we live in a market economy aswell where market forces determine price, which in practice seems to often go with democracy. I think that education is the right choice, as for school providing lunch, how many still do ? Many of you have kids or know people who do, how many of them recieve lunch from school rather than taking one with them. Also to what degree does the school provide the lunch, is it a cafeteria that makes it or breaks it on its on or is it a cafeteria where it is subsidised so as to provide an option to students, or is it free for all who want it? As for making this economical no problems with that but lets be honest it would not be local organic produce and regional cuisine. I can not see the majority of people expecting that the kids eat better at school than they do at home, especially when it costs them money be it out of pocket or taxes. I really can not see this being a real issue. By real i can not believe that this chef is taking upon herself becuase she sees this as a scourge destroying our youth. Beyond that we just got out of teachers strike do you think support for spending more on students food and not on teachers is wise? I am by no means some corporate loving peon, but i do see a need for priorities and when i think to myself in canada is lunch food an issue a resounding no flashes. The reason this was a success in the UK and may be in america is due to the large amount of students who recieve their meals from the school. It is also important to understand the history of the UK lunch system. It started out as cooked and prepared meals in the school by a chef, the reason that changed was becuase school boards and politicians saw places they could save money by employing mass production. These cuts were made and stood for decades. In america Jamie will have the most success in changing the food pyramid scheme and through that there will be a change in diet.