Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create a free account.

Impressions, Marche aux Vins, Ampuis, 2004


LOS

Recommended Posts

I recently returned from the Marche aux Vins 2004 in Ampuis. Judging wine there can be difficult, as you only get a small pour in an INAO glass and have no chance to decant the wines. So I taste the wines multiple times, and try to get at least one pour from a nearly-empty bottle. Even then, the wine may simply be in an awkward phase. So take these notes for what they are worth.

2002 Condrieu -- severely lacking in acid; few impressive wines here. For the first time, I returned home with no Condrieu at all (excepting the Gaillard dessert wine).

2002 Hermitage -- there were only a couple of these at the Marche, but they pointed to a very weak year for Hermitage as well.

2002 Cote-Rotie -- A poor year, but not the total disaster that it seems to be in Condrieu and Hermitage. Even the best wines will be short-term drinkers and are likely be poor value in the US market. My favorites were Jasmin and Ogier.

2002 St Joseph -- in both red and white, these wines seemed to fare better than any of the other appellations. Still, not a great year.

2001 Cote-Rotie -- there were still quite a few of these at the Marche. They were surprisingly easy drinking, absent the mouth-puckering tannins that are often evident at this stage in evolution. Very nice depth to these wines.

2001 St Joseph -- the best vintage for red St Jo since I've been going. The Montez Cuvee du Papy is the best St Jo I've ever had. The Deboisseyt-Chol Rivoire was superb too.

2003 Cote Rotie -- many of these were nasty wines. They showed a huge amount of tannin, some more tannin, very little acid, and some decent fruit buried underneath all that tannin. Did I say they were tannic? But remember that these are very young wines, and they will continue to evolve in barrel. The best wines were from Gaillard, P et C Bonnefond, Jasmin, Ogier, Lafoy. I did not taste the wines from Jamet and some other notables.

Producer Notes

Duclaux -- a nice 2001, past wines have been hit or miss

Gilles Remillier -- absent this year. Too bad, as they have usually made nice wines

Champet -- also absent this year

Bonserine -- they seem to have tamed the oak a bit. The basic 2001 cuvee was nice enough, the 2001 La Garde had solid depth but was very tannic, the

other 2001 prestige cuvee was an oaky mess

Coursodon -- Nice white St Jo here

Jasmin -- bottles of 2001 Cote-Rotie were available in 500 mL here, a great wine in a nice weekday-dinner size.

Voge -- the 2001 Vielles Fontaines was not showing well, but I picked some up anyway on the advice of a local who had tasted it just before bottling. Bottled 2 weeks before the Marche.

Daubree -- a newcomer. Had a convincing 1999, and some nice 2001s.

--- Lee

Seattle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOS

It's good to read your impressions of 2002 in the north, thanks for posting them. With the floods in the southern Rhone I was pretty certain that the vintage there would be wrecked. But I also had a feeling that the north would be a similar story. reading between the lines of what en primeur offers I've had (not many!) I began to think I was right. Your post confirms it. With plenty on offer over the past few vintages; 2001 & 1998 in the south (2000 and 1999 also good) and 1999 in the north I think this is a vintage where I will make no purchases at all.

My expereinceof 2001 in the north is that this is a lesser, fruity vintage. One where you have to try before you buy I think.

BWs

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...