I really didn't want to post again in this forum but after reading this, I felt compelled to. As per my first post, there is more than one side to every story. To wholeheartedly believe the "spin-doctored" version of what happened based on only one side of the story is somewhat foolish. I am not taking away from Rob's incredible talents and skills in the kitchen. He is a truly gifted chef in every respect of the word and I, personally, admire the man. But, that doesn't make him an excellent book-keeper or an expert at some of the other duties that regularly fall on an executive chef's shoulders. This combined with long absences from the kitchen of both restaurants would lead any business operator to do what happened here. He was not "screwed" by anyone and will probably walk away from it all with enough to start his own place in Vancouver or maybe in Toronto as the rumour mill goes. Rob admits that he could not afford to operate both places and his associates were the ones providing the cash. Therefore, they have final say. Where is the screwing here? If this was your business, would you let it be run financially into the ground or would you make an unpopular decision in order to save your hefty investment? Pretty simple math in my opinion. And I would have done the same. To hear the associates being called, "status climbers" and other assorted names is really childish and bitter about what comes down to a business decision. In closing, I wish Rob nothing but the best and I am sure he will learn from his mistakes and move on to bigger and better things. He certainly has gotten a lot of free press out of this and there ain't no such thing as bad press.