As an aside, the "conventional" view that the prohibition on eating pork is due to hygiene/health reasons just doesn't hold water. Consider: 1. The symptoms of trichinellosis (at least in the early stages) are the same for lots of other common diseases (colds, flu, etc). I find it hard to believe that ancient jews could easily distinguish one from the other. 2. There are a gazillion food-borne parasites that they would have had to deal with. Beef, chicken, goat, and even fruits and vegetables carry 'em. I doubt that pork would be singled out as a carrier of disease. 3. One has to explain what the health reasons for all the other prohibitions are. Why can one eat a duck but not a swan? Why only fish with scales? Why a goat but not a camel? 4. Like most parasites, they are easily killed by cooking meat thoroughly. All God would have needed to say is "Thou shalt cook thy meat until it is well done." 5. To me the most compelling argument is that while some may like to think that the ancient jews were particularly clever (or had divine assistance), so were the Egyptians, Hittites, Assyrians, Babylonians, etc. Don't you think they would notice some relationship with eating pork and getting sick? I think the laws of Kashrut are matters of ritual or ethnic purity, and have nothing to do with health. It is just an attempt by modern folks to find a rational or scientific explanation for something that is ultimately a spiritual matter.