slkinsey
-
Posts
11,151 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Help Articles
Posts posted by slkinsey
-
-
Le Creuset. It's the stuff that is on their not non-stick black colored finishes for some frying pans, "woks", "tawas" grill pans and griddles.
Interesting. I see what you're talking about, but I don't seem to be able to find any literature about it. Fundamentally, I suppose, it is not all that different from regular enamel -- just maybe a little tougher.
Oh well... I knew I couldn't possibly cover every cookware design under the sun. I didn't cover soapstone griddles and stewpots either.
I was just eyeing the Staub at Sur la Table the other day. Very pretty.Cool stuff. What I like about it is the lid with nodules on the underside to serve as condensation points.
-
It's obvious what makes them similar: they are both protecting employees from the negative effects of certain things in the workplace that are not under the employees' direct control, that are reasonably avoidable and that are not fundamentally part the job they are performing.
and they're fundamentally different too. you can smoke outside, but you can't grab your waitress' ass outside. i'm pushing for that law to be repealed.
Damn it! That lousy government is stomping on my rights as an owner of private property to grab asses whenever and however I like!
-
However much I may agree with kinsey's position on second-hand smoke & employees (& I agree more than one may think), sexual harassment is not the same thing.
Please explain how, exactly, protecting employees from the negative health effects associated with passive inhalation of tobacco smoke is fundamentally different from protecting employees from the negative psychological effects associated with being groped?
Actually, the burden is on you. You're the one making the claim.
It's obvious what makes them similar: they are both protecting employees from the negative effects of certain things in the workplace that are not under the employees' direct control, that are reasonably avoidable and that are not fundamentally part the job they are performing.
For what it's worth, however, I didn't make the claim they were the same. I only made a meaningful comparison. You, on the other hand, did make the claim that they weren't the same.
-
However much I may agree with kinsey's position on second-hand smoke & employees (& I agree more than one may think), sexual harassment is not the same thing.
Please explain how, exactly, protecting employees from the negative health effects associated with passive inhalation of tobacco smoke is fundamentally different from protecting employees from the negative psychological effects associated with being groped?
-
Aren't Vilanelles shorter?
If you're going for brevity, then Haiku's the answer.
Food blog, 17 syllables per meal.
Too easy. As an eGullet literary maven, Maggie should be held to a higher standard.
-
OK, that does it. Maggie just volunteered to do the next foodblog in iambic pentameter. Or, if she prefers, in sonnet form.
Your choice.
Aren't Vilanelles shorter?
Hmm... I suppose it depends on whether you want to write in French or not...
Seriously, though, I think you should do a foodblog in iambic pentameter. It would be fun. Anyone who comments should also have to use a formal meter and rhyme scheme (no limericks allowed).
-
Sammy, if you take one thing away from this debate, understand this: this is not about customers, it is about employees. If it were about customers, you would be right. But it isn't. It's about employees and so you're wrong.
Understood but I believe we are being somewhat naive believing it is about the employees as opposed to a convenient way for the government to impose itself on our lives.
One could say the same thing about sexual harassment, no? That bad old government is imposing itself on our lives by telling us we can't fondle the breasts of female employees and co-workers.
-
Last week, I was at the bar at Capitale and the bartender had a large bandage on his hand. I asked him what happened and he said he cut it on a broken glass a few nights before. Should the government legislate that bars and restaurants can only serve in plastic cups to protect employees from the preventable health risks associated with the dangers of handling real glass? I'm sure society will ultimately accept drinking a nice martini in a plastic cup if it was helped along by legislation.
Again, that is a bogus comparison. It is entirely possible to wash glasses without cutting one's hands, and the handling of the glassware is entirely under the control of the employee doing the washing. It is not possible -- short of wearing a respirator -- to be in a smoky room without breathing in smoke, and the breathing of that smoke is not under the control of the employee in the smoky environment.
That said, if one was able to reasonably determine that certain kinds of glassware posed an unnecessary and preventable health risk to restaurant employees, then legislation regulating its use would not be inappropriate. I don't think there is too much danger of this happening.
-
What about black porcelain enamel finished cast iron pans? They develop a "seasoning" much faster then raw cast iron and are non-reactive. And they don't need the babying that the ivory enamel does, you can use them for high heat cooking.
I am not familiar with this. The kind of enamel I was talking about was the kind used by Le Creuset, et al. I've never heard of "black porcelain enamel." Who makes it?
Anyway... I am a little dubious at the idea of "seasoning" enameled cookware.
While on the subject of enameled heavy iron, however, I'd like to take the opportunity to shill for Staub, which I think makes very interesting cookware of this type. Other manufacturers of enameled cast iron, many excellent, are often lost in the shadows of Le Creuset.
-
And do we really want society's acceptance of things to be helped along by legislation? What if a current government doesn't believe it is right to eat hamburgers in restaurants? Is it okay once it becomes socially acceptable to no longer eat hamburgers? What about the arts? Should the government determine what is socially acceptable to see on Broadway or in museums or on film? Very dangerous.
This is the same bogus comparison others have been trying to make. It doesn't work. Your hamburger and your art and your film don't automatically affect other people. More to the point, they have no negative health consequences for the employees at the restaurant, museum, and cinema.
I still don't understand why owners of bars and/or restaurants can't choose on their own to allow or disallow smoking in their establishments.For the same reason owners of basr/and or restaurants can't choose to allow sexual harassment in their establishments.
The customers can then decide where they would like to go to spend their money.Sammy, if you take one thing away from this debate, understand this: this is not about customers, it is about employees. If it were about customers, you would be right. But it isn't. It's about employees and so you're wrong.
-
I have a feeling the smoking ban in restaurants was created, in part, to give restaurateurs the power to get these rude smokers to shape the hell up and show some damn respect.
The restaurateurs already had that power. They could have chosen to make their restaurants non-smoking.
Two things here:
1. Gallipygos is wrong. The smoking ban in restaurants and bars was enacted to protect restaurant employees from the preventable health risks associated with the inhalation of second hand smoke.
2. Once many restaurants were forced to put in nonsmoking sections, that is exactly what many restaurants did. However, put yourself in the position of the restaurant owners... A financial decision has to be made. If there is enough societal acceptance of smoke in the restaurant (or bar), then the proprietor would be crazy to turn away potential patrons who wish to smoke. However, as society's acceptance of smoke in these environments changes -- helped along by legislation -- so does the proprietor's decision. I have little doubt that a restaurant which allowed smoking all over the dining room today would lose business because most diners have decided that they won't tolerate a dining room where clouds of smoke come from the next table over. Compare this to office buildings. Not too long ago, it was commonplace for smokers to light up in office buildings with impunity. These days, such a situation is unacceptable to the majority of working people (again, largely due to a societal change helped along by legislation). A business which allowed smoking in its offices today would have a hard time attracting talented employees because, for many of them, working in a smoky office would be a "deal breaker" and they would simply seek employment with a company that did not permit smoking in the office. Where would we be on this without legislation on smoking in the office? Not here.
The stated purpose of the law was to protect employees. The irony is the law did nothing of the sort as many bar employees were either let go or make considerable less money in tips, so where is the protection?The stated purpose of the law was to protect employees from the preventable health risks associated with the inhalation of second hand smoke and it has been successful in this areas. As for "many bar employees were either let go or make considerable less money in tip" -- I'll be interested to see where this ends up in another several months. I'm sure there will be plenty of data available to evaluate the short-term and long-term impact of the smoking ban on bars and restaurants factoring out the effects of the recession. My casual observation -- which is backed up by what I hear from my friends in the business -- is that some establishments are clearly suffering, but that many/most are not doing appreciably less business than expected by now.
As a non-smoker who hates smoke, I feel it is simply not the role of government to be involved in whther or not smoking is permissable in a bar or restaurant.What's next?I know what you mean. As a non-sexual-harasser who hates sexual harassment, I feel it is simply not the role of government to be involved in whether or not ass-grabbing is permissable in a bar or restaurant. I mean really... the next thing you know we're all going to have bar codes tattooed on the backs of our necks.
-
OK, that does it. Maggie just volunteered to do the next foodblog in iambic pentameter. Or, if she prefers, in sonnet form.
Your choice.
-
Since Dean has been favoring us with so many interesting pictures of North Carolina, I thought I'd show everyone what else they have been missing by not being in North Carolina right now. These pictures were taken from the deck on my house in Western NC a few days ago:
Even though it's a hazy day, it's a pretty nice view, no? Wait? What's that lump on that tree? Let's have a closer look...
Um... is that what I think it is? Is that a baby bear right outside my back door?! I guess it must be, because his mother is in the garden.
D'oh! Mom is climbing up the deck to have a visit!
Time to go inside and radically rethink my position on gun control...
Bears, if you didn't already know, love good pork barbeque.
-
Might be interesting to hear from one of our more enigmatic members... or maybe someone from another part of the country... or maybe someone in the cooking biz.
Why not a citizen of the great nation separated from us by a common language? Balic? Majumdar? A Scottish Chef? LML?
And, while we're at it, I'd like to see the next foodblog all in iambic pentameter.
-
I've tried corn meal too. Same problem.
-
This may also have to do with the coating you are using. I used to think it was a cool idea to include pulverized corn flakes in my fried chicken coating for added crunch. But corn has too much sugar in it, and the exterior was always way too dark by the time the interior was cooked,
-
OK, Sob'
Sorry I haven't been keeping up. I've been quite busy with the eGCI coordionator gig and learning enough physics to write my (much longer than I thought it would be) eGCI unit on cookware. I'll finish up with Sunday, just because I thought the food was interesting.
Bergerka was kind enough to bring home some buckwheat flour, so brunch chez slkinsey was buckwheat pancakes with plenty of butter, Canadian maple syrup (with apologies to my New England upbringing), raspberry jam and peach preserves.
Dinner was pork scalopine with mushrooms (dredge pork in flour, brown pork on high heat and remove, dump in sliced crimini mushrooms, add several cubes of frozen chicken stock and the juice of one lemon when the mushrooms start to exude their liquid, pour off the liquid once the mushrooms have stopped shrinking, return pan to heat to brown mushrooms, mix some beurre manié with the mushroom liquid and return to pan, toss in some minced parsley and lemon zest, return pork to pan to warm through); salad of oak leaf lettuce from the Greenmarket; finished the bottle of riesling.
The ferrets had, I think, more ground up whole chicken and some chicken wings on the bone. Asher has taken to sneaking around and stealing his brothers' chicken wings when they are out for play time and bringing them to his "secret hiding place no one else knows about" under the bed.
Now... for the next "volunteer." Your suggestions sound interesting, although Bergerka is probably noa a good choice since we live together and tend to eat the same things. Might be interesting to hear from one of our more enigmatic members... or maybe someone from another part of the country... or maybe someone in the cooking biz.
-
Wow. You ate well yesterday. Could you please tell me more about the frites? Were the garlic and parsley (yum!) applied before frying, or presented as a garnish/condiment after frying?
As far as I can tell, it was just fresh frites with raw garlic and minced parsley sprinkled on top. They call it "papas alla provencal." Actually, I think it would work better if they softened the garlic in a little olive oil and then tossed the parsley, garlic (with oil) and frites together. The parsley and garlic would stick to the frites a little better that way.
-
If I can add a little hint of my own.. I always include parsley in my stocks. What I do is, when I buy parsley I pluck all the leaves off the stems, rinse them, spin them dry, lay them in more or less a single layer on a length of paper towel, roll up the paper towel, put the roll into a large ziplock bag and store in the refrigerator. I have been able to keep really good, fresh parsley from the Greenmarket in primo condition for up to three weeks this way. Getting back to stocks... I take the stems and thrown them in the 2 gallon ziplock bag I use to keep chicken bones in the freezer until I have accumulated enough to make stock. This way, I already have all the parsley stems I could possibly want when it comes time to make some chicken stock.
-
Perhaps a better headline linking to this article might be: breathing in the debris from several exploded and burned skyscrapers results in a 4% difference in the incidence of lower-than-expected birth weights.
-
He doth bestride the world like a bacon.
And my grandfather's favorite:
(ahem)
If you have tears, prepare to shed them now.
You all do know this bacon: I remember
The first time ever Caesar put it on his plate;
'Twas on a summer's evening, in his tent,
That day he visited the artisanal smokehouse:
Look, in this place ran Cassius' teeth through:
See what a bite the envious Casca took:
And here the well-beloved Brutus nibbled;
And as he pluck'd his cursed teeth away,
Mark how the bacon of Caesar follow'd it,
As rushing out of doors, to be resolved
If Brutus so unkindly snacked, or no;
For bacon, as you know, was Caesar's favorite.
-
In re to the defatting... I'd like to mention that there is no reason whatsoever not to take the skimmed fat, boil it with a little water to clean it up a bit, separate it from the dirty water using a defatting pitcher and store it in the freezer for future use. Those of us who have made it can tell you that nothing compares to matzo balls made with real chicken fat. The beef fat is probably less useful if tomato was used in the brown stock -- but duck stock, pork stock, turkey stock, etc. all yield very useful fats for cooking. It is also very nice to make the roux for starch-thickened sauces and gravies using the fat of the same animal with which the sauce will be served. Using turkey fat, deglazed turkey pan drippings and turkey stock gives a super-strong turkey flavor to your Thanksgiving gravy.
-
There are some consumer-level stockpots available that have spouts, but I don't recommend them. Too much can go wrong.
I don't know about that. I'd love to get my hands on one of these babies.
-
I make something fairly similar, although I also use a healthy dollop or Worcestershire sauce.
A handfull of crushed dry-roasted peanuts is good in this too.
Q&A -- Understanding Stovetop Cookware
in The eGullet Culinary Institute (eGCI)
Posted
Hmm... That's right about the annealing. It does make it softer. There must be something else that is done to blue/black steel -- perhaps whatever it is that gives it the black or blue color -- that makes it harder than mild low carbon steel. Because it is definitely the case, in my experience, that black/blue steel pans are harder than regular carbon steel pans.