1 hour ago, Dave the Cook said:The Washington Post has a good breakdown of what's in the suit filed by ATK: click.
I am not a lawyer, although I sometimes pretend on the internet.
I think challenging the look and feel is not going to be conclusive - except in conjunction with the other claims.
What seems more damning is that - while creating a competing entity - CK held an ownership interest in ATK. I wonder if - in his mind - this gave him the right to the product(s). That's exactly the opposite of fiduciary responsibility that a board member would normally have.
Still, in the interest of America, I think this thing must be fully litigated at Jack Bishop's tasting table. (Jack: Yes, you might think that Chris, but....)