Jump to content

IndyRob

participating member
  • Posts

    1,369
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by IndyRob

  1. Non-Newtonian fluids are cool. I am sure you have played with cornstarch and water. It behaves oppositely from ketchup: the more stress you put on it the more viscous it becomes.

    A demonstration.

    An old co-worker who used to be a waiter showed us a ketchup trick at lunch one day when it became needed. If you're having problems getting ketchup out of the bottle, hold your left hand as though you're about to karate chop the table. Then rap the neck of the bottle on your index finger right at the top level of the ketchup. I imagine this is an example of them shear thingies at work.

  2. Blether is correct. Osmosis is NOT the primary mechanism http://tinyurl.com/2vomcwl

    I was just passing on what Alton said in his book. I'm not qualified to argue the point, but I will post this link where the same debates have been had about the accuracy of Wikipedia's Brining article. Interestingly, the same Cook's Illustrated experiment referenced by the AmazingRibs link is used as both a refutation and confirmation of the omosis effects. The last post is interesting as it seems to be someone with some relevant experience thinking through both sides.

    But by a stroke of circular kismet, on the AmazingRibs page, if you click through the sidebar to get to 'Blonder's article', he does an interesting experiment which speaks to the original topic (how fast and far does the salt penetrate).

  3. Alton Brown is pretty adamant about how brines can bring other (water soluble) flavors into the meat and anecdotally I know this to be true for thinner cuts (an experimental brining of a piece of beef with a lot of coriander produced a vaguely pastrami-ish result).

    My big question with larger cuts is how much time is needed for the osmosis to reach the center - and whether some of the flavorings might be left behind at some point on the brine's journey towards the center. The salt level should eventually reach an equilibrium, but is there a reason for other flavors to make the whole trip?

    From looking at Alton's book, it appears that it will happen, but my gut feeling is that it isn't so simple.

    This almost begs an experiment where we put too much of an agressive flavor into a brine and then judge various parts of the resulting meat.

  4. You might think about less than free, but a good deal for a good reason. Currently, I'm working in an office that is flyer friendly. Stacks of flyers often appear in the break rooms. Some have gotten my attention. We've also had a couple of food trucks show up. Again, their presence was announced over the company e-mail. I think that companies (especially HR folks) view these types of things as contributing to the overall quality of life for their employees.

    You might try to learn about the companies based around you and offer specials catered to them. (e.g. Acme Sprocket Tuesday). Again, the HR folks will be keen to 'improve the quality of work life' if they just have to send out an e-mail. And if that's a success, see if you can cater their charity golf outing.

  5. Aargh! I wish this post had been up on Friday. I bought some welding gloves at Menard's Friday afternoon and was disappointed in them when I tried them out yesterday. I had to use a pot holder with them when I moved my roaster out of a 350 degree oven. I would have been fine with just the pot holders. I'll look out for heavy duty insulated ones next time. Any idea where I can find the good stuff?

    You might be able to preserve your investment with the purchase of a couple of 'Ove' Gloves. Long ago I used welding gloves for their intended purpose and they're about keeping external, airborne slag from hitting your skin. Not for holding hot things. The Nomex Ove' Gloves are no good at protecting against hot liquids, but are good with dry ambient heat. Together, they could be a good pairing.

  6. A super-slippery material that causes water, oil and even jam to slide off without leaving any residue could mean an end to fighting to get sauce out of ketchup bottles.

    The article talks about the age old (okay, decades old) problem of getting ketchup out of a bottle. This material would allow to glide out of the bottle - perhaps too well....

    But my mind went to the implications on dish washing. Could I turn a plate vertically over a trash can and immediately have a clean plate? Would servers have to develop new skills to prevent a chef's meticulous presentation from meeting an ignomious end?

    But if this pans out, and is proven safe, I wonder what sort of novel applications it might find.

  7. The riblets (or sometimes labeled 'rib tips') I've been buying are pork and quite cheap. I've been buying these at my local grocery for around $1 to $1.50/lb. A package will usually contain a considerable variety of cuts. Some (the good ones) will have a thick layer of fat on one end and will taper off towards the other end. Other pieces will be more like strips of randomly selected pork meat (sometimes even without the bone-lets).

    I don't think they're proper pieces of rib since they don't resemble anything I've seen when breaking down a whole sparerib. So Paul is probably correct in that it's probably some nearby trimming. By the looks of the end of the bones, it looks like a bandsaw is involved. Also, there are the occasional bone fragments, so watch out for those if you're shredding.

    Interestingly, a WalMart about a mile away sells riblets that are similar in nature, but immaculately chosen for consistancy and fastidiously arranged in their packaging - but for a price that rivals that of the best pork cuts.

  8. Not true -- the brine can have a little less salt than the amount in solution in the bird, and be both effective and actually decrease the salt content a little. Osmosis is a beautiful thing. The bird and the brine will try to reach equilibrium. With that salt transfer, some of the added brine flavorings transfer as well. It's not like a turkey is some kind of salt sponge.

    I think you're right on the equilibrium, but you'd get involved in a guessing game concerning the amount of salt that's already in the bird. A pre-brined bird is likely the result of a decent amount of thought and testing. A weak brine could pull flavors out of the bird. A stronger brine risks an equilibrium point that is too salty. In theory, you are correct, but in practice I'd start with a known quantity (an unbrined bird). Or just trust the corporate briners.

    If I had Activa, I'd be sorely tempted to remove the skin whole, break down the turkey and debone it, then then try to artfully put it back together to get a boneless whole turkey. Ideally, it would look traditional when brought to the table, but then you could slice it in half right through the backbone area revealing a stuffing.

    But a similar idea that I've actually done, is to remove all the meat and cut it into strips. Brine these and then lay them out on plastic wrap so you end up with a 'sheet' of turkey. Then apply some stuffing and roll it up.

    It didn't require Activa, but Activa could only give you a bunch more options. Mine was done sous vide, but it could be ideal for roasting since you can arrange it so that the dark meat (that can handle more heat) is on the outside while the white meat is protected within.

  9. Am I allowed to let off a discrete raspberry after I close the door behind them tomorrow morning? :raz:

    Absolutely. But, IMHO, there are reasons we do these things discretely.

    Without the other side of the story we don't know the whole story. Perhaps he was waiting for an opportunity to brag to your husband about his conquest of a lithesome young karate-ette. Perhaps he wanted to ask your husband for a loan. Maybe he just isn't a morning person. Or, perhaps he feels uncomfortable being catered to.

    Here's a link to a seminar speaker who prefers to stay in peoples houses (rather than a hotel), but comes with a particularly long set of care instructions (scroll down to the end to get to the food stuff).

  10. How many contestants are they starting with?

    For the first-time ever, season nine will boast a record 29 chefs -- almost double the amount of chefs in season’s past -- who will see if they have what it takes to become an official cheftestant and qualify to wear the Top Chef coat. Only 16 will go on to compete across the Lone Star State

    I don't think this bodes well. 'All Stars' was great because we didn't have to learn about all the contestants in an hour. With 29 contestants, we'll have about two minutes with each - less commercial time, and announcer/promotional time. Let's call it 42 seconds unless they do a 2 hour premier or something.

  11. I had one today for lunch. It seems like they changed the bread from what I recall (your typical supermarket hoagie bun). Now it's more like the bread Arby's uses for their French Dip. A dry (but not crispy) exterior with cornmeal residue. This made the whole thing seem a bit too dry, despite the potentially messy slathering of BBQ sauce.

    I think that if they added some coleslaw (or something) and returned to the softer bun they might have something. For me, a Big Mac works because the just-average meat only has to play a supporting role to other layers/flavors/textures. But here we have only molded pork, BBQ sauce, some grated onions, and a couple of pickle slices, and dryish bread.

    Meh.

  12. Interesting, but I'm with a number of the people who commented. Cream in Risotto? Properly cooked risotto is more than creamy enough by itself. Adding cream can only be needed to cover up a fault in the preparation.

    Call me a Philistine, but I support freedom of ingredients based on the inequality of the concepts 'Creamy' (textural) and 'With Cream' (taste and texture). And if adding cream can cover up a fault, where is the fault (other than perhaps more fat than is necessary)? If I can choose to put fresh peas in my risotto, why not cream?

    Having tried many risottos in restaurants and inevitably being very disappointed, I always wonder what baseline people use for taste tests for this dish.

    This sentiment leaves me very skeptical of the traditional dogma. Previously, I had only suspicions. But having never had a risotto not made by me, I can't be a judge. So I'll also be curious as to whether it passes muster with risotto afficianados.

  13. Thanks, all. Some good ideas. I had planned volume to weight conversions. My only question there is how comprehensive I try to be with an ingredient density database.

    With my current plan I should be able to trump KichenCalculator in at least a couple of different ways. But I'll remain a bit cagey for now.

    Substitutions are something I thought of originally but forgot, so thanks for that.

    Baker's formulas are a great idea and I can already see how it can fit in.

    I'm also thinking about links to eGullet, pizzamaking.com, The Fresh Loaf, etc. I'm not exactly sure why, other than wanting to promote good sites. I'm still trying to figure out what my criteria would be and why. I don't really see a need to link to say, foodnetwork.com or epicurious, but then again, why wouldn't I? Maybe if I come up with a categorization scheme....

  14. I've decided to try my hand at developing an app for Windows Phone 7. It will be a Kitchen Reference app targeted at intermediate home cooks, with a battery of kitchen timers, a page for unit conversion and scaling, and some other features. I'm in the process of deciding what else it will do, and perhaps more importantly, what it won't.

    What I'd like to specifically avoid are recipe collections. I already have, for instance, a free Epicurious app that can serve up better content than I could ever come up with. I don't think I want it to manage one's personal recipe collections (perhaps that's a separate app).

    I would however, like to include a number of quasi-standard recipe ingredient proportions for American kitchen staples. For instance, I don't make crepes often enough to have memorized the ingredients and proportions. But when I do make crepes, I don't need full instructions, I just need the proportions.

    Another feature will most likely be time & temps. A list of charts showing rare, medium, well temps, along with rule of thumb roasting times. Perhaps a list of meat cuts and recommended cooking methods (roast, braise, etc.)

    And what about an Ad supported free app versus a $0.99 or $1.99 app? For me, a free app is much more likely to get installed, but I know I'm not a typical consumer.

    Does anyone have any other ideas and/or opinions?

  15. Okayyyyy, if you insist

    How Food Preferences Vary by Political Ideology

    http://hunch.com/media/reports/food/

    This is kind of interesting but doesn't seem to address fish and is, I think, at least partially flawed. Because, IMHO, it seems to oversimplify 'Conservative' and 'Liberal'.

    I started a thread once here about the Meyers Briggs Personality Inventory and how it might relate to our food preferences. But it turned out that the respondents to the thread were all of a few certain personality types like my own that liked that sort analysis. Apart from this, I was curious as to how one's personality preferences might shape political views and found some web pages that had done some polling.

    I expected to find that liberals would favor feeling over thinking and that conservatives would be the opposite. Instead, I found that it wasn't quite so simple. In general, with some (of the 16) types there seemed to be a clear correlation, but not so with other types.

    I looked deeper and at least two models of conservatism seemed to emerge: Rules-based feeling conservatives ("My momma always said..."), and thought-based conservatives ("These levels of spending are not sustainable..."). I suspect that an inclusion of these divisions on the conservative and liberal side might've muddied the results. It also raises questions about whther the questions that were asked to identify affiliation were biased based on assumptions.

    But I think that regionality is looking like a better predictor of fish preference than anything else so far.

  16. I think it's a familiarity thing. My hypothesis is that you develop a sense of 'normal' early on in your life. This is why we have fierce supporters of, say, New York Pizza vs. Chicago Pizza vs. Detroit Pizza, etc., etc..

    In my case, I grew up in Detroit at a time when it wasn't generally wise to eat anything out of the lakes. Meanwhile, an uncle in the UP was fishing Lake Superior nearly every day of his life. It was there that I had my first experience eating truly fresh fish. So while I haven't had a lot of seafood, I'm definitely seafood curious (lobster, crab and shrimp are my favorites).

    My wife, however, grew up in western Illinois. Other than the annual catfish fry, there wasn't much happening fish-wise. She now has a one shrimp per year rule. I think for people who grow up eating beef and pork and chicken, the texture of seafood just doesn't seem right.

    That said, I think there's a huge seafood culture in America on the east, west, and gulf coasts, no?

  17. I think what this discussion can be boiled down to (or sous vided in 12 hours ) is the whether what is technically possible makes a significant and positive difference in the food experience.

    Once, on successive nights, I served beef filet. The first night I did a traditional preparation, and on the second I did sous vide. To me, there were plusses and minuses to each, so I asked my wife (who had not seen me cook either). She preferred the second night's steak (sous vide). Still, subsequently she made it clear that she'd rather I'd do it in the traditional manner. So there's a big perception factor.

    As others have said, sous vide need not be expensive, slow, or complicated. My sous vide setup centers around a $40 Presto Kitchen Kettle (which we already had), a FoodSaver (which I received as a Christmas gift), and a Thermapen (which was on my Christmas list). The only penalty is some time spent stabilizing the temperature.

    Sous vide can take seconds. IIRC, Keller's poached lobster is overcooked after 15 minutes. Some very thinly sliced filet (as for an Arby's style sandwich) can be cooked to perfect med rare in a minute or two - even from frozen. Can't do that in a pan.

    But for me, a big part of it is just adding to my arsenal and understanding, and having a proven theoretical model when I'm trying something unique.

  18. I was just browsing the site trying to get a feel for what it was all about. I clicked on a story (read: Recipe) on a gruyere and chanterelle grilled cheese. At the bottom were comments. The first discussion involved someone saying they were adding chanterelles to their grocery list, followed by someone asking where he could find chanterelles (Not sure if he missed the hyperlink or was being funny). This was followed by someone helpfully informing him where he could source chanterelles locally.

    Ah well, perhaps if this doesn't work out then Ruth can write the Trader Joe's Fearless Flyer.

    [Edit]Removed redundant 'perhaps'

  19. Is the traditional egg shape a must? I've long been thinking about (in a slightly different application) separating the whites and yolks and cooking them separately, then reconstructing the components.

    This would require a custom tray mold to SV the whites into some sort of cup form and cooking the yolks separately. Then you just unmold the molded white, fill with cooked yolk, garnish, and serve.

    Besides being able come up whimsical shapes (An egg cube? An egg white shot class filled with yolk?), you could individually season the components and completely sidestep the difficult issues involved with managing the temps of two different components in one package.

    An egg's shape may be very classical, but is it the most practical shape for plating? I'd think that a flat bottom alone could be a huge plus.

  20. ... I also don't know what you think MC will teach me.

    C'mon, I'm sure that even you might learn something! :smile:

    I've got room for plenty of learning, especially about jaw muscles being cheeks apparently. I've also got room for MC, when I feel that I can make the investment. But when someone posts a reference to a chapter of a tome I (or most of us, for that matter) don't have, I don't know what it's meant to mean.

    "Aha, V2, Ch3, Pg 336!"

    "Yeah, but V3, Ch2, Pg 202, paragraph 3. Got you there!" :huh:

  21. That wasn't a quote from the book, I was just suggesting you look at it for information.

    Well, okay, perhaps a glance at Homer's Odyssey will help you (with what? I don't know. But I also don't know what you think MC will teach me.)

    A beef cheek is the facial cheek (Masseteric) muscle of a cow. What doesn't it have to do with moving the jaw?

    I believe you're confusing googled masseteric references with actual animals. Bessie's cheeks aren't responsible for her most dangerous bite force.

×
×
  • Create New...