Jump to content

  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create a free account.

Edit History

liuzhou

liuzhou

13 minutes ago, gfweb said:

 

I don't appreciate being labelled a troll. I never said British food uses no spices nor did I say that spices were appropriated.

 

I did say that if one cited Indian cuisine as evidence, THAT would be cultural appropriation. So don't twist what I said.


 I didn't say YOU were a troll.

You did say or imply that Britain's use of Indian spices or Britain's adoption of Indian cuisine is "cultural appropriation". Or is only citing it "appropriation"?

I disagree. I repeat my question. By whom and from whom?

liuzhou

liuzhou

9 minutes ago, gfweb said:

 

I don't appreciate being labelled a troll. I never said British food uses no spices nor did I say that spices were appropriated.

 

I did say that if one cited Indian cuisine as evidence, THAT would be cultural appropriation. So don't twist what I said.


 I didn't say YOU were a troll.

You did say or imply that Britain's use of Indian spices or Britain's adoption of Indian cuisine is "cultural appropriateion". I disagree. I repeat my question. By whom and from whom?

liuzhou

liuzhou

5 minutes ago, gfweb said:

 

I don't appreciate being labelled a troll. I never said British food uses no spices nor did I say that spices were appropriated.

 

I did say that if one cited Indian cuisine as evidence, THAT would be cultural appropriation. So don't twist what I said.


 I didn't say YOU were a troll.

You did say or imply that Britain's use of Indian spices  or Britains is adoption of Indian cuisine is "cultural appropriateion". I disagree.  I repeat my question. By whom and from whom?

×
×
  • Create New...