Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create a free account.

Edit History

liuzhou

liuzhou

19 minutes ago, AlaMoi said:

 

from the article:

" The report warns that unchecked Chinese meat consumption will also degrade its arable land and worsen the country’s problems with obesity and diabetes. "

 

er, yes. But that doesn't answer the question at all. Where does it say

 

Quote

reducing people's meat consumption by 50% will fix obesity and diabetes or rid the world of pollution

 

?

 

Too many straw man arguments around here. So much more useful if you argue with what the article actually says rather than arguments you raise just to denounce them, but which were never in the article in the first place. Old trick.

liuzhou

liuzhou

17 minutes ago, AlaMoi said:

 

from the article:

" The report warns that unchecked Chinese meat consumption will also degrade its arable land and worsen the country’s problems with obesity and diabetes. "

 

er, yes. But where does it say

 

Quote

reducing people's meat consumption by 50% will fix obesity and diabetes or rid the world of pollution

 

?

 

Too many straw man arguments around here. So much more useful if you argue with what the article actually says rather than arguments you raise just to denounce them, but which were never in the article in the first place. Old trick.

liuzhou

liuzhou

10 minutes ago, AlaMoi said:

 

from the article:

" The report warns that unchecked Chinese meat consumption will also degrade its arable land and worsen the country’s problems with obesity and diabetes. "

 

er, yes. But where does it say

 

Quote

reducing people's meat consumption by 50% will fix obesity and diabetes or rid the world of pollution

 

?

 

Too many straw man arguments around here. So much more useful if you argue with what the article actually says rather than arguments you raise just to denounce, but which were never in the article in the first place. Old trick.

×
×
  • Create New...