Thank you all for the nearly overwhelming amount of advice. It seems about a third of post follows my line of thinking (e.g. EnriqueB's point on eliminating uncertainty), a third imply that I am a dreamer (not entirely untrue) and another third is about the best knives (point well taken). The interesting question and comparison came from Norm Matthews on cooking paralleling photography. It is a good one, because I am an amateur photographer as well. Also, starting from zero. I had an entry-level (still expensive) DSLR with a 18-200 lense. To me, that combination is equivalent to Thermomix - it allowed me to take good picture in a green (point-and-shoot) mode and then, setting by setting, learn more complex scenario (Aperture-priority, Shutter-priority, hopefully manual mode in the future). Once I was comfortable doing that, I knew what I wanted and started to understand the limitations of universal tools (e.g. too high maximum aperture at the 200 zoom range) and could evaluate whether I want to spend my money on better single-purpose tools (e.g. prime lenses, flashes, filters, etc). So, I am looking for a DSLR in the kitchen. As I already said, I feel that ThermoMix is one part of that equation. I do not need to be convinced towards/away from it. And I did not mean to imply I was looking for single universal gadget. I was more looking for the other items/techniques/approaches complimenting ThermoMix and with the same philosophy. I am happy to spend good time in the kitchen eventually. I just want to start from getting fast healthy results ("good pictures") early on to minimize "cook, taste, throw away, order takeout, get frustrated" cycle, typical of unsupervised beginner cooks. And yes, I'll probably take some beginner cooking classes/knife skills as well. Finally, I just wanted to really thank the community again. This was my first post and the firestorm of advice, counter-advice and (mostly) gentle humor is trully appreciated. Hopefully, once I start my journey, I'll have something productive to contribute back as well.