JAZ

But grinding meat and using a Jaccard don't yield similar results at all. Grinding or chopping gives you a lot of small, separate pieces of meat. Jaccarding gives you a single piece of meat with the fibers cut by the blades. From the initial post, I assumed Peter was talking about techniques that kept the piece of meat whole.

I've never tried the can, although I did have one of the "vertical roasters" at one point. As I recall, it did result in good skin. With the can, is the beer supposed to flavor the chicken, or is the point just to have the chicken sitting upright?

Hmm, that's a good question. I assumed that I would just strain the stock, then continue to boil it down until it had reduced. I'm not sure that's the best method, though. I used to make chicken stock with onions, carrot and celery, and cook it for 3-4 hours. A couple years ago, I started cooking it longer without any vegetables, which for my uses results in a better stock. I can always add vegetables later if I want their flavor; most importantly, I think it's the vegetables overcooking that makes chicken stock taste funky when cooked for a long time. In any case, I use 2 pounds bones/meat for each quart of stock, so reducing is easy math. I usually start with 4 pounds of chicken and simmer it overnight on low. In the morning, I strain and chill, then refrigerate so the fat congeals on the top. The next day, I remove the fat and bring the stock to a boil. Since I started with 4 pounds of chicken, I know that full strength, I want to end up with 2 quarts of stock. Reduced to 4x strength, that's 2 cups, or 16 fluid ounces. I just boil away until I'm getting close to that amount, then start measuring. If I go too long, I just add water back to the stock to equal 2 cups. Does that make sense?

There's pressure cooking, but I guess that's probably a variant of braising. It does, however, take less time.

This topic reminds me that I've been meaning to pull out my copy of Quick Pickles by Chris Schlesinger. When I first bought it a few years ago, I made pickles at least once a week, but haven't made any in ages. I recall a great recipe for beets and one for carrots that I liked.

The bags work fine, but also remember that you don't have to freeze it at full strength. I make stock, reduce it to a quarter of its original volume and freeze it in one-ounce portions (I have ice cube trays whose "cubes" each hold an ounce so it's easy for me). Then, each cube makes half a cup of stock when reconstituted, which for me is the most useful amount to thaw at a time. If I want a cup of stock it's two cubes, etc. Takes up a lot less room in the freezer.

A few thoughts: It seems to me that Grubstreet purposely picked vitriolic segments from the book. I guess they wanted to be edgy, but who knows if that's representative of the rest of the book? More importantly, if they wanted to be edgy, they failed, since they (perhaps unwittingly) picked subjects that are mostly old news and that didn't show any creativity or new thought on Bourdain's part. That's unfortunate. From those short segments, it seems clear that it's not his best work. I mean, even in Les Halles, he came up with "sorry-ass bivalve in an apron" and all he can say here is "douchebag" and "old fucks"? It's lazy writing from someone who -- at least at one point -- was capable of much better. I loved Kitchen Confidential and liked Cook's Tour too (although with a broader scope, it was more diffuse; but it still had moments of greatness). I've been disappointed with his writing on various blogs and in articles since then, because it all seems the same, and it's just not up to his previous level of writing. I hope the rest of the book will show that Bourdain is still capable of better, but fear it won't.

A different look at roasting chickens: All That Glitters.

Dan, I wish my bar had a sink, but it's just a small stand-alone. Not a very good picture, but it gives the idea. It's in my dining nook, which is next to the kitchen (more convenient than in my last place, where it was across the apartment). I store glasses in the freezer, and cocktail equipment in the cabinet next to it, so that's where I mix and pour drinks. I don't have room to store bottles anywhere near that area, hence the inefficiency of having to bring bottles from the bar into the kitchen. I keep thinking that it would make more sense to take the shaker and jigger over to the bar and pour there, then return to the kitchen to finish. I should try to develop that habit to see how it works. Mostly, I was just curious about the set-up other people have to actually make drinks.

Depends on the kind of lettuce you buy. Romaine, when treated right, can keep for a long time. "Baby lettuces," on the other hand, can seem to wilt and slime up before your eyes. In any case, the first thing you want is for the leaves to be as crisp as possible, so I soak them in cold water for 15 or 20 minutes. Unfortunately, the next thing you want to do is dry them completely. Easy enough with romaine, not so easy with crinkly leaves like Boston or red leaf lettuce. Once they're dry, put them in ziplock bags and squeeze as much air out as possible. As I said, romaine, if it's fresh when you buy it, will last for a month or more this way. Even butter, Boston or red leaf lettuce will last for a couple of weeks, if you can get all the moisture off the leaves.

John Kessler reported in his blog on big changes for Joe Truex and Mihoko Obunai-Truex -- yesterday's post revealed that Mihoko is taking over Repast as owner and chef, and today he reported that Joe has been named chef and partner at Watershed in Decatur. I'm interested to see what happens at both places. The one time I went to Watershed I found the food good enough but boring, the space loud and the service unprofessional, but with Joe heading the kitchen, I'll give it another chance. Since I live right up the street from Repast, I'm more interested in what will change there. I don't know how much of the previous menu was from Joe and how much from Mihoko, but Joe was definitely the FOH presence. I can't help thinking that his absence will make a big difference in the atmosphere there.

Maybe it's just here in the Atlanta area, but in the last few weeks the price of limes has skyrocketed. Granted, the price of both lemons and limes fluctuates throughout the year, but I can't remember the last time limes were so expensive. My supermarket now has limes at 3/$2.00. The big bag that used to sell for under $3 is $5.49 now. Is it like this all over? Is there a reason for the price hike that I haven't heard about?

A general question: how far is it from your liquor cabinet/shelves to where you make your cocktails -- and your ice source? And how do you handle that? Do you move the bottles you need for a drink over to where you make your drinks, or do you take the shaker and jigger over to the liquor and measure everything out there? I have enough room for all my liquor in my bar, and it's organized well enough for me to find things easily, but it's in the dining nook, and my bar tools and ice are in the kitchen. I end up carrying bottles to the kitchen and then not carrying them back. Then the counter next to the fridge, where I make my drinks, gets full of bottles. At which point I take them all back to the bar where they belong, and then start over. Are the rest of you just not as lazy as I am, or do you have a better system?

Just as a side note, my friend bought the product I got at a place that had a cask of it, so it was decanted into bottles when purchased. Thus, I have no official label, just a tag with the name and alcohol percentage (18%)on it. I'm interested to hear about the higher proof spirit.

It's actually "Both Indies" -- from Wondrich's Killer Cocktails: 2 oz. Inner Circle Green (the 115-proof) .75 oz lemon juice .5 oz. Velvet Falernum .25 oz. Grand Marnier Two drops Angostura bitters floated on top The problem, of course, is that Inner Circle isn't distributed anymore. Smith & Cross makes a decent substitute.

If you're looking for something accessible, I would recommend a book called Fresh and Fast by Marie Simmons. Marie was a recipe developer for Cooking Light and Bon Appetit for years, so her recipes are always written very clearly and work well. It's in print (paperback) and available from Amazon -- if you're interested in checking it out, Amazon lets you look inside.

I've never tasted Rinquinquin (actually had never heard of it until now), but it sounds as if it's something like a peach version of Lillet or Dubonnet. If that's the case, then no. If I had to liken the red peach liqueur to another beverage, I'd say it's something like Moscato (which to me always tastes of stone fruit).

I use them, cut into chunks on skewers, for satay or in a jerk-style marinade.

Last year we had a great dinner at Rioja, which I wrote about here. (There are other suggestions on that topic, although most are a few years old.) It sounds as if they still do the tasting menu; if so, I recommend it -- with the wine pairing.

Okay, I'll try to be more specific. I get a hit of sweetness first, but quickly followed by a sort of mustiness (aka dust balls) and something acrid (aka sweat socks). Yes, I know it's high proof, and yes, it's funky, but to me not in a good way. I like a lot of strong flavors and funkiness in other products (Islay Scotches or Maraschino for instance), so I'm not sure why this strikes me as off. Maybe I'm just not mixing it right.

At the risk of sounding like a wimp, I'm going to revise this statement. I've really been trying to like Smith & Cross, but I just don't. To me, it tastes like rum infused with dust balls and sweat socks. It's okay as a sub for the now unavailable Inner Circle in a Both Indies, but otherwise, I'm just not getting it.

A friend of mine who travels brought me back a bottle of this. I like it, but have found it to be of limited use in cocktails. Think of it as a peach-flavored dessert wine -- sweet, low alcohol (the bottle says 18%) and very fruity. The best use I found for it was in a Bellini-type champagne cocktail.

The main difference is the amount of evaporation -- there's virtually none in a pressure cooker. For me, the time savings is more than enough to make a pressure cooker a great tool to have. I suppose if one has unlimited time and doesn't care about fuel costs, there's no reason to use one.

A couple of thoughts: First, I find that most people who belittle "uni-taskers" do so out of a misguided feeling that it's somehow macho to cook with only a handful of tools -- they tend to say things like "All you need to cook is a chef's knife, a wooden spoon, a bowl and a pot." Then they immediately start adding things on (sort of like the Steve Martin character in The Jerk -- "all I need is this paddle game. . . and my thermos. And this chair, but that's all I need.") and pretty soon they have a a full kitchen outfitted. I don't know why, in cooking, so many people feel it's better to work without good tools -- would they try to play tennis with a ping-pong paddle? Second, as has been mentioned, the more focused one is in cooking, the more specialized tools one needs. (Chocolate dipping tools can only do one thing, but if you're dipping chocolates, it would be foolish not to have them.) From what I've seen, professional chefs and cooks have more uni-taskers than amateurs. For instance, when I worked at Sur La Table, we carried an egg topper that cost $50 or $60, and I always thought it was one of the most ridiculous things ever. Until a brunch chef from the Ritz Carlton came in and bought two. She regularly served 200 soft cooked eggs in a typical Sunday brunch and told me that the expensive egg topper was the only one she could count on. All the sudden it seemed like a very practical item -- maybe not for me, but certainly for her. Third, depending on how you define a "task," almost any kitchen tool can be described as a uni-tasker. As has been mentioned, knives do nothing but cut food, stoves do nothing but cook food. The list is endless, and includes all kinds of items that those Steve Martin types find indispensable when pressed -- scales, measuring cups and spoons, strainers, etc. The deciding factor in whether to buy a particular kitchen tool should not be how many tasks it can perform. We tell our beginning students to consider three things when deciding whether to buy a tool: how often you need to perform a task, how well the tool does the task, and how hard it is to do the task without the tool. Then you balance those considerations -- along with the cost -- and you have your answer about the usefulness of the tool.

I knew Del Taco pretty well when I lived in Southern California in the early 80's, then didn't see one for years after I moved. But my last few years working in downtown San Francisco, one opened up around the corner, so I went there once in a while. I found the crispy fish taco to be pretty good, but my favorite items were the Tacos Del Carbon -- both the steak and chicken versions were way above average for this kind of place. And I agree about the sauce.