Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create a free account.

WTN Savennieres, "Coulee de Serrant, N. Joly, 1999


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello all.

The 86 had some CO2 and was a little sweet and you had the impression that it was vinified very reductively from not very ripe grapes which had seen quite a bit of botrytis.

I opened it on December 31, tasted to detect problems, than recorked and further decanted for half an hour after 24 hours. CO2 and sweet NO, botrytised YES it seemed, also a pungent acidity (no malolactic?) which settled back with decanting. Very fat mouthfeel however.

Both only had 11.5% alcohol.

No ABV stated on the main label, maybe in a rear lable that in my bottle had not, though.

Probably the most original wine I've ever tasted. :smile:

Cheers,

Alberto

Posted
I opened it on December 31, tasted to detect problems, than recorked and further decanted for half an hour after 24 hours. CO2 and sweet NO, botrytised YES it seemed, also a pungent acidity (no malolactic?) which settled back with decanting. Very fat mouthfeel however.

I'm confused

are you saying it was botrytised, but not sweet?

A meal without wine is... well, erm, what is that like?

Posted
I'm confused

are you saying it was botrytised, but not sweet?

Well Scott...the wine surely had some residual sugar, maybe around 2%, but its acidity was so high that it actually seemed drier. Or better, it wasn't a sweet wine but neither was dry. I've read that a degree of botrytis is an almost unavoidable happening in Loire Chenin Blanc; in this case I've found some honey and toast and a mixed dried fruit note (in both nose and palate) which can well be botrytis.

Again, the overall impression wasn't sweet. It has been my first taste of this wine so I can't say nothing in comparison with other vintages. :smile:

Cheers,

Alberto

Posted
I opened it on December 31, tasted to detect problems, than recorked and further decanted for half an hour after 24 hours. CO2 and sweet NO, botrytised YES it seemed, also a pungent acidity (no malolactic?) which settled back with decanting. Very fat mouthfeel however.

I'm confused

are you saying it was botrytised, but not sweet?

Scott,

I remember tasting 1994 Corton-Charlemagne Coche-Dury and 1994 Montrachet Domaine de la Romanee Conti. Both wines included botrytis in the aroma profile, the result of late picking I presume. Neither was sweet.

Mark

Posted

Once more, back to the 1986 coulee:

Just went through my notes and realized that I also had it on one other occasion the year before (way to many wines that night). It showed completely different, rather dissapointing, and I only noted "kerosine, oxidation, old yeast". Strangely, that wine came in an antique bottle like the ones that coulee was bottled into in the sixties (like a Baileys bottle, for lack of better comparison). The wines were so different I never made the connection before...

Posted
Strangely, that wine came in an antique bottle like the ones that coulee was bottled into in the sixties (like a Baileys bottle, for lack of better comparison). The wines were so different I never made the connection before...

Yes, that was the shape of the bottle I had. Similar to those of Ruinart or Lauent Perrier rose Champagne. An extremely deep pupitre too.

Alberto

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...