Mjx

If you want them super-gross and mushy, yeh, into a plastic bag with an apple and seal, but seriously, Shel, they're bananas, not bricks, you can mash them up even if they're green, and they still taste of banana.

The suddenness and his age make this pretty shocking. I spoke with him only briefly, when I first joined eGullet, and he was very kind and welcoming, and I wish I'd had the opportunity to meet him. My thoughts are with his wife and son, and all those who were close to him.

The fruit would probably disintegrate to apple sauce during the prolonged cooking, which might actually work, but may not be what you want. If you search for pork + confit + [specific] fruit (rather than, say, fruit + confit), you should find a fair number of discussions that address what you're doing.

Discussion of using a wine cooler for chocolate storage, here: http://forums.egullet.org/topic/102510-summer-chocolate-storage-solutions/?p=1407947

Well, not baked, but how about fudge, or some other candy? The not-too-crumbly thing, combined with the other requirements may make finding suitable baked options a bit tricky.

The lobster rebellion '. . . .I believe that Mother Nature gave us eyes because she did not want us to eat this type of food. Mother Nature clearly intended for us to get our food from the "patty" group, which includes hamburgers, fish sticks and McNuggets -- foods that have had all of their organs safely removed in someplace far away such as Nebraska. . . .' (Dave Barry, Miami Herald, 28 January 1996 and 31 March 2014)

Some suggestions, here: http://forums.egullet.org/topic/143300-almond-meal-in-cakes-and-baking/

Virtually all. Seriously: It's not as though I have the most phenomenal guns–and, thanks to aikido and skating accidents, I have an arthritic wrist and an arthritic elbow–but I do everything with a handheld mixer, or some sort of unmechanized tool, and never encountered a problem. If I had a stand mixer, I don't know what I'd use it for, and getting one only because some recipes mention one seems an insane waste of cash and counterspace. My boyfriend's mother adores her stand mixer, because she can just wander away while the mixer kneads bread, and I know several people who find holding a mixer or hand stirring/whipping/kneading exhausting/painful (and someday, I may find it so myself), but I cannot think of a single recipe for which a stand mixer is a sine qua non (including recipes that specify them). If you need a third hand (e.g. some candy making), another person can usually be pressed into service for the few minutes that takes. And this does seem to concern you a bit; this is at least the second topic you've started, asking about making do without a stand mixer

Seems like the manufacturer is the one to ask about the possibility of any problems related to your question; all we can do is toss out our best hypotheses, which may be way off base, depending on the specific characteristics of the stainless steel of your cookware.

http://forums.egullet.org/topic/141919-sealing-liquids-in-chamber-vacuum-sealer/ Also, forums.egullet.org/topic/147165-chamber-vacuum-sealers-2014–/

Chocolate is fine in the refrigerator, although I can't think of any good reason to store it there, unless it is really hot in every corner of your home. Like almost everything else refrigerated, it'll develop surface condensation when you remove it, so you'll want to wipe it down.

As has been noted by many, and on many occasions, most of the recipes you're going to come across in standard cookbooks were developed before most people had stand mixers, or are based on such recipes. Stand mixers have some advantages in terms of attachments, such as sausage stuffers, and are a boon for the frail, but otherwise, carry on with your hand-held mixer/unmechanized mixing thingies/your own fair hands, and stop worrying about it.

What sort of pâté are you talking about?

Yes. Unless you're drinking a pondful of the stuff, the number of calories from the residual fat should be relatively insignificant.

How do you form the logs, starting with the portioning? I pull off a compact clump, press it into a ball, then lengthen it into a log by gently rolling it; I haven't run into the problem you describe, which may be caused by folding the dough on itself (which I don't do).

If a vacuum pump is used to remove most of the air from the bag, 'vacuum' has a good deal to to with 'sous vide', and is, in fact the reason it's called 'cooking/preparing food sous vide' (and the reason 'SVing' is meaningless). Vacuum pumps don't come particularly cheap, so if you're interested in vacuum sealing your food prior to cooking, the answer to the OP is 'no'. That doesn't mean you can't use the technique of cooking bagged food in a water bath at a low temperature over a long period of time, but regardless of whether or not 'sous vide' is often used to describe that (i.e. no vacuum pump involved), it's inaccurate and silly to use the term to describe this. 'It's quibbling with semantics.' Perhaps. But if someone is going to use techniques that demand precision on several fronts, it also helps to use terms that clearly, accurately, and unambigously describe what is actually being done. Saying that this doesn't matter is just lazy (I have both the MC works, and have a lot of respect for Myhrvold, I just don't agree with every single thing he says).

Clarify what you mean by 'approximating sous vide'. 'Sous vide' means under vacuum; how are you planning on sealing this stuff? Are you just talking about extended, low-temp cooking of bagged food in a water bath?

Cook's Illustrated spoke highly of the OXO 10".

It's Rigoni di Asiago's Nocciolata (visible all the way in the upper right of the image upthread).

There are lots of options for flavouring caramels, and lots of discussions of this in the forums, including Variations on Caramel, Caramels with habanero, Creating Ginger Caramels, to name a just a few. There's some discussion of doubling recipes in the Caramel Troubleshooting discussion. I've doubled a caramel recipe only once, and the only difference I noticed was that it took a lot longer to get the sugar to temperature; the results were the same (I could swear I've read that the amount of liquid used should be somewhat reduced, but I cannot remeber where, and didn't do this).

This is the selection at the supermarket nearby (better stocked places have really impressive selctions of chocolate-nut spreads, with various sorts of nuts): At one point or another, I've tried them all. The organic, Italian one is a bit lest sweet, and has distinct hazelnut flavour, the 'Princip' brand one has tiny particles that suggest that they considered doing a chunky version, but chickened out, and the rest are the usual super-sweet, somewhat gluey, faintly nut-flavoured preparations we all know.

This is the selection at the supermarket nearby (better stocked places have really impressive selctions of chocolate-nut spreads, with various sorts of nuts): At one point or another, I've tried them all. The organic, Italian one is a bit less sweet, and has distinct hazelnut flavour (I recommend it), the 'Princip' one has tiny particles that suggest that they considered doing a chunky version, but lost their nerve, and the rest are the usual super-sweet, somewhat gluey, faintly nut-flavoured preparations we all know.

Generally, just go one for one. Also, there's this: http://forums.egullet.org/topic/100238-everything-you-wanted-to-know-about-brown-sugar/?p=663058

Arrowroot is pretty gloopy and starchy; konnyaku (aka konjak, konjaku) will probably give you results closest to those you'd get with gelatin. It's also easily found, reasonably priced, and vegan.

It would be great over risotto or gnocchi (pumpkin gnocchi, in particular).