Another look

[Florida Jim]

Its the third day after I opened the 2001 Protocolo (rouge)

and I am beginning to wonder about perhaps buying more (it was

recorked and allowed to sit out on the counter). It cost less than

$7, a very attractive price, but on the first day I'd have sworn

it was zinfandel from California. Now, it is more in line with

its 100% Tempranillo content; more rustic (as opposed to polished),

more distinctly tannic (which is what I think of when I think

of Tempranillo) but still strongly flavored and quite dry

(but not astringent) on the finish. I am thinking that

cellaring a few of these might be an interesting (and

inexpensive) experiment.

Comes a first dinner with folks from an internet wine board;

I know they like big, powerful, California style wines but,

to be honest, I don't. What to take?

I decide upon an old friend; the 1993 Vincent Arroyo,

Cabernet Sauvignon and it is a resounding hit. They like

it for its strong flavors and power in the mouth; I for its

complex notes of fruit and mint (which seems to morph into

light herb) and its length, which is truly exceptional. It

has taken all of 11 years to get this good; its initial years

were very tannic and made me question whether it would ever

come to this. But here it is; of its place, of its style

and, "surprise, surprise," delicious. It puts me in mind of

the two domestic 1991's I favor, the "Montys" (-lena and

-bello) and I like it slightly more than good bottles of the

1992 Groth, Reserve, which has always held a special place

in my heart.

The release price was $25, which included shipping,

delivered to my door. Were that there were more domestic

cabs. that could answer that call.

Best, Jim