of texture, accumulation of liquid in packages and an unpleasant smell, mainly hydrogen sulfide gas (55). In anaerobic conditions, proteins are degraded into sulfur compounds, which have strong and disgusting odor. End products of non-protein nitrogen compounds generally include ammonia (34)." "The deterioration of vacuum-packaged meat caused by Enterobacteriaceae bacteria is often characterized by unpleasant odors and / or greening of the meat, instead of gas production (5). The proliferation of this bacterium in vacuumpacked meat is generally limited to products with a pH greater than 5.8 (28) and is more likely to occur with temperature abuses (5) above 6ºC (36). Enterobacteriaceae species that grow in vacuum-packed meat (Serratia liquefaciens, Hafnia spp) are able to grow at temperatures between 0 and 10ºC (43). At temperatures above 6ºC, Enterobacteriaceae decarboxylate amino acids, producing organic amines, which have putrid odors and tastes." "Vacuum packages for fresh meat increase the shelf life and thus improve the distribution efficiency and marketing of the product. Deterioration problems are minimized when the pH of the meat to be packaged is controlled and ideal storage temperatures are accurately maintained. Even at suitable refrigeration temperatures, however, meat may be subject to deterioration by microorganisms that are able to grow under these conditions in the absence of oxygen. Psychrotrophic and psychrophilic Clostridium species have been shown to cause blown pack type of deterioration; however, other species that produce CO2 such as Enterobacter, Serratia, Hafnia and Rahnella may also contribute. There has been little research on these organisms, especially those that cause the blown pack problem."

Edward, I was trying to say that the 7qt is close to the hobarts except that it has electronic speed control (rather than a multispeed gear box). And by close, I just mean that it has a big motor, good quality gears, and real bearings.

The issue is that the brisket was rolled before vacuum packing. If you want to do it this way, then dipping the bagged brisket in boiling water will still only heat the portions that are currently on the outside. I would just dispense with the vacuum packing. It's not necessary. Use a big ziplock or an oven bag, with a little liquid added (stock, etc.). Evacuate the air by immersing it. There's really no downside.

The 18-10 stainless used in laminated copper pans is not magnetic. I'd assume those pans are lined with tin. The only caveat is that I once saw an ad for copper pans lined with nickel.

How was the lilac ice cream? We're growing some lavender ... I may try something with it when it's ready.

Shalmanes's explanation makes more sense than the mold idea. It's an interesting point ... should be obvious, but I've never seen rolling meat mentioned specifically as something to avoid.

Since you said green-brown slime and dry aging, I'm wondering if it was actually some form of mold. There aren't any bacterial pathogens that reproduce at 56C, so I don't believe that bacteria would be the issue. Technically your meat should have been pasteurized within 6 hours of reaching 55C. But I never hear anyone talk about mold (or algae) when coming up with food pasteurization tables. Dry aging often encourages mold growth on the outside of the meat. It's cut away with the dessicated outer portions, but this isn't done under sterile conditions. The question is if there's any mold that grows in both the medium humidity and sub-4°C environment of dry aging, and the 100% humidity and 56C environment of your sous-vide bag. It's a new one to me. I don't believe you did anything that would raise a red flag, but many people choose to sear or blanch meat before any long, low-temp cook. I'd suggest doing this in the future. But it doesn't answer your question directly. I can just offer another guess as to what happened.

The new 7qt KA is probably the burliest mixer they've ever made. It has a motor and gear box design that's closer to the non-KA hobarts in many ways. It uses electronic speed control like the other KA mixers, but is otherwise a completely new design. People who had trouble with big batches of low-hydration doughs with the old KAs have an easy time with this one. I've had great luck with my refurbished pro-600 over the last 5 years. I use it for big batches of cookie dough, medium sized batches of bread and pizza dough (high-hydration ... nothing terribly difficult), ice cream churning and meat grinding. It's loud, and the guts are not especially high precision, but it's been completely reliable. I'd recommend the 7qt to anyone doing lots of stiff bread dough.

I'm guessing a 3/8" thick steel pan would be more efficient (in terms of energy cost and preheat time) unless you're planning to cook a lot of pizzas back to back.

I looked into doing this, thinking the modernist steel looked a bit pricey. All the quotes I found from metal fabricators were much more expensive. I looked into 1/4" steel and 1/4 to 3/8" aluminum. I didn't look into stainless due to its high price and relatively poor conductivity (although it would still do better than the stone I have now).

I think the most critical issue in roasting a chicken is getting the temperatures right on both the white and dark meat. It's hard ... the white meat cooks lower but is thinner and more directly exposed to the heat. Smart spit roasters back in the day would selectively bard the bird. They'd cover the torso with strips of fat for part of the cooking, but leave the legs exposed. Aside from cooking bird parts separately, this still works better than anything I've tried. Instead of fat you can just use foil. I haven't found improvements with chickens from long cooking, so I roast hot. YMMV. At any rate, I cover the breasts with a doubled layer of foil for the first part of the cooking, and then uncover. It browns quickly. My ideal would be to get the breasts to 60°C and the thighs to 63°C. I have yet to achieve this on a perfectly browned bird, but I come pretty close. Usually after rising the meat is a few degrees higher than this in places. Not ideal, but still a lot juicier than I've had from other whole-bird techniques.

Ok, I dug a little deeper. This study finds that calpains and cathespins break down proteins into smaller peptides. This increases tenderness and "mildness" but does not increase the beefy flavors we associate with aging. However, these new peptides are then broken down into smaller free amino acids by amino peptidases, in particular ones categorized as C, H, and P. These free amino acids are the flavor bombs. Another study finds alanyl and arginyl aminopeptidases (RAP) to be important flavor compound creators in dry-cured meats. I don't know if these enzymes are relevant or not to dry aging (or sous-vide "warm aging"). This study on dry cured ham (abstract only) found a correlation between bitterness and cathespin levels (bitterness also correlated with a lot of other factors). Lower bitterness levels correlated with higher amino peptidase levels. This study (based in part on Baldwin's work) sites a food science book that found prolonged cooking at 49°C to improve tenderness significantly, but that it introduces "somewhat undesirable flavors." This would be consistent with the study above. By 55°C, many of the enzymes are inactive, but collagenase keeps doing its thing. Here's what I've found, mostly by attempting to interpret biology papers that were tackling entirely unrelated questions (translation: don't trust this). Aminopeptidases C, H, and P C: maximum 40°C? H: maximum 60-70°C? P: maximum 80°C? alanyl and arginyl aminopeptidases (RAP) stable up to 45°C? most active -1°C to 19°C? Thoughts so far: -prolonged "warm aging" at 40°C may be a better bet than 50°C, because of the off-flavors reported by a few sources, and because it's in the range where more of the aminopeptides are active. Is there a biologist in the house who can comment?

Has anyone experimented much with this? I'm curious about the effect on flavors. I've been trying to research effects of enzymatic activity on dry aging flavor and have found surprisingly little ... most of the literature is about texture. One source I found suggests that enzyme activity at 60°C can actually encourage off-flavors in beef. But I don't know anything about the circumstances or methodology of the study.

The book doesn't mention anything about times in the 40-50C range. Any guidelines? Are any of the enzymes active in this range responsible for aged meat flavors?

I have some of the chicago metalic sheet pans (aluminized steel), some heavy plain aluminum ones (Lincoln and others), and some lighter ones from the restaurant store (myster brands). They are very slightly different from each other in practice. The lightweight generic ones feel flmsiest and are more likely to warp, but cook the same as the heavy aluminum pans. The chicago pans are slightly less conductive than the aluminum pans, which means that all else being equal, they'll brown things on the bottom just a bit less. The difference is small, and whether it's a plus or a minus depends entirely on what you're doing. 90% of the time I use them all completely interchangeably. Which is why I'm hesitant to spend much on sheet pans. If I had to pick just one, it would be the Lincoln Wearevers. I forget the gauge, but it's the heaviest I've seen. You can definitely find them at online restaurant stores. The 1/4 sheet size is one of my favorite inventions. I have a few; they haven't gone in the oven, but are great for prep, chilling things in the fridge or freezer, etc..

The first things that come to mind are a chili, or Indian dishes based on lentils or chickpeas. A chana masala would be cheap, vegetarian, easy to make in giant pots, and packed with flavor. Bulk dessert is a bit of a challenge. Maybe a giant cobbler?

Ha. I didn't realize it could be set that low.

My starting point with herbal flavors is 7g herbs /L. I use leaves and stems, if the stems are flavorful. I assume with lilacs you'd use petals? Coarsely cut, and infuse first into the milk + trimoline. This helps disolve the syrup, and aromatic oils are more soluble in a sugar syrup than in plain water or a fatty emulsion.

It's clear that a lot of us love our heavy coppy copper pans ... there's no arguing with that. The question I'm considering is if I'd recommend them to someone who'd tohave to buy them new. And I can only think of a couple of circumstances where I would. This is because the benefits are not going to make a major, quantifiable difference, and the costs are huge. I'd recommend them to someone with money to burn who just loves them for whatever reason. Or to someone serious about saucemaking. For this I'd recommend a single slope-sided or curve-sided saucepan, 1.5 to 2 liters. For just about everyone else, I'd suggest good cookware that costs half as much and that will do induction. Use the savings for an immersion circulator or two, a pressure cooker, and other things that will actually give new powers in the kitchen.

This would be a welcome feature for a firmware update for version 1. They'd just need to set it so the circulator starts when you turn the unit on.

My first round of experiments with water and boxed stock were promising. Starting with stock enriched with 2% gelatin, I got a good, creamy texture with 0.2% lambda carrageenen (TIC gums Ticacell 750) and 0.1% xanthan gum (Bob's Red Mill from supermarket). These are cold-soluble with a stick blender, and have good clarity and excellent flavor release. And they're heat stable. The xanthan gives a bit of that jiggly cling. I may try dropping it down to 0.07%, but will have to try in a real jus / coulis first. For last-minute sauce thickening, I tried whisking in a 1.5 : 1 mix of arrowroot and lambda carrageenan. In the past I've used 5 :1 arrowroot and xanthan. The carrageenan gives a slightly nicer texture, but is harder to get into solution without lumps It's synergistic with starches, so you can use less starch. The downside is there's less starch to keep the gum from clumping. The upside is better flavor release. For the first time ever I sampled pure water thickened with these colloids. While I wasn't tempted to go back for seconds, I was pleased that there were no bad flavors, and barely any detectable flavor at all.

I've done that! works great for a couple of plates but not burly enough if you have more than a few guests. Once when I had a convection/toaster oven with a defective thermostat, I hung onto it after the replacement showed up, just so I could use it as a plate warmer at a big dinner. It's all it was good for it.

David, can you tell us what ratios and times/temps you were using?