The new system of star ratings, and the 'safer food better business' is a bit of a joke. On a recent inspection we were told to 'go back to using the old systems' of logging everything from fridge temps to delivery temps to holding times etc. This is very time consuming for the busy chef (and the point that chefs at a decent level and standard have a brain in thier head and know how to cook and when an ingredient has passed its best seems to be overlooked by the , usually condesending EHO) and when you read SFBB you can just log a handful of these in order, presumably, to save time and paper work. When I was asked to prove that these procedures were in place I pionted out that SFBB only requires a few checks a day as oppesed to the old regime of a dozen or more. This, I was told was not acceptable and would probably be challenged in court soon (in a different case, not me, my kitchen is up to3* standard, 4 last year, but as soon as EHO arrived said 'oh you were awarded 4 * lastyear, i've never given 4!!!). What, then, was the point in spending presumably hundreds of thousands of pounds on developing and putting into practice SFBB if we are to be advised by health inspectors to revert to the old methods of logging??? It really does beggar belief that we pour so much money down the drain to jump through more hoops than a dolphin at sea world.