Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create a free account.

Martha Stewart for Macys


Pucca

Recommended Posts

I have an enameled cast iron pot from her line that has worked out well so far, especially given the reasonable price point. I was at Macy's last week and saw that many of her pots and pans were on clearance. I was curious to know if anyone here has any experience with her stainless steel or non-stick pans. The reviews on Macy's website seem pretty decent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have 2 pieces of MS stainless. One is a 2 3/4 quart saute pan and the other a small saucepan. Both were from a charity store. I find them to be perfectly adequate. In the past, however, I had a very large MS saute pan which warped soon after its first encounter with a very hot oven!

Anna Nielsen aka "Anna N"

...I just let people know about something I made for supper that they might enjoy, too. That's all it is. (Nigel Slater)

"Cooking is about doing the best with what you have . . . and succeeding." John Thorne

Our 2012 (Kerry Beal and me) Blog

My 2004 eG Blog

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used a few of the stainless with aluminum disk bottom pans at a vacation house. There were a couple of saucepans and a medium and large saute pan. I thought they were surprisingly good. I used the saute pans on the stove and as roasting pans in a 500 degree oven with no issues.

I actually like them better than some commercial lines, like Sitram and Paderno. On the Martha Stewart pans, the disk bottom tapers at the edge and covers the entire bottom of the pan. On a lot of disk bottom pans, the disk leaves a pretty big gap at the edge. If you don't keep a close watch on the flame (especially tricky on home stoves that spread the flame out to the sides instead of projecting it straight up) you end up with a nasty hot spot all around the outside rim.

Some disadvantages to the M.S. pans are that the stainless steel is flimsier than on the pro pans, and the lids are glass. The glass is conventient, but in my kitchen its lifespan would be about ten minutes.

I found another line of pans that has a nice disk bottom and is roughly in the Martha Stewart price range: Optio by Lincoln. It's their budget line. Big benefit is that you don't have to have something in your kitchen with a "Martha Stewart" logo (I'd pay a premium for this feature alone).

Edited by paulraphael (log)

Notes from the underbelly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...