Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create a free account.

Recommended Posts

Posted

3/29/03

TJ Rating 92+

I had this at the VC Rocks at Equinox event on 3/29/03. This was perhaps a step behind my WOTN, which turned out to be the 1994 Ridge Montebello.

This wine had a nice dark density to it. Not inky black or anything, but it seemed to have this density to it that was alluring. I got sense of leatheriness, some really nice allspice and nutmeg notes along with some decadent mustiness (no taint here). All of this was surrounded by really delicious fruit. Nice finish.

Posted (edited)

A question: I remember liking the 97 Tapestry as well; thinking that for a Californian wine it was damned potable. But your rating of 92: would that be relative to only other California red blends, or in comparison to red blends from both new and old worlds?

Edited by lissome (log)

Drinking when we are not thirsty and making love at all seasons: That is all there is to distinguish us from the other Animals.

-Beaumarchais

Posted

I actually enjoyed the 96 even more.

For my rating, it's compared to all others I have tasted, New and Old World. My experience tends to be much more heavily weighted to New World, if that gives you a reference point. I also have only been in to this wine thing for about 3-4 years, if that helps, too. I am a tougher grader than I used to be as well.

×
×
  • Create New...