paul o' vendange

Edited to add: Whoops, misreading everything! Mon amie Bleu - I split all the fish heads I use, just to get more surface area exposed, but I don't use salmon. With salmon, I find that outside of the bones, everything so strongly flavored and oily in texture, I find it is disagreeable to use anything but the carcass bones. I'll share that I hate waste and am exceedingly tight about it - laughing to myself last night, making a lobster-Jerez beurre blanc (of sorts, adapted from Daniel Boulud), and some aromatics, as usual, crept up on the side of the sauce pan. I laughed because I noted how much time I always spend flicking each and every scrap of vegetable or herb back into the stock, no matter how tiny, for fear that whatever stock or sauce I make will lose the flavor of the wee tidbit. Truly demented, because I probably lose more in transfer than whatever is lost on the side of the pot. C'est la vie. Anyway, I have a good cleaver (F. Dick, 7.5#, I think it is), and pretty much bust up everything I make a stock out of. Doing that also allows me to get into the gooey/bloody areas, which contents I try to get rid of before making my stocks. C'est tous. Side: Great pics again, of your reblochon/magret! Paul

Make sure you remove the gills,they can impart a bitter taste.

I use heads all the time, unless I'm doing a salmon stock (I rarely do - but if I do, I only use salmon bones, no skin at all). I split the head lengthwise. As with my white chicken stock, I soak in ice water for 2 hours to float and congeal fat, blood, other impurities, then make sure as much blood/guts is removed from the head as possible before proceeding. I find that clarity is usually not an issue, if it is, I just slow the simmer way down and put the pan to one side, as with any stock. Or, build a raft/clarifier per Boris_A's suggestion. Too much good stuff in dat dere head to let it go to waste, IMHO. Paul

It depends on what I'm using them for. I boil many different kinds. I really do like Yukon golds, as they have a rich sweetnes, my guess is a higher component of converted starches than others, which I feel really lends itself to purees and the like. I use russets for the length and size in some things, i.e., potato wraps or crusts around meat or fish. Paul

Potato-crusted Loup de Mer, stuffed with ratatouille. With a red pepper coulis and braised/pan roasted fennel. Poached anjou pears with arugula and endive and gorgonzola-balsamic vinaigrette. Paul

Keeping with the nautical thing, are we o' scribe? Paul

Lisa, yesterday I picked up a copy of your tome - my father in law is an O'Brien nut, and loves food (and food history - last book I got him was the Food of France/Italy), so looking forward to both of us reading your oeuvre. Jealous of your locale! Used to live in Rhode Island (Massachusetts, Vermont, Connecticutt - life of an itinerant actor - former member of Shakespeare & Co., with you, a belated b.d. to Will), miss clamming the bay; would love to spend a week or 12 in the Long Island vineyards... Keep 'em coming! Paul

And a full quarter of the WWW just wept bitterly. Bonne fortune, Lucy. J'espere que nous pouvons faire un autre rendezvous un jour. Paul

Johnnyd, if you knew Jacqui, you'd know why. I did say salty. -P

Beautiful. The heart of it. Paul p.s.: I once worked for a place called La Poubelle. Owned by Jacqui, une femme vraiment provencale. Crusty, salty - we had an open line, in a rush she'd bellow to a server asking "when's it coming up" that "this is not F$cking MACdonalds! My food is gud, ee takes time! Not quite as genteel as your Pierre, but her food was wonderful, she served it simply with great goblets of Rhone and Provence wines. You've brought home why I love French cooking (and eating), the daily simplicity of enjoyment, honoring it. Merci encore!

Lucy, in between drafts of our operating agreement and inputting hundreds of "items" in my food costing software (anyone use iPro?), I have been amply, spiritually refreshed by your work. I said it before in so many words, let me say it now plainly: that was one of the finest web experiences I've ever had. Thank you for it. As I also said, were it not for the fact we are opening a restaurant imminently, I'd still be terrified to follow in your footsteps. My hats off to the next blogeur. Yours, Paul

I loved his book, but then I've followed him since I was but a kid with his publication of La Technique. Felt after reading the memoir he'd be a blast over a bottle of wine. Personally, I think he could care less about gaining anything from it. I just have the gut feeling he likes what he is doing and has made a good life from it, and probably felt it was about time to look back on his life in cooking. I'm really glad he did. (I get more of a sense of "profiteering" from a host of would be "masters" seen on any number of cable shows). I think we in America owe him a far bigger debt than he probably gets credit for. Because he has, along with Julia and others, brought French technique and cuisine to the masses, it is easy to forget his true import under the garish glare of celebrity chefdom and the phenom it has become. But were it not for Chef Pepin and his cohorts and colleagues, we'd might still be making velveeta surprise using canned spinach. Paul

At our restaurant, it will be the sous's job to devise something interesting, and nutritious, from various inventory. I feel it is vitally important to not feed crap to everyone (the worst I ever had was fouled fowl thighs, and although I begged off, a good many staff did not and got horrendously sick); additionally, I'd like it to be a learning opportunity to devise something worth eating from less-than-dear inventory (forgot the name of Keller's cook, was it "Eric's lasagna?"). We will also make several regular entree items, or specials, for our staff to try on a daily basis while we go over in detail how everything is made, what went into the thinking to come up with it, etc. 4:30-5:00 is a time to relax, bitch, whatever, 5:00-5:30 down to the business of the night. Paul

Sequim, if you are out of Seattle, you may want to consider Grimaud Farms, out of Stockton, California (a bit closer). They specialize in Muscovy (the parent Company, Groupe Grimaud, has been doing Muscovy in Europe, since 1965, from what they say); I get my moulard magret, as well as some drop-dead extraordinarily flavorful guinea hen from them. The mail order unit is Joie de Vivre, at Joie de Vivre. Just an option, I've no connection to them. The woman I dealt with on a wholesale basis was Cecile, very nice. Happy hunting! Paul

I should add, though, Chris, that the chemical property of C02 is one of its great benefits - supercritical C02 (past its "critical temperature/pressure point", no further pressure will being liquification; rather, the compound exhibits both gas and liquid properties) is used in making hop extracts - a fantastic solvent, supercritical C02 has negated the need for the solvents formerly used, primarily methylene chloride or hexane (talk about chemical soup). The initial phase in Miller's reduced isohumulone extract, discussed above. Paul

CDH - actually, CO2 is commonly liquid, under pressure. In fact, this is how dry ice is made - liquid co2 undergoes rapid pressure reduction (expansion chamber), causing some of the liquid to flash to vapor, the remainder to thereby flash-cool to solid state (at -109F) - dry ice. Paul

I used to judge home brew contest all the time. During a regional roundup in New Orleans (brewers from various groups in the gulf South) and one of the lads (John D. for those of you that know him) and some of his buddies made one of these things. Think about it. Something with animal fat in it that is going to sit around at room temp for a few days (okay-55F, but still pretty warm) and then be cooled and people are going to drink it. Not me buddy. I used to tell people to bring em on. I would drink weird beer and strong beer all day long, but nothing with animal fat. Sorry. Not a good plan. Sure beer is acidic, but why take the chance? YUCK. Brooks, I put "cock ale" right up there with "Babylonian Beer." A bubbling soup of musty barley-paste is not my idea of "I'll have another." Then again, I've never been a big fan of bloodletting to cure my headaches either.

Here in Chicago, we are actually blessed with great brewing water, at least for dark ales. 56 ppm Ca, 141 ppm bicarbonates, I seem to remember. Ok, I admit I may truly be off the deep end. But still puzzled by Miller's computer-response. Then it occurs to me. In the same paragraph, they say their beer is "essentially" natural; and their brews have no additives. OK, is is is? To wit: "Beer" is finished product; strictly speaking, a given "brew" comes from the kettle, and "brews" are the precursors to "beer." Therefore, is it me, or is Miller dissecting the English language such that they are indeed "brewing" naturally, but adding a host of crap downstream to their finished product? Come forth, O' Miller, and make testament! -P

I, too, wrote to Miller, with the following query: "Can you tell me, at any time during your brewing, cellaring or finishing process, do you use any chemical additives of any kind - i.e., added enzymes (i.e., maltase or other sugar enzymes; peptases, etc., anti-oxidants or other agents)? Thanks." And Miller, after careful consideration, wrote the following response: Thanks for contacting us. Our Beers are essentially a mixture of natural ingredients: Water, Malted Barley, Corn Syrup, Hops, and Yeast. Our brews contain no additives or preservatives of any kind. Beer is 94% water Malted Barley is the soul of beer Corn syrup gives beer a milder and lighter-bodied flavor Hops add spicy aroma and bitter flavors Yeast changes sugars into alcohol and carbon dioxide ***There are no sugars, such as table sugars, added to our products with the exception of our Flavored Malt Beverage's such as Skyy Blue, and Sharp's non-alcohol brew. A small amount of natural sugars are present in our products, but because they are in such small amounts, we do not test for them*** We appreciate your interest in our company. Cheers! --------------- I'm glad to know they've got the answer down. I am puzzled by "essentially a mixture of natural ingredients." If only essentially, among "Water, Malted Barley, Corn Syrup, Hops, and Yeast," what is left? Alright, enough perseveration. Back to a pint of ale.

Any Yoopers - how's the harvest?

Great news, Chris. Consolidation always helps out so much with maintaining quality. Watch the slide down, and cry in our beers. Crap.

Great, Robin, glad it worked out. Credit goes to James Peterson (and a host of others - I am about 80% thief, 20% improvisateur), not me. The only thing I would add, purely personal preference, but if I am using fat off a pan-sear/roast/saute, I only use the first few minutes worth of fat. After that, by my taste the fat is heated up quite a bit, changes chemical composition, and gains a bit of burnt flavor. It is for this reason, too, that I always pour off the fat, right from the start - reserving the first few minutes worth, sadly, tossing the rest. If I want fat in volume, I render off the skin (which I save, religiously) and trim from the carcass. Thanks for the Port sauce idea. I do a red wine reduction on that par (whole bottle down to a glaze), have never done that much port. Just about all the animals I cook and eat go, in toto, into the plate - a demi-glace fashioned from the duck bones, in this instance, and my cassis sauce is usually a "standard" ratio of 1/4 c or so of cassis, with the duck demi glace, reduced back to demi-glace consistency. But will do the full bottle-reduction on the port. Thanks. Paul

Found it: "A recipe from the 1500s: Take 10 gallons of ale and a large cock, the older the better; parboil the cock, flay him, and stamp him in a stone mortar until his bones are broken (you must gut him when you flaw him). Then, put the cock into two quarts of sack, and put to it five pounds of raisins of the sun-stoned; some blades of mace, and a few cloves. Put all these into a canvas bag, and a little before you find the ale has been working, put the bag and ale together in vessel. In a week or nine days bottle it up, fill the bottle just above the neck and give it the same time to ripen as other ale. Lest you think that was just an example of The Funny Stuff People Did A Long Time Ago, people actually still make this stuff. Boston Beer Co. recently whipped up some cock-ale from a recipe from Compleat Housewife (a British cookbook from 1736), out of 12 gallons of beer, "one large and elderly cockerel," raisins, mace and cloves. According to Koch, the founder of Boston Beer Co., the beer was a great success." Cheers.

Actually, Naguere, I believe the "cock ale" is an authentic 17th or 18th century recipe. Brings new meaning to "Beer is Good for You," get your restorative chicken soup with a pint. Paul

Mike, agree on all counts, and must admit I'm stumped as to the cache/appeal. A step up from "40's?" Paul