slkinsey

Hi Matthew. If you're looking for non-potable bitters and you already have Fee Brothers, Peychaud's and Angostura in mind -- well, that's about it as far as I know. This is, sadly, how far the use of bitters has fallen. Although we've been hearing for what seems like a year that Gary Regan's Orange Bitters No. 6 will be on sale any minute now, I wouldn't hold my breath. When it does come on sale, however, you should definitely stock it. The other bitters available to the cocktail enthuisiast tend to be either vintage examples purchased on eBay or homemade reproductions of defunct brands.

Just to clarify a few points made here: 1. Silver has excellent thermal conductivity. This is one reason why the best Sterling tea and coffee services have a piece of ceramic or other insulating material between the body of the pot and the handle -- otherwise the handle would become too hot to hold. This excellent thermal conuctivity also means that heat is conducted out of the pot very efficiently. As a result, hot tea in a silver teapot will actually cool off more rapidly than hot tea in a ceramic teapot (ceramic has very low thermal conductivity). 2. Silver has relatively low reactivity to things like pure air and water, but it does react with sulfir and sulfides to create silver sulfide -- aka silver tarnish. Silver sulfide, while not very pretty, is actually highly insoluble in aqueous (watery) solutions, so it is probably good advice to not polish the inside of a silver teapot. 3. Most of the reactivity of sterling silver comes from the 7.5% of (highly reactive) copper that is usually the other metal in the mix. This is why silver tarnishes less as purity goes up. Any "metalic" taste is likely to come from the copper.

Hmmmm... I'll have to whip up some fried chicken this week. My recipe is something like this: Marinade the chicken in Red Devil hot sauce in the morning, pour in buttermilk in the evening, fry the next afternoon. Remove the chicken pieces (usually mostly thighs) from the buttermilk and dredge in a simple mixture of flour, pepper and Old Bay seasoning. The Red Devil has plenty of salt, so additional is usually not needed. Let the dredged pieces sit for at least 30 minutes to adhere the coating to the chicken. Shallow fry at 350F in bacon fat and lard. Drain on cooling racks. Eat warm but not hot.

I've recently become aware of Kensington Gin, made by Liquid International Permium Spirits. It's interesting because, unlike any other gin of which I am aware, it is an aged product. It's an interesting concept. Anyone tried it?

I was searching around the 'net today and came across a very interesting web site called "Molecular Expressions - Exploring the World of Optics and Microscopy." Here's how they describe themselves: Among the many cool photographs they have is an entire gallery of liquor and cocktail photographs. Ever wonder what a Mint Julep looks like on a molecular level? How about Scotch on the Rocks?

Cala, this isn't really a question I can answer very well, unfortunately. When you begin a recipe, you have to have some understanding of what amount of food you are going to be making. In general, however, you will find that most any pot will do just fine when only half full. So, if you have a recipe that calls for two quarts of liquid plus some other stuff, you won't find that a 4 quart pot is too big. In general, you never want to fill a pot all the way. For example, if I want to make a quart of something bechamel, I'll do that in my 2.5 quart saucepan rather than my 1 quart saucepan. When it comes to purchasing cookware, this is where you have to really give some thought to the amounts you usually prepare. If, for example, you don't tend to make sauces (or melt chocolate, etc.) in the 0.5 - 0.75 quart range, there is probably little reason to have a fancy 1 quart saucepan. (A 1 quart saucepan is one of those pans that is used a lot on restaurants where dishes are prepared in individual portions, but most home cooking styles won't find it very useful.)

I always tip on the total bill and have always thought it was strange to care about this. Let's assume, for a moment, that the bill is for $250 per person before tax. NY State tax (8.625%) on that would be $21.56. So, assuming that you want to tip 20%, if you tip on the pre-tax amount, you're tipping 50 bucks. If you tip on the after-tax amount, you're tipping 54 bucks. For me, I don't think the difference between 300 bucks and 304 bucks is worth bothing about. It's also worthy of note that the difference between pre- and after-tax calculation on a $100 bill tipped at 20% is $1.70, and the difference gets smaller and smaller as the bill goes down.

Pisang Ambon is an Indonesian liqueur? I thought it was from the Netherlands. Green banana flavored... hmm... can't say that it will be high on my list. Anyway, as far as I know, it is not available in the States. Here is their web site.

This week's NY Times Food Section just so happened to have a bit on aquavit (the spirit) and Aquavit (the restaurant). Hakan Swan, an owner of the restaurant Aquavit and the guy who commissioned the Aquavit New York brand, says they wanted an aquavit with softer caraway to make the spirit more compatible with mixing in cocktails. That makes sense. He also says they made it low proof (only 70) to make it "easier to drink." That, I'm not so sure about. For mixing, I'd rather see a higher proof. What are some other aquavits out there and available? Here in NY, we have: Aalborg aquavit OP Anderson aquavit Lysholm Linie aquavit (which is aged in oak sherry casks) Aquavit New York Anyone mixed with these?

I've been thinking a bit about aquavit lately. Gin is my favorite cocktail liquor. And what is gin? It's more or less juniper-plus-other-stuff-flavored neutral spirits. Well, what is aquavit? It's more or less caraway-plus-other-stuff-flavored neutral spirits. So, I thought, why aren't we making lots of cool cocktails with aquavit? In fact, wouldn't a lot of gin formulae work fairly interestingly with aquavit? Say, for example, aquavit, maraschino and lemon juice. CocktailDB has a mere 18 cocktails with aquavit, which is a good place to start but we ought to be able to do better than that. I have to do some experimenting, but would love to hear other thoughts on this.

Here's a bottle of it here. What do you know... I've walked right by it and not recognized it as being the same thing. They apparently have it at Astor Wines for around $18/bottle. Funny... I was just getting ready to start a thread on Aquavit cocktails. Hope you can share a few secrets.

D'oh! There's already a Belmont Cocktail (1.5 oz gin, 1 oz cream, 0.25 oz raspberry syrup). One of the great dangers of naming a cocktail. Cool idea you have there, though. Kind of like a dry martini with Amontillado sherry filling in for dry vermouth. Maybe a Belmont Street Cocktail?

Kina Lillet is the old name for Lillet Blanc. I honestly doubt you'll taste a difference by using grain vodka. But if you want to try one, get a bottle of Smirnoff. It ranked #1 in a taste test recently.

Julia, can you still get OP? In NYC? Where?

Welcome to the eG Forums comic4879. I'm not sure you've fairly or accurately interpreted Janet's remarks about Alberta Straub. Janet is a cocktail aficionado with not a small amount of knowledge and appreciation of this craft. So I think I can categorically say that she's not interested in the "awful sugary factory made drinks" they're slinging at the local Applebee's. If you read her comments, I think you'll see that she characterizes Alberta's cocktails as "wonderful" but has some issues with respect to her efficiency and speed. This is a legitimate criticism, although I gather that it is not an element of her craft that bothers you. We'd love to hear more of what you have to say about Alberta Straub's craft and talent, but I don't think we need to imply that anyone who takes issue with her efficiency and speed is a philistine with pedestrian taste in cocktails.

Cool, one follow up question: I live in NYC and with the mountain of cookware I already have, multiple tagines is not a possibility. I am thinking of using it primarily on the stovetop. It seems that, if I were going to go for one all-purpose tagine, it might be better to have the heavier unglazed style? Would that be something like this? In re to the rounded bottom, is this something I could put over (low) direct heat on my gas stove, or would I still need to use a diffuser? Does the rounded bottom style really work with a diffuser, do you think? Also, is it just me, or does the thicker rounded style have a significantly smaller/shorter "chimney?" Does this make much of a difference? Okay... that's more than one question.

This is cool. I find myself wanting one. Paula: what style of tagine to you most recommend? I note that you say above that "Southern Moroccan tagines are rarely glazed inside or out but have a lot of mica inthe clay which makes them very strong and heavy. . . The Riffian one is light in weight; the local clay isn't as strong." I gather that unglazed is the way to go? Any suggestions?

Interesting. I've never seen it that way, with Vialone Nano supposedly last in quality. My impression has always been that Arborio and Vialone Nano were the traditional rices, and approximately equal in inherrent quality. Arborio is a softer rice more appropriate for the creamy Lombardia/Emilia-Romagna/Piemonte style of risotto while Vialone Nano is a toothier rice best suited for the soupy Veneto/Fruili style. They are completely different, and neither one is entirely satisfactory when used in the other's style. It is worth noting that the creamy style is by far the most common in the US, with the "sull' onda" style being virtually unknown over here (it's actually the style I prefer for seafood risotto). It people have the perception that Arborio is "better" than Vialone Nano, that may be part of the reason: they're not using the Vialone Nano correctly. Carnaroli is a hybrid of Vialone Nano and Japanese sushi rice. It was designed to be in the middle between Arborio and Vialone Nano: both creamy and al-dente at the same time. It's okay and easier to work with than Arborio. But if I am making a creamy risotto, I'd rather just use Arborio and pay attention. I should point out that these three rices are not the only kids on the block. There are other varieties suitable for risotto, like Superfino Baldo.

Gary Regan tells us of the Coco Cocktail, a drink created for Brasserie 8 1/2 by bar manager Cory Hill: Here's the recipe: 2 oz : Pisco brandy 1 oz : chocolate liqueur (Godiva, Mozart and Vermeer are mentioned) 1 oz : chilled espresso Shake well with cracked ice, strain into a chilled cocktail glass and garnish with a lemon twist. Sounds interesting. I'll have to give it a try, as I have a bottle of Godiva I've been wanting to get rid of for years.

Here is some of it. Not that interesting, unfortunately. The rest of it is all "original recipe" this and "old tradition" that.

It still depends on common perception. There are several parts to this question: 1. Has the quality of the steak at Peter Luger substantially declined? 2. If yes, is the common perception of the Peter Luger that the steak there is just as good as it was in the 70s? If no, then it is not over rated on this basis. If yes, then we are one step closer to over rated. I doubt this figures particularly highly, because very few people are in a position to make that comparison and few are making it. 3. Does Peter Luger serve, on average, the best steaks by far? 4. If no, is the common perception that they do? If yes, then we're closer to over rated. 5. Here is the tough part: you have to ask yourself whether it's just you. If it's just you, then you can really only say that it's over rated for you. At some point, though, if person after person and trusted critic after trusted critic says that it's still head and shoulders above the rest. . . then you have to start maybe accepting that you're just getting a different read on the place and chalk it up to personal preference. Well, that depends. It depends on whether Landmarc would keep its reputation with the general public (or whatever group you're looking at) were the prices to go up by roughly double. My strong suspicion is that it wouldn't. The only way Landmarc could be over rated according to your hypothetical is if a substantial portion of its reputation concerns low prices, and if it kept the reputation for low prices despite a substantial increase. It would be over rated with respect to the prices in that case. If, on the other hand, the reputation of Landmarc as a restaurant with a particularly felicitous pricing structure were to change with their increased prices but the reputation of the food served there remained the same, it's hard to see how this would constitute "over rated." By the very nature of the word "over rated," the only way something can be over rated is if it is rated higher than it deserves. For something to be over rated in the general sense means that it has to have a rating of X among a certain population (the general public, eGullet members, food critics, whatever) when it actually deserves a rating of X-y.

I think you can't go wrong with a DIY "interesting meats tasting menu." Babbo does some of the best in the City. Antipasti: Warm Tripe alla Parmigiana Pig Foot Milanese with Rice Beans and Arugula Warm Lamb's Tongue Vinaigrette with Hedgehogs, and a 3-Minute Egg Testa with Pickled Pearls and Thyme Vinaigrette Primi: Lamb's Brain "Francobolli" with Lemon and Sage Goose Liver Ravioli with Balsamic Vinegar and Brown Butter Beef Cheek Ravioli with Crushed Squab Liver and Black Truffles Mint Love Letters with Spicy Lamb Sausage Secondi: Barbecued Squab with Roasted Beet Farroto and Porcini Mustard Grilled Quail with “Scorzonero alla Romana” and Saba "Rabbit alla Triestina" with with Red Cabbage, Potatoes and Horseradish Fennel Dusted Sweetbreads with Quince Vinegar and Duck Bacon

I'm not quite sure everyone shares your definition of "over rated." I think the standard interpretation of "over rated" would be "significantly not as good as it is commonly held to be." In your Landmarc example, for example, it sounds like it would be over priced but perhaps not over rated. Similarly, if Tasting Room eliminated its wonderful wine list or if L'impero's food preparation slipped, these places would only be over rated if the generally accepted perception of their quality remained the same. This is the point that Steven makes upthread: Before you decide that a place is over rated, you have to have some understanding of where it is commonly understood to be "rated" in the first place. Further, ErinB makes a good point in that you should have an understanding of the population that is doing the "rating." Are we talking about places that are eGullet favorites or that are popular with tourists and businesspeople? Beyond that, I think you have to take personal preference into account, because there may be a restaurant that is not personally to your taste but which nevertheless achieves at a high level and deserves its good reputation.

I don't know of any fancy restaurant that pours anything near 5 ounces of vodka into a martini, there is very little vermouth. I think that would wipe out their customers, before they even start their meals. It would contain the alcohol equivalent of two thirds of a bottle of wine. The total volume of a martini, I don't know how large it is, contains some ice melt. I think that even 2.5 ounces of vodka plus vermouth would be generous. I'm sure that some of our bartenders could clarify this further. I do think that the economics will work out just fine. Marcus, who do you think I'm getting this information from? The average restaurant Martini glass runs to something like six or seven ounces. That means four to five ounces of spirit plus maybe an ounce and a half of water from melting ice at 25% dilution -- and believe me, plenty of places go bigger than that. This is actually a terrible way to serve a cocktail (it becomes warm long before it can be finished), but customers would feel "cheated" if they were handed a three ounce Martini so restaurants have to serve double-size drinks. At Bemelmans, Audrey Saunders served Martinis in a small glass with half of the drink decanted into a little glass carafe sitting in a bowl of ice on the side so at least the drink would stay cold. There is just no way a restaurant can get away with serving a 3 ounce Martini. You would be shocked, I think, at the size of the Martinis most restaurants are serving. Fat Guy and I had dinner at Ben Benson's steakhouse one night and were served what must have been ten ounce Martinis. Steven's glass had something like 5 olives in it, which wouldn't leave much room for booze in a reasonably sized cocktail glass -- yet they hardly made an impact in the birdbaths they were using as glasses. This is also why I think a lot of chefs tend to be somewhat anti-cocktail. Cocktails have become so large that you really do tend to get a little drunk before your meal. Back in the day, a cocktail was served in somethig like a three ounce glass. A Martini would have been an ounce of gin, an ounce of vermouth and a dash of orange bitters -- a bracingly cold aperitif that stimulated the appetite, not a palate-deadening, mind-fogging, lukewarm alcohol bomb. I love to have a cocktail before dinner, but rarely order them at restaurants for this very reason. To further illustrate the point. . . at home I use mostly the Libby 8454 "Citation" cocktail glass. It holds four and a half ounces. It would be considered ridiculously small for a Martini glass in most restaurants. I scale my recipes for three ounces of ingredients, and by the time I finish shaking/stirring the drink it fills the glass. So when I say that "2.5 ounces of vodka plus vermouth" doesn't even come close to describing the standard restaurant Martini, I know whereof I speak (most restaurant Martinis don't include enough vermouth to even consider figuring that amount into the formula). 2.5 ounces of liquor would equal about a 3.25 ounce cocktail pour. No way would a restaurant sell that. I wish the standard restaurant Martini had only 2.5 ounces of -- well, gin rather than vodka. I'm sorry if I was unclear. "Liquor cost" means the same thing as "food cost." It's the cost of the ingredients to the bar, aka the liquor. Just like with restaurants and food, however, when you buy a drink at a bar you're not just paying for the ingredients in the glass. You're paying for the guy who mixed the drink, the guy who hauled the bottles up from storage, the cost of the glassware, the cost of the napkins, the cost of the ice machine that makes the ice, etc., etc., etc. All these things necessarily figure in to the overall cost of the drink to the bar, and all these things have to be considered when the bar is figuring out what they will charge for the drink. I have a friend who is getting ready to open a bar, and is spending an incredible amount of time pouring over spreadsheets to figure all these things out. I am given to understand that it's fairly standard for bars that are making money to run at around 25% liquor cost (which is a genteel way of saying "400% markup") on average -- some drinks will be well below this, and some will be well above. But this doesn't mean that the bar is making a 400% profit on average. the ancillary costs are higher than the ingredient costs. Exactly, Bux. The ancillary costs are always going to be there. While I think it's likely true that many restaurants make more profit on alcohol than they do on food, it's not so simple. Especially with wines, there is the question of when/how/at what price certain wines were acquired, how they are maintained, what you're paying your wine staff, what kind of glassware you use, etc. -- just as you say. This is why I think, as I have remarked above, that it's easier for a restaurant in the middle range to adjust the cost model than it is for higher end restaurants to do the same. The percentage profit is likely much higher on the food for the middle range place, and they have no where near the same kinds of ancillary costs associated with the wine program.

Andrew Feinberg, pizzaiolo, chef and co-owner of Franny's, is featured in the latest series of The Chef in the NY Times' Food Section. This should be an good series, and I'll be interested to see if they discuss any of his pizza making thoughts and techniques. Francine Stephens, his wife and partner, is also a talented mixologist in her own right, and it would be a lot of fun if they ran a little something about her creations. We'll have to wait and see. . . Today's article is actually about one of the chef's other talents: pasta. Specifically, Meyer lemon-ricotta ravioli. Earlier in the article, Francine remarks that they had originally offered pasta on the menu at Franny's but ended up taking it off because they decided it was too much pressure for the kitchen to do pasta to their standards in addition to the pizza once they started getting busy. Although it's a shame we have to miss out on their excellent pasta offerings, I wish more restauranteurs made decisions like this.