I made the Burnt Sugar Cake Burnt Sugar Cake posted by snowangel as a practice for my daughter’s 12th birthday. The party is next week. We loved the cake—the flavor is absolutely delicious and I want to thank snowangel for posting this cake, which I had never heard of. My daughter read that her kids liked it so she voted for it as the first practice cake and it is a winner. I also made the frosting, which is a soft caramel and soooo good! I have some comments and a question at the end. I think that there are some mistakes with the recipe as written. I will admit that I read the beginning of the recipe several times before starting, but not the end… First, the ingredient list calls for 2/3 c white sugar, for the burnt sugar syrup, but in the instructions calls for 1/3 c. After trying 1/3, I figured it was 2/3c, because that made a thicker syrup. I used ¼ cup water for the 2/3 c sugar. The creaming of butter and sugar and then adding yolks and vanilla part is the usual butter cake beginning. When I added the cold water it became very curdly and I thought, this is the most unusual cake I’ve ever made. I added the 2 c flour and mixed that in. Then I came upon the oddest part, whipping the whites with ½ c flour and the baking powder. Also, the instructions don’t talk about the salt, so I added it to the batter bowl. Now back to the whites (I re-read and re-read—I wished I had read it before so I could ask on this board!) I decided to press on. Well, flour and whipped egg whites make..glue, which I threw out. I separated 3 extra whites and whipped them. I added the extra 1/2c flour and the baking powder to the batter and then folded in the whites. I baked my cake in a 9x13 inch pan for 35 minutes: toothpick clean and pulling a bit off the sides of the pan. The cake was not very high. The taste, like I said before, was fantastic. The mixing order and the water as a liquid still puzzled me. I searched my many cookbooks. Two had recipe's for Burnt Sugar Cake. The Pioneer Lady’s Country Kitchen, by Jane Watson Hopping (1988), which is of old fashioned recipes. It did have a Burnt Sugar cake, and cleared up the old-fashined method. This book's cake is almost identical to the one posted. (except for the vastly reduced amount of syrup-only 2 ts, 2 eggs instead of three, only 1 ts vanilla and, horrors, no salt). Here is the method in the book, after the water is added. Two cups of flour are mixed in first “with a few strokes” then the ½ cup flour with the baking soda (and the salt, I guess) are beat in with a few more strokes. Then the whites are folded in. In other words, my gut reaction was correct. But I still didn't understand why to mix the baking powder with only part of the flour. Joy of Cooking (Rombauer, 1975 edition) also has a Burnt Sugar Cake (and calls it a "taste sensation"). In this book they do a more traditional method of creaming butter and sugar and adding yolks and vanilla, then alternating the dry ingredients with water and finally folding in the whipped whites. The Fannie Farmer Cookbook (Cunningham, 1981 edition-a favorite cookbook) has a 2 velvet cakes which are very similar, that is a butter cake with water, but they both have 1/2 c cornstarch added to the flour. I'm making the cake again, but really want to try the 2-step method (as recommended in The Cake Bible (Berenbaum, 1988) and also in The Best Recipe (editors of Cook's Illustrated, 1999) of mixing the dry ingredients with the butter and a small amount of the liquid, then adding the rest of the liquids. My question is, I haven't seen a 2-step method cake with both yolks and whites. In The Best Recipe's recipe for white cake, they say just add the whites without whipping, and of course they explain why. My inclination is to treat the yolks like the fat they are and add the whites with the other liquids. Any helpful thoughts? Also, the Burnt Sugar Cake recipe as posted seems to need editing or clarification.