Jump to content

culinary bear

participating member
  • Content Count

    857
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by culinary bear

  1. The FT deal, like the Times deal of a few years ago, gets people into your dining room. No, you won't make as much profit as with a normal TDH or carte table but the trade-off is that you get new blood in through the door as well as both existing customers and the "never to return" brigade. In the case of existing customers, treat it as a reward for loyalty. As for the "never to return" brigade, you never know who they'll talk to and they may have friends who do eat out more regularly. It's just another form of advertising, but a well-targeted one, and your establishment appearing in the FT
  2. Available in a limited relase of zero, to avoid offending the human community. I do think it's going to backfire on vivat bacchus; as has been pointed out, the dining types it's aimed at probably won't be sucked in, and the publicity will come with a spoiling dose of derision. If it had come from Gagnaire, maybe, just maybe... but not a place headed by a chef with no marketable reputation.
  3. Truly shocking photography; I've seen better on the menu outside chip shacks in Amsterdam, the ones trying to shepherd tourits with the munchies thriough their doors. This sort of thing is no different to a pub up here that decided to create the world's most expensive pie. "Stan? Oi, Stan. What's that fookin' jap beef they keep bangin on about? Wag-what? Wagyu? Yeah, how much is a pound? Fookin' brilliant, I'll have a pound of that... and ring up that nob'ead from the wine company and ask what his priciest bottle is. We'll use some o'them really poncey mushroom thigies wot get dug up
  4. Not even that, but no longer a rising star rating. I feel sorry for Marc, he's worked hard.
  5. Brilliant! Well done to the two I know, Stephen Harris at the Sportsman and Matt Tomkinson at The Goose...
  6. Extremely... and although I know that Jay wouldn't be posting unless he knew the score, you still always want to wait until you see it in Michelin-approved black and white. Still, I'm ecstatic And for Stephen and Emma at the Sportsman too...
  7. http://www.michelin.co.uk/uk/front/affich....codeRubrique=43
  8. Yeah, he only takes lunch at newly be-starred establishments... Gary, you starf**ker.
  9. How soon after the official announcement does the .pdf go up on the website?
  10. Your point's valid - Edinburgh's just the exception to prove the rule. When you consider the number of high-end "failures" in city centre locations - and I include in here some very aspirational restaurants that took one shocked look at their P&L figures for the early openings, promptly passed a brick and tamed down the food to be more marketable - then it is, as you say, horribly difficult to run a starred restaurant in a city centre. In the case of No.1 Princes Street, it helps greatly that it's part of the Balmoral Hotel. Indeed, I woud suggest it's only because of this that it's a fi
  11. Yes, that's right! Mind you, I'm talking around the turn of the century here.
  12. You're right (and v. sad that Plaisir is now defunct) - there seems to be some sort of invisible barrier once you get to the World's End, and nothing much below that flourishes. Didn't Off the Wall once have a place near Old College up the road opposite James Thin?
  13. Edinburgh has a michelin star at No.1 Princes Street, Thom. I'm not sure how much more city centre you want
  14. Good luck everyone; I hope you all get the results you deserve.
  15. A member's first post is a glowing review of a new restaurant? *strokes chin in cynical manner* Definitely sounds like a plant, though I'd love to be proved wrong. Good luck with the location, because if they don't click with the Scottish Parliament brigade they're not going to survive; that area's been a graveyard for years.
  16. See, I know this is going to sound like my dissing my former workplace... but that's the sort of thing Le Mont should have done in the first place. It failed for the same reasons as Establishment : 1) Food not geared to the market - classical french for Le Mont, and "too-clever-for-manchester-at-the-time" cooking for Establishment. 2) A need to sit every service pretty near capacity to bring a good return. 3) Lack of awareness in the dining public about their existence. Reading Modern's menu, I don't get that impression from either the content or the pricing. if 3) can be adequately address
  17. no, not sarky at all... I heard from the ex-head chef of the downstairs bit, Tony Holland-Bennett, that an urbis takeover was being discussed but didn't know whether it had come to fruition. Bertie - really? Good to hear. I used to work upstairs and would be very interested in seeing the difference. I always got the impression that Le Mont was run mostly as a vanity operation - i.e. the head chef (I'm sure you know the one) knew fuck all about what GP he was running, stocktakes were non-existant, etc etc. Never the sign of a restaurant run to make a serious profit.
  18. The site deserves to do well - when it was Le Mont they didn't advertise at all well and having a tiny and subdued street-level entrance really didn't help at all. If they get that fixed then they may start attracting not just passing trade but might actually make people aware of the existence of the place. I'd be very interested to find out who's running the place now. p.s. Good review, Thom... ever thought about getting into PR/Media?
  19. I wholeheartedly agree.. Why complain about poverty and not being able to afford a £5-7 bird while smoking ten fags on your way to the supermarket? It's all about choise, and while we have more choice nowadays than ever before, we shouldn't be surprised that people do choose the cheapest possible option. Some of them genuinely have more important things to spend their money on, but in the vast majority of cases it's down to a combination of inertia, lack of education about choices, and generally not giving two shits about eatnig cheap chicken that tastes like penguin.
  20. The sportsman really does deseve a star. Honest and forthright cooking of a sort I've not encountered in a long time. Fraiche for 1* please. LCS - I've only been once, and I was impressed, but not to a 3* standard.
  21. I doubt that the list actually reflects the world's top fifty. The world's best connected fifty perhaps, the most media-friendly fifty, or fashionable fifty. Having said that, I doubt a 'rating' system like this can actually be any more objective, short of hiring a knowledgable and independent staff with no set agenda, who would visit restaurants, perhaps unannounced, and rate them objectively based on their food and surroundings. Nah, that would never work. I mean, what would the world be like without PR? (drifts off into a vision of paradise) Restaurant Magazine shouldn't be blamed for com
  22. It's technically Whalley Range... but only just. Chorlton itself begins when you come over the bridge crossing the railway line and start to see the hippies.
  23. That's a well-deserved good review, Gary... Well done!
  24. As Heathcote is planning three or four openings of his 'Olive Press' concept (a down-market chain Italian) in the next six months, I doubt a) he cares and b) he's even noticed. I disagree. That might be the case for a lot of the upper management in the Heathcotes organisation, but I know that both PH and Max Gnoyke (MD of the company and former head chef at Gavroche) will both be upset. I saw first-hand how happy PH was to have retained his star last year, and I can assure you he'll be hurting. It's often said that Longridge is run as a vanity operation, but it's not. GP is very tightly co
×
×
  • Create New...