Not really the point. Or not my point, at any rate: the issue is the entirely exceptional nature of the product anytime LaBan comes within worshiping distance of Bryan Sikora; and (most importantly) the fact that his bias is never, ever, even hinted at in the reviews. I considered the issue of his ability to get in multiple reviews. It just so happens that I know of three parties in the last month that had dinners there who have, in the past, served as LaBan Beards. None of them were at full twelve-seat capacity, and none of them would have strongly demurred had he sought to be included. His "inability" has, at a minimum, been little contested. To be entirely clear: I have no quarrel whatever with his opinion of Talula's Table - I haven't eaten there. I do, however, have issue with the fact that he failed to disclose his relationship with Sikora and Olexy, and - most importantly - found a way to give this non-review an amount of space that dwarfs any restaurant he's written up before. As far as I'm aware, anyway. Well, that and the fact that he, having previously warped the Bell-continuum to accommodate a BYOB, has now gone a large step beyond and found a way to elevate a country store to Double-Secret Non-Probationary Honorary Stealth-Four-Bell status. Which rankles, given the standards he's held others to. Well, that and the fact that his opinion of Django always seemed a bit overheated to me, and his review of Sovana seemed like nothing much beyond a way to give a friend a leg up. ← What is Laban's "relationship" with Sikora and Olexy that he did not disclose? Do we know this for a fact or is it merely a suspicion?