I still have a question about the evaluation form. For example, when I was evaluating the Blue Smoke burger, I didn't find the meat very salty, so I rated it a 1 -- as in 1 is not salty, 5 is very salty. However, I don't particularly like overly salted meat, so if I were to evaluate this burger based on how I liked the degree of saltiness, I'd give it a 5. To the innocent bystander who is looking over our evaluations, what conclusion would they draw about the saltiness of this burger (and sloppiness and doneness and other subjective categories)? That it's very salty? That it's not salty at all? I don't really think they'd be able to tell, because I think we all had different ideas as to how to evaluate it. I think we should re-work the evaluation form a bit so we're consistent with our ratings. Perhaps something to this effect: 1.a. How salty is the meat? (1=not very salty, 5=very salty) 1 2 3 4 5 (this wouldn't count towards the point total - but would serve as a reference as to the relative saltiness of the meat as compared to other burgers we evaluate) 1.b. How do you like the saltiness of the meat? (1=didn't like, 5=liked a lot) 1 2 3 4 5 (this would count towards the point total)