Sorry, I just noticed this thread and my comments on the restaurant are probably outdated within the context of the current conversation. Nevertheless..... towards the end of 2002, I played out a stage from my culinary school at Chez L'epicier. Having barely any experience with French cuisine or much fine dining in general, it was a bit difficult to relate to all the food heading out of the kitchen. One might consider that odd coming from an individual studying cooking, however, my concentration for some reason has always evolved out of far east and south asian cuisine. I only spent a few weeks in the restaurant but it was quite an interesting time. People seem to have opposing ideas of what a Chef like Laurent probably does within the kitchen. throughout all of December, he was always there once a day. Most of the time he'd be in and out, talking to some of the other kitchen staff and organizing certain deliveries for the sous-chef. Very often (perhaps even twice a week) he was involved with bringing in some new dishware purchases; some of the most interesting designs I've ever seen. During the odd lunch or dinner service (especially on a weekend) he'd be there doing the cooking next to the regulars. I am not trying to 'expose' anything here. This all just served to constantly amaze me. Whatever creations in flavours or plate presentation he had already designed appeared to be well-imprinted in each of the kitchen staffs' memories. These people were machines; in the good sense of the word. In fact, for the first week it was actually very difficult for me to determine the amount of patrons from the kitchen's view. Granted I was not doing to much beyond prep in that short time, but I honestly had the impression that maybe five to ten people had shown up throughout the lunch service. In reality the restaurant was fairly busy, yet this kitchen seemed far off from the vision that I had in my mind. Not loud, not claustrophobic, barely even hot. Things just worked, and it looked like it didn't take much to do that either. Anyhow, with regards to my constant amazement with the plates going out of the kitchen, nearly everything impressed me. The far greater majority of them only being appealing by eye; obviously tasting was not an option for each item. What I was never able to understand was the simplicity of each recipe lending itself to create a full $50+ meal. I can comprehend the cost of the ingredients, and the often lovely or at least very interesting presentation, but it never felt like that much special preparations or odd seasonings had gone into the creation of each dish. As I mentioned before, I do not have much experience with French cuisine, but I would love for someone to explain a few of these ideas to me. Just in case this tiny inversed review comes across as a little convoluted with my main thoughts even more incomprehensible, here's a summary of my current opinion: 1. The food is always put together in a clean and efficient fashion 2. The food always leaves looking consistent - usually quite unbelievable in plate design too 3. Dishes and especially appetizers are incredibly innovative, exhibiting a flair for Asian influences 4. The kitchen staff are amazing and the ideal supporters to a great chef 5. The apparent simplicity for food preparation shocked me. The variety of spices and general flavouring ingredients beyond garlic, salt and pepper appeared extremely limited and barely noticeable during the cooking process. This is getting too long and I can't think what else I had originally wanted to say. Overall, I was very impressed with what I saw. However, I simply do not understand it enough. That hopefully makes sense. Maybe I didn't get to see the right things while I was there. Maybe I am looking for the wrong elements altogether. Joel