Jump to content

culinary bear

participating member
  • Posts

    857
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by culinary bear

  1. The enzyme has a lot of really interesting potentials. to give increased water retention, and to give creaminess and high-fat mouthfeel to low fat products.

    glad he 'discovered' it... :rolleyes:

    I'm wondering about the mechanical differences in action between polyphosphates and TGA regarding water retention...

  2. Bloody hell, seven new posts in the time it takes me to reply? I must be getting slow in my old age.

    Paula, where have you been all my (culinary) life? I do feel unfit to bask in your glowing culinary radiance. :)

  3. I have a jar of duck foie gras in the fridge also covered in fat, do you think the same holds true? I'd like to have some on new years eve but I know we won't eat it all! will I be able to just take what I need and cover the rest and use it within a few weeks?

    Also I'm making the cassoulet too and just confit'ed my duck legs. Les Halles called for cooking them at 375F for 1 hour. This is much different. What are your thoughts on that?

    In an ideal world, yes, you should be able to recover and use it within a short period of time. Just keep an eye out for discolouration, off-smells, the usual signs of spoilage.

    I like Tony Bourdain. Really, I do. I plan to buy the man prodigious amounts of Manchester bitter if he comes over to the city again. I have never heard of a recipe for confiting duck at such a high temperature for so short a time, which perhaps says more about me than that recipe. My gut instinct is that you wouldn't get tenderness cooking it at that temp for that time, but I may be wrong.

  4. Okay, is that an offshoot of the familytree of control I was talking about? How in the name of Aunt Hattie can one be allergic to water? Allergic to 70% of your bodyweight? OK, and believe me when I understand about contraindications with meds totally screwing up your bodys, but if your needs are that dire, and you're eating at that fine an establishment, should you not call ahead of time and give the chef a chance in Hell of accomodating? Or am I just too old for my Jimmy Chu's?

    In the heat of service, a lot of chefs will tell you to piss off if you bombard them with arcane requests... Phone ahead either on the day, or glory of glories, the day before and explain your wants, and just about every chef I know worth their salt will do their utmost to give you something compatible, and special.

  5. Having said that, I think some flexibility is in order. Some customers' choices are made due to allergy or disease (i.e., compromised immune system), and to endeavor to accommodate such customers can be an act of compassion.

    That raises an interesting point, and one I see an awful lot of :

    "Chef, the customer on table X is allergic to :"

    egg

    dairy products (but not butter)

    margarine

    water (!)

    gluten

    garlic, onions, tomatoes

    all vegetables

    blood

    Now, I'm a biochemist by original training; I know people can be allergic to all sorts of things, but I suspect a lot of people are jumping on the 'allergy bandwagon' in order to lend weight to personal whims.

  6. This has kind of grown from a comment I made, and the responses to it, in the Festivus thread.

    You know the scenario, regardless of which side of the divide you normally see it from. A customer wants his wild salmon or his venison fillet cooked well-done, or complains that the seared foie gras isn't cooked in the middle.

    Marco Pierre White famously charged a customer 30 pounds for the bowl of chips they'd been cheeky enough to ask for in his michelin 3-star restaurant.

    At what point are chefs justified in drawing the line? Should customers always get what they want, on the basis that they're the ones paying for it? Should chefs have the opportunity to say that they're not prepared to serve tomato ketchup with their foie gras, or to cook that pigeon breast well-done?

    I'd appreciate your views, from all sides of this.

  7. Add 5 more for me.  Yay Christmas!

    My records say 242, but that doesn't include some I have in storage in the parental vaults. Put me down for that many for the moment. :rolleyes:

    I'm only 29 - the 242 represents about five years of casual acquisition and about 2 of the serious variety. Bugger, I'm going to need a big house to retire in. Sod the wallpaper, I'll just have bookshelves!

  8. The obvious requirement is a high level of confidence in the ability of your lid to stay on the container. The pickle jar is tried and trusted; I wouldn't like to mop up a few quarts of warm duck fat from the carpet. :)

  9. I was wondering what a turducken was; thought it sounded German!

    Hugh Fearnly-Whittingstall made a 10-bird roast on TV the other day, and if I remember rightly, the birds were the following :

    turkey

    goose

    duck

    pheasant

    chicken

    guinea fowl

    pigeon

    partidge

    woodcock

    budgerigar

    okay, I'm lying about the budgie but I forgot what the 10th one was.

  10. C'mon, you know that the waiter didn't mean that the chef discovered an enzyme, give us a break!!!

    I disagree - the phrase "the chef has discovered an enzyme" is pretty plain and clear.

    Not trying to stir the pot of Sh... here, but you know, you guys can't take this too seriously!!  Granted, it sounds like something that could have been said or delivered better, but give the poor waiter a break, he wasn't trying to steal the Nobel Prize for science or anything!!  I wish people would have more fun w/ food and not take it so seriously, it makes them uptight!!

    hee hee... I have great fun with food; I always find it ironic that my mum told me not to play with my food as a kid, and now I do it for a living! I know what you mean though.

    I know what waiting staff are like, and I know they're primed to use the phrases that they do; in all seriousness (and fun) I do find it hard to accept that the motive behind that particular phrase was to do anything other than try and convince the customer of the chef's ability rather than to educate them about the food; that's something I think is fundamentally wrong.

    BTW, if it were El Bulli and the waiter had said the same thing about the Chef discovering something, would anyone here question wheter or not he had actually discovered it?  Would you be busting his balls too?  :shock:

    good point, well-presented... :smile: Yes though, I probably would! If you never ask any questions, you don't learn much. Hence eGullet.

  11. it is actually an enzyme

    but more interesting is how eager all the respondents are to label it as something they already know how to use.

    It would be difficult if not impossible to create the precise texture and taste with egg whites, agar or alginate/calcium chloride solution.

    Either way, hats off to Chef Wylie Dufresne for a novel application of industrial food science in gastronomy.

    Enzyme (n) - Any of numerous proteins or conjugated proteins produced by living organisms and functioning as specialized catalysts for biochemical reactions.

    source : dictionary.com

    In the original post, it was described how the waiter :

    announced the dish as follows: "The chef has discovered an enzyme that binds protein to protein".

    No, he did not 'discover an enzyme'; he may have found a novel application for an existing enzyme (and if that's the case he's to be applauded) but it is falsehood and plagiarism to take credit for the work of another, and this is what in effect what it taking place if the waiter is maintaining, with these words, that Mr Dufresne has discovered the enzyme for himself.

    You may think I'm splitting hairs, but in the scientific community such apparently semantic distinctions are real, significant, and established.

    but more interesting is how eager all the respondents are to label it as something they already know how to use.

    you'll notice I did no such thing... :smile: rather, I took pains to point out that egg white and agar-agar, as people were theorising were the active agents in the 'pasta', were not enzymes at all.

    Hats off for the progress of new scientific approaches to cooking and those who practise it. Boo-hiss to all those who use science as a tool to mystify rather than to explain.

    Allan Brown

    Bachelor of Science (Biochemistry, Edinburgh University)

    Fellow of the Royal Medical Society

    Fair-to-middling bridge player :smile:

    Merry Christmas, everyone!

  12. absolutely... they have a taste which combines the bitterness of rocket and the pepperiness of red mustard leaf.

    a fairly sharp vinaigrette, well-seasoned, would be a good partner.

  13. Is anyone else absolutely horrified at the thought of 'lobster cassoulet'? I'm almost at the stage of not eating in places that have it on the menu.

    My tuppence worth : lamb, confit duck, couennes, sausage, belly pork. Bear is a crumb advocate.

    And if you can't use your breath to defrost your car door lock the next morning, there wasn't enough garlic in it.

  14. I like the exchanges this thread has prompted. :)

    For the record, my duck legs were coming in about 300g each (that's about 11oz for all you luddites). :smile:

    I have in the past used Reg Johnson's Goosnargh duck legs with fantastic results, but you'll never manage to get hold of them outside the UK.

    I usually store the legs whole; this is what I'm doing with the second batch of ten legs. The first batch I potted as the picked meat because they're going to be given as presents and some friends have an aversion to food that looks like a Damien Hirst installation... :rolleyes:

    A tip I forgot to mention, by the way : when you've lifted the legs out of the pan of fat, you'll notice there's liquid at the bottom of the pan underneath the fat layer. This is a fantastically flavoursome gelatinous stock and shouldn't be wasted. It's easy to separate if you pour the whole lot into a TIGHTLY lidded jar (I use a 4 litre / 1 U.S. gallon pickle jar), put the lid on, and then store this upside down in the fridge until set. When set, turn the right way up, and your jellied stock is sitting obediently on top of the solid fat.

    I must admit to spreading this jelly on hot toast as a snack.

    Oh, okay, then. With a little of the fat too. :smile:

×
×
  • Create New...