Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create a free account.

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm wondering why you're having this sort of response from your starter. Are you using only flour and water? Or are you using something else as well. If you're using only flour and water, there shouldn't be a mold issue at all (or not that I can imagine).

I refrigerate my starter (flour and water) in a canning jar with the usual screw top lid. It's the method Ed Wood (Classic Sourdoughs) suggests.

I got the mold on a batch made with the raisins and yoghurt, so hopefully it shouldn't be an issue next time around. :smile:

restaurant, private catering, consultancy
feast for the senses / blog

Posted (edited)

Starter storage jar. Can't say I do anything special. Mostly it gets forgotten between bakes (weeks) and the hooch layer seperates. Don't seem to have a mold problem. I suspect they are worse with young starters. Once they are mature they are very tough.

gallery_7620_135_9738.jpggallery_7620_135_590.jpg

Edited by jackal10 (log)
Posted
! use only plain unbleached  flour and water in my starter, My view is that adding raisins, yogurt, grapes, old boots, or anything else just makes it take longer to reach a stable culture. You can use rye if you want a rye culture.

I always cover the starter in the fridge. I keep it in a canning jar with a clip on lid ("le parfait") http://thecookskitchen.com/browse_2553 . These are designed to gas out, but not in, but snapwrap would do just as well.

Most of the flavour is added from the preferment, not the main dough, so if you want sour bread ferment out the preferment for longer, like 24 hours.

I would like to add that it can be beneficial to a sluggish starter to displace 5% of the bread flour with rye flour for one or two feeding cycles to reinvigorate the activity.

In addition, some bakers will start a culture with half rye and half bread flour, and wean the culture of the rye as feedings progress to speed things up.

I concur with jackal10, as always, that a culture is best made with flour and water; nothing else is necessary, or desirable for that matter.

Posted

I'm wondering why you're having this sort of response from your starter. Are you using only flour and water? Or are you using something else as well. If you're using only flour and water, there shouldn't be a mold issue at all (or not that I can imagine).

I refrigerate my starter (flour and water) in a canning jar with the usual screw top lid. It's the method Ed Wood (Classic Sourdoughs) suggests.

I got the mold on a batch made with the raisins and yoghurt, so hopefully it shouldn't be an issue next time around. :smile:

Egad!... Next time, yes, only flour and water, and keep the raisins and yogurt for breakfast. :biggrin:

Posted
Starter storage jar. Can't say I do anything special. Mostly it gets forgotten between bakes (weeks) and the hooch layer seperates. Don't seem to have a mold problem. I suspect they are worse with young starters. Once they are mature they are very tough.

gallery_7620_135_9738.jpggallery_7620_135_590.jpg

Now there's a pretty picture. Looks much like my jar of culture, paste and all.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
! use only plain unbleached  flour and water in my starter, My view is that adding raisins, yogurt, grapes, old boots, or anything else just makes it take longer to reach a stable culture. You can use rye if you want a rye culture.

I always cover the starter in the fridge. I keep it in a canning jar with a clip on lid ("le parfait") http://thecookskitchen.com/browse_2553 . These are designed to gas out, but not in, but snapwrap would do just as well.

Most of the flavour is added from the preferment, not the main dough, so if you want sour bread ferment out the preferment for longer, like 24 hours.

I would like to add that it can be beneficial to a sluggish starter to displace 5% of the bread flour with rye flour for one or two feeding cycles to reinvigorate the activity.

In addition, some bakers will start a culture with half rye and half bread flour, and wean the culture of the rye as feedings progress to speed things up.

I concur with jackal10, as always, that a culture is best made with flour and water; nothing else is necessary, or desirable for that matter.

Hmmm - lots of recipes suggest grapes, raisins - or even potato peelings - but they have never workewd for me either. The only thing that did was using some natural yoghurt as suggested by dan lepard. I think that some additional acitdity helps to prevent mold - and I've read somewhere that a little pineapple juice works well - but can't say for sure.

My current starter has been going for about a year - has been left in the fridge for months on end in the middle - and now is plit between our flat & a shared holiday house - seems to revive very well... It makes very nice medium sour white bread - and is working nicely at the moment for the BBA Pain Poilaine.

dan

Posted (edited)
my starter started this way but after a week or two it started having a good smell and has been great ever since. So I think you are on the right track.

Michael - Hope the bread turned out well! When I don't have a banneton to hand I just use a bowl lined with a linen tea-towel dusted with flower. Works really well for me.

dan

Edited by DanielBerman (log)
Posted

It seems to me that my sourdough starter died on me. I suspect some condition made the culture inhabitable for the yeast or something. My sponges all smell and taste sour, but no froth or nice layer of bubbles on the top.

My doughs dont rise anymore, and 12 hours is needed for a sponge to almost double. I suspect all the Co2 I get is from the LB. bacteria.

I usually use about 40g of my starter culture to about 200g of flour for my sponge. Should I try to make a sponge with my entire batch of starter? When I feed it, it looks kind of promising, it's the sponges that doesn't "take off" like before. The anemic sponges is completely usless as a leavining agent, and every baking atemt goes down the drain! (I feel so sorry for myself now! *grin*)

Have anyone recovered from such a situation? Start over?

Posted

All I can say is that I made a completely useless atempt at building a starter from Apple peel... I'll never go down that road again. It was hard work I tell'ya! :-)

Posted
All I can say is that I made a completely useless atempt at building a starter from Apple peel... I'll never go down that road again. It was hard work I tell'ya! :-)

My starter is OK, but just as an experiment, I'm thinking about making the "barm" from BBA, starting with only rye. It will be interesting to see how it compares with the starter that I already have. :wink:

Just a simple southern lady lost out west...

"Leave Mother in the fridge in a covered jar between bakes. No need to feed her." Jackal10

Posted
It seems to me that my sourdough starter died on me. I suspect some condition made the culture inhabitable for the yeast or something. My sponges all smell and taste sour, but no froth or nice layer of bubbles on the top.

My doughs dont rise anymore, and 12 hours is needed for a sponge to almost double. I suspect all the Co2 I get is from the LB. bacteria.

I usually use about 40g of my starter culture to about 200g of flour for my sponge. Should I try to make a sponge with my entire batch of starter? When I feed it, it looks kind of promising, it's the sponges that doesn't "take off" like before. The anemic sponges is completely usless as a leavining agent, and every baking atemt goes down the drain! (I feel so sorry for myself now! *grin*)

Have anyone recovered from such a situation? Start over?

Of course, you could start over.... But I would try to rescue the starter by multiple feedings to see if I could get it to regain its robust nature. I just cringe when I think of throwing it out... My starter is like a member of my family (Oh my, I'm a sad case aren't I?) :huh:

Just a simple southern lady lost out west...

"Leave Mother in the fridge in a covered jar between bakes. No need to feed her." Jackal10

Posted
It seems to me that my sourdough starter died on me. I suspect some condition made the culture inhabitable for the yeast or something. My sponges all smell and taste sour, but no froth or nice layer of bubbles on the top.

My doughs dont rise anymore, and 12 hours is needed for a sponge to almost double. I suspect all the Co2 I get is from the LB. bacteria.

I usually use about 40g of my starter culture to about 200g of flour for my sponge. Should I try to make a sponge with my entire batch of starter? When I feed it, it looks kind of promising, it's the sponges that doesn't "take off" like before. The anemic sponges is completely usless as a leavining agent, and every baking atemt goes down the drain! (I feel so sorry for myself now! *grin*)

Have anyone recovered from such a situation? Start over?

I would do as Cajungirl suggested for the recovery of your starter. I would suggest that you use about 80g of starter to 200g of flour for your sponge, this represents 40% starter in bakers terms but as for the overall sponge percentage it will reduce to about 25%, and this is within the recommended range.

Kind regards

Bill

Posted

After 26 years of baking sourdough and experimenting along the way with all forms of making starters, I have found that for me just flour and water is the most reliable method. Whether you start with unbleached white flour or rye flour is up to you, be prepared to have a failure or two along the way, and be patient with feeding your new starter until it is truly strong, I usually advise not to bake with a new starter until it is at least 3 weeks old.

You will find that there is sufficient wild yeast in the flour, captured as the grain is growing, to innoculate your starter, and if you leave it in an open bowl near an open window it should capture enough of the local lactobacillus variety to quickly innoculate your starter and provide protection.

Kind regards

Bill

Posted (edited)
My starter is like a member of my family (Oh my, I'm a sad case aren't I?)

No No , you are not a sad case , my husband call my sourdough starters ,the "sour babies", because they are my little babies I have to attend and yes I would to try to revive my sourdough as well,"never give up never surrender".

:laugh::raz:

And here I would like to ask the experts, the fact that Glenn sourdough lost strenght could be because his starter was made of grapes?( where they grapes or apples??) Apples I think :huh: .I have seen some of the experts here saying that the better starters are from flour and water and nothing else , because the fruit or whatever else you feed it it wont last too long etc?Is that possible ?

Thank you , just for info I was actually thinking about this matter not long ago.

Edited by Desiderio (log)

Vanessa

Posted

I would do as Cajungirl suggested for the recovery of your starter. I would suggest that you use about 80g of starter to 200g of flour for your sponge, this represents 40% starter in bakers terms but as for the overall sponge percentage it will reduce to about 25%, and this is within the recommended range.

Thanks bill, I'll try that. I'l lalso start feeding and stiring my stater every day for a while and see how it goes. It's been along since my first futile sourdough experiments back in April, so I've gotten quite attached to it :-)

My wife doesn't understand that I'm reluctant to flush it down like a dead goldfish... How strange :-)

Posted
My wife doesn't understand that I'm reluctant to flush it down like a dead goldfish... How strange :-)

Starters are strange things, and having a whole family of them I can vouch for the fact that they have their individual likes and dislikes. I went into this subject in some depth on another forum, but for the sake of brevity I'll just say that some of my starters prefer to be kept at 100% hydration, some at 166%, some are quite happy with feeding at 24 hour intervals, and one that gets positively sulky if it is not fed every 12 hours.

May I suggest that, if you have the time, you experiment to find the most favourable condititions and feeding regimen for your starter. You may find the time spent to be very rewarding.

Kind regards

Bill

Posted

Out of all the sourdough stuff I've read over the past few years, only one source has recommended using anything but flour and water for making and maintaining a sourdough culture (Nancy Silverton -- the grapes method) .

It's my experience too, that the development of flavor takes awhile. Like months. Or weeks, anyway. To try to boost the actual culture with anything else will probably just keep your culture from developing properly in the long run. I tried that myself in the beginning and ended up throwing it out finally, even when it seemed to work in the short term.

I know a number of bakers who are in the artisan bread business (as am I), and that's how we all do it. Flour and water. We each have different ways of using the actual culture and maintaining it, but the one thing that doesn't vary is the basic composition of the culture itself. One bakery refreshes its sourdough three times a day, another refreshes four times a day, currently I refresh mine once a day, and others have other schedules that work for them.

Posted

Close to where I live, a low-price grocery store has temaed up with a local company called "French bakery" to sell fresh baked 100% hand made sourdough bread. Nice!

I tasted one of their loaves yesterday, and the "sour" taste was very subtle. Almost like a regular loaf, with the sourdough only used as a leavening agent. (With the regular benefits of extended shelf life etc. of course).

How is this done? Is it a "quick" loaf? Less time gives less by-products (Aceatic acid, right?) Or does the starter cultures just produce different kind of tasting bread? (I cannot really see how this is possible from a scientific point of view!)

Posted
Close to where I live, a low-price grocery store has temaed up with a local company called "French bakery" to sell fresh baked 100% hand made sourdough bread.  Nice!

I tasted one of their loaves yesterday, and  the "sour" taste was very subtle. Almost like a regular loaf, with the sourdough only used as a leavening agent. (With the regular benefits of extended shelf life etc. of course).

How is this done? Is it a "quick" loaf? Less time gives less by-products (Aceatic acid, right?) Or does the starter cultures just produce different kind of tasting bread? (I cannot really see how this is possible from a scientific point of view!)

This is what I keep telling people who express reservations about "sourdough," people who think the sourdough they've been buying is real sourdough as opposed to the sourdough flavoring that too many commercial breadbakers try to pass off as genuine sourdough breads, and which also use commercial yeast in conjunction with the "sourdough" flavoring agents.

And it's why I use the term "naturally-leavened" more than I use the term "sourdough," because too many people mistake the term. The term "sourdough" is simply misunderstood too often as meaning "sour" or very strong tasting bread. It's not. Or not necessarily.

And so people are very surprised when they discover my breads have a soft, lovely flavor, not "sour."

I love my sourdough starter and I love really good sourdoughs that aren't "sour." I also use the long fermentations (two days), so these aren't quick breads at all.

Posted

my loaves don't come out very sour at all. I don't know why. I wouldn't mind more sour.

I mix the dough and use perhaps 20% sourdough poolish, then I refrigerate immediately and retard for 1 or 2 days. Then I bulk ferment at cool room temperature, proof and bake. It doesn't taste very sour although it is delicious. I would love more sour flavor in it (naturally of course.)

Posted

If you want a sour loaf ferment out the preferment sponge more.

Most of the flavour comes from the preferment, rather than from the dough step. You can adjust the parameters (e.g. 90F, 50% hydration) to give optimum flavour during peferement. During the dough step you need conditions to give optimum rise instead.

Posted

I totally agree that sourdough does no equal "sour", and that "naturally leavened" is a much better term. Most of my SD bread come out in the "middle range", based on what I have tasted so far.

Jack; thanks for the tip about the preferment being the major factor in sourness. I'll experiment with some parameters, and see if I can produce different results.

The thing that struck me with the loaf I tasted from my grocery store, was that I couldn't have, by blind tasting, decided if it was a SD or not. It contained Rye that also have a slight sourness to it, so I could have mistaken it for that...

Posted
My starter is like a member of my family (Oh my, I'm a sad case aren't I?)

No No , you are not a sad case , my husband call my sourdough starters ,the "sour babies", because they are my little babies I have to attend and yes I would to try to revive my sourdough as well,"never give up never surrender".

:laugh::raz:

And here I would like to ask the experts, the fact that Glenn sourdough lost strenght could be because his starter was made of grapes?( where they grapes or apples??) Apples I think :huh: .I have seen some of the experts here saying that the better starters are from flour and water and nothing else , because the fruit or whatever else you feed it it wont last too long etc?Is that possible ?

Thank you , just for info I was actually thinking about this matter not long ago.

I have rescued starters like this this before. I would have 2 tips -

1. You want to 'wash' the starter - so empty more than half of the starter out, and re-feed to full size, every six hours (if you can) for couple of days. This can help to get rid of any contaminants.

2. Then feed every 12-24 hours to really get the culture active again. Once its really frothing you should be good to go again.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I was wondering if someone could help me out - I'm making my first-ever starter following the Nancy Silverton method (organic grapes in cheesecloth). At day three, my starter smells very strongly of cheese and is very liquidy. I decided this is bad, so I tossed the grapes and started feeding it. I'm wondering:

1. am I right in assuming this is bad?

2. and if so, what could have gone wrong?

3. should I attempt to fix it or should I start over?

Any advice would be greatly appreciated. :smile:

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...