Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create a free account.
We did an experiment in London where we played recordings of phoneticians saying 'herb' very carefully, some with the /h/ and some without. Many listeners reported hearing the /h/ in them all, although vocal tract x-rays and voice prints etc could prove there was no /h/ in half of them.
Some heard no /h/ in any.
We never told them what we were testing for.
People often 'hear' what they are expecting to hear.
We did an experiment in London where we played recordings of phoneticians saying 'herb' very carefully, some with the /h/ and some without. Many listeners reported hearing the /h/ in them all, although vocal tract x-rays and voice prints etc could prove there was no /h/.
Some heard no /h/.
We never told them what we were testing for.
People often 'hear' what they are expecting to hear.
We did an experiment in London where we played recordings of phoneticians saying 'herb' very carefully, some with the /h/ and some without. Many listeners reported hearing the /h/ in them all, although vocal ttract x-rays and voice prints etc could prove there was no /h/.
Some heard no /h/.
We never told them what we were testing for.
People often 'hear' what they are expecting to hear.
We did an experiment in London where we played recordings of phoneticians saying 'herb' very carefully, some with the /h/ and some without. Many listeners reported hearing the /h/ in them all, although spectographs and voice prints could prove there was no /h/. Some heard no /h/. We never told them what we were testing for.
People often 'hear' what they are expecting to hear.
By Marlene,
