Just a note of warning, I am a beginner, so forgive me my transgressions. I also tried the 2000 vintage. Colour: (something I've always had a hard time describing, why isn't there a standard spectrum so everyone is on the same page, it's much more objective than smell and taste so it seems to me that there should be one), anyways pretty typical merlot, a medium intensity garnet red Nose: Plum and cherry with some oaky background notes. Mouth: More cherry flavours. Smooth and a little buttery; well balanced with enough acidity to give it some substance. Finish: Nice dark chocolate, sour plum finish that lasts for awhile. My overall impression was that this is a good wine for the money, nothing too surprising, very good merlot. But as with many people, Miles included, I have to say that I do not find merlot particularly interesting or challenging. Though I seem to remember having one or quite interesting merlots from Washington, the Kestrel Columbia Valley Merlot comes to mind, though I can't remember what vintage, generally I avoid it. So I suppose I am somewhat biased in saying that I would probably not buy it again, even though I thought it was good. Just a note to clarify: I'm pretty sure Wine Spectator gave it an 88 and the 2001 vintage a 90. I forgot to add: I bought this at a private wine store here in BC (was more convenient than going to Government liquor store) and it was $26.99CDN! A little steep if most of you are getting it below $10US. Cheers, James