I read a library copy of Cooking for Mr. Latte a month or so ago, before I'd found eGullet, and I wrote a bitter little note on it in my journal ["The precious, self-conscious Mr. Latte book astonishes me with its hoariness. Are there really women my own age living on the Upper East Side (West side?), dating, wearing barrettes, cooking meat with cream sauces, and shuffling home from frequent, early-ending dinner parties with their Tupperware tucked into those little old lady pushcarts? And if so, why would a semi-known writer ever date one of these women, when the ultra-competitive New York singles scene is filled with Aisha Tyler types who run around in bikinis watching football and ordering room-service beer at various W hotels?"] Today I've enjoyed reading several of the Mr. Latte threads on eGullet, and--for me--I wasn't so much bothered by Hesser's self-conscious winsomeness (which I read as tongue-in-cheek)...it was more that the book was such a throwback that it read as a sort of spoof of Fisher or other food writing of past generations. I can see why some readers found the book charming, but to me, it never quite rang true enough...even the moments of apparent personal revelation always seemed really retro...the Forsterish conflicts with older female relatives in Italy, the fragile mother-in-law bonding (reminiscent of Madeleine L'Engle's adult novels from the 50s and 60s), the stoic friendships and quiet, plodding coupling. It seemed so firmly set in yesteryear. I might've read it differently had I not known what era it was supposed to be set in...minus the airplane scenes or 9/11, I would've assumed someone of Shirley Hazzard's generation had written it...then again, I tend to think really great writing (even on a fun, frivolous theme) sells itself even if it challenges my suppositions.