There's a thread in the NY forum about "fine dining" and were it starts to separate itself from ordinary dining and whether there's a different standard in NYC than there might be in other cities. I suppose "cheap" is also relative to a few things such as where you are and what you get for the price. Dinner may be dinner, but not all meals are equal. It's also not reasonable to translate the price into dollars and think in terms of what that will buy at home. Most meals in Europe will cost about one and a half what they cost last year because the dollar is so weak. Europe itself is not cheap for traveling Americans, at at least what was cheap last year, is not cheap this year in dollars, although the price to the locals hasn't increased that much. Anyway, fresco's meal was six courses and beverages. One can't expect that to come at the same price as a simplier meal. Bux: What you said is true, for the most part. You can't compare Apples and Oranges... But for $68 ($34 for two persons) my wife and I can dine on around 10 dishes, in an upscale Chinese restaurant, in San Francisco's ChinaTown. This meal could consist of a whole Roast Duck, Mu-Shu Pork, a whole Steamed Fish, Dungeness Crab with Black Bean Sauce, a couple of stirred-Fried veggie dishes, a whole chicken, some appetizers, a huge bowl of rice and tea. More food than we could consume at one sitting and something we'd NEVER do. We'll still go to Portugal and dine at expensive restaurant but also balance it with lesser cost fare. This we've done, where ever we travel, which we've been doing since 1959... I understand a lot of American tourists are bypassing Western Europe and heading to Eastern European countries, where prices aren't as costly.... yet :)