Jump to content

culinary bear

participating member
  • Posts

    857
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by culinary bear

  1. I'm not sure about the Waitrose pictures, however I have seen the cover with the child on the front and have to say I find it extremely middle-aged and uninspirational.  In fact I find the whole magazine quite dull.  My favourite food magazine in terms of photos and editorial content is GourmetTraveller, I wish that this country could produce something of a similar calibre.

    I've always found the more adventurous photographs in WFI to be well worth the cover price alone; I remember a piece from four or five years ago about Lapland where the photography was simply stunning.

    The better photographs in WFI remind me of Lepard's small 'reportage' snapshots in the chapter fronts in "Handmade Loaf", lovely pieces that don't look overworked, good honest pictures which steer very far away from the microwaved tampon school of food photography.

    Looking into my crystal ball (okay, whisky decanter top), there are going to be a lot more people posting, as Dan says, photos for immediate consumption. Given that good basic digital point-snd-shoots are now widespread, that camera phones are beginning to humble the old Kodak Easyshares of five years ago, and that goodish digital SLRs are no more than a week's income for most of us, are these pictures going to be better? Will the average chimp behind the lens (and I'm one of them, trust me) use this technology to improve the pictures we take?

  2. Whisky, unlike wine, does not develop further once removed from the cask and bottled. A 1967 whisky bottled in 1977 is going to be a very different whisky to a 1967 bottled in 1997, for example.

    While obviously not the world's oldest whisky - Wm Cadenheads on Edinburgh's Royal Mile have several 'old bottlings' from the 1920s - this may well be the 'most (cask) aged' whisky known to exist.

  3. Mr Bapi, I talk from REAL experiance but my partner would kill me so I cannot elaborate.

    We must agree to disagree at the moment

    I can certainly vouch for the fact that Bapi knows what he's talking about.

    Punjuna, It's a little unseemly to present an opinion, to present it again, and yet again, without any hint of evidence, reasoned argument or analysis.

    If you "cannot elaborate" as to the reasoning behind your opinon, then you'll find that people are far less interested in hearing it.

  4. I was in Liverpool yesterday.

    Was dragged kicking and screaming to Lark Lane, near Aigburth. It's a piece of the city that I think must have forgotten that it's in Liverpool.

    We went to Keith's Bar (clunky wooden tables, no pretensions whatsoever) and had a really good pork and chorizo stew with rice, and a tomato and lemon risotto, both at a fiver each. The kicker was the bottle of '97 Chateau Musar which only cost 14 quid!

    Note to add: I see in Jay Rayner's review of the Vineyard at Stockcross that they're charging £115 quid for a '97 Musar. Insanity.

    Thence on to the farmers' market down the road, to buy a trio of black puddings and a really good pork pie for later consumption.

  5. The North is thriving well, culinarily speaking, and has a goodly amount of good chefs doing good things (Messrs Pern, Flinn, Heathcote, Haworth, Laybourne, Rogan and Wilkinson, to name a few), but the incongruity of Liverpool's situation is striking :

    City of Liverpool population (2002) : 441,477 - the fifth largest city in the UK.

    In that area, there are four one-rosette restaurants :

    Ziba

    Simply Heathcotes (also holding a Michelin Bib Gourmand)

    The Radisson SAS Liverpool

    60 Hope Street

    ...and that's it. This in the city that in less than two years' time is going to become the European Capital of Culture.

    You have to go over the Mersey (Ferreee, cross da Merseee) to Oxton to get food anywhere near the standard you'd expect in a large and important city.

    I'd say the culinary scene is at least 10 years behind Manchester, Glasgow or Edinburgh.

  6. I've never eaten at Caesars, though every single time I've walked past it's never been less than half full (even at 3:30pm on a Monday). At a conservative estimate, it must seat well over 150 people. The menu reads like the bastard offspring of Bella Roma and Little Chef.

    The trouble with Liverpool is that the locals will quite happily blow upwards of 50 quid getting absolutely shitfaced of a Friday night, but won't spend half that on a decent meal. There's almost no culture of dining out. Come 2008 and the City of Culture there are going to be some very bemused tourists.

  7. Mattas International Food Market on Bold Street was a regular stop off when I lived on Merseyside - a fairly eclectic mix of foods from pretty much everywhere.

    You must, MUST, go to the Baltic Fleet pub in Wapping, just a midly inebriated stagger frm the Albert Dock. It's a brewpub of great character with an owner relatively new to the scene and a head brewer who has a phenomenal way with dry-hopping. I can't remember the name of the beer, but it's the dry-hopped version of their normal 'Wapping' session ale and it's the best IPA I've ever had in my life.

    The Ship and Mitre, near the entrance to the Wallasey Tunnel, has 15-20 hand pumps going at any one time. A proper old pub, full of character, and grizzled locals.

    A good place for lunch - on Renshaw Street (the road running parallel to Bold Street and ending at the bombed-out church) there's an Indian restaurant called Masterchef. Ignore the curries and the plastic desserts, go in and order a starter portion of the lamb chop tikka. Five charred and savoury chops for 4.50 and have the salty lassi to drink. On my first visit there they were still serving seven(!) chops as a starter portion before they realised no-one had any room left for anything else.

    The Philharmonic is a decentish pub, but I only mention it for the gents' loos and the fact that they have listed status. Trust me, you have to see them. The Phil is just opposite the Philharmonic Hall (funny, that) and as such is within spitting distance of the Carriage Works.

    Go to the Baltic Fleet. Seriously.

  8. What next? Employing people with parkinsonism to shake cocktails?

    It's a gimmick, but worse than that, it's a deeply patronising gimmick which will only serve to highlight the apartheid between able-bodied and disabled diners and worse, restaurant staff.

  9. I've worked with xanthan gum professionally. When I worked with Ian Morgan he was using it - laughingly referred to as 'Anthrax powder' - to stabilise foams so that they'd last longer on the plate.

    A litre of chicken froth-base needed 1-2 tsp of powdered xanthan gum in order to gain more stability, and gave a good lasting froth that didn't linger on the tongue longer than was needed.

    The xanthan powder was added directly to the warm froth mix with no slaking needed, just a 30-second blitzing with the stick blender.

    For the record, we got ours from MSK foods (hideously pricy for what it was, too).

×
×
  • Create New...