Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create a free account.

On Food... vs. Larousse Gastronomique


Recommended Posts

Is one generally preferable to the other? It seems like having both Larousse Gastronomique and On Food & Cooking seems a little redundant, although I'm sure people bought both just to have them.

If anyone has a better option, please let me know.

Thanks in advance.

I think you need to look inside both books before you decide. To me they are like apples and oranges - very, very different. I certainly refer to On Food very frequently, Larousse - hardly ever.

Anna Nielsen aka "Anna N"

...I just let people know about something I made for supper that they might enjoy, too. That's all it is. (Nigel Slater)

"Cooking is about doing the best with what you have . . . and succeeding." John Thorne

Our 2012 (Kerry Beal and me) Blog

My 2004 eG Blog

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I too do not see this as an either/or situation, but if I had to choose one, it would be On Food and Cooking.

John Sconzo, M.D. aka "docsconz"

"Remember that a very good sardine is always preferable to a not that good lobster."

- Ferran Adria on eGullet 12/16/2004.

Docsconz - Musings on Food and Life

Slow Food Saratoga Region - Co-Founder

Twitter - @docsconz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No contest, you want On Food and Cooking.

I'm probably in the thousandth of a percent of the population with the most use for Larousse, yet like Anna I hardly ever use it. As a practical reference work, it's pretty much a failure. If there's a competitor for the Larousse position on the shelf, it's the Oxford Companion, but that's also not a particularly good practical reference -- though it's more enjoyable to read than Larousse.

On Food and Cooking, which is a kitchen science book, is not really in the same category as Larousse and Oxford. It is, however, indispensable.

Steven A. Shaw aka "Fat Guy"
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have both Larousse and the revised edition of The Oxford Companion to Food (to which I am a contributor) on a shelf next to my computer and I refer to them both in the course of my work occasionaly. I don't use them much, but there have been a number of times when I've been very grateful to have them around, which is how it should be with works of reference I think.

There's a table of contents and excerpts from On Food and Cooking at Harold McGee's Curious Cook website which might help you make up your mind: click here.

By the way Fat Guy, do you have the 2001 revision of Larousse? I think I know where your coming from but I think "pretty much a failure" is a tad on the strong side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have several editions of larousse and like the one from the '50s the best. that said, i rarely use it anymore--even though at one time i probably would have considered it indispensible. i think mostly it's a change in the kind of things i'm researching. only a couple of times a year am i looking for the "authentic" french version of something. I'm much more likely to be interested in how something works ... and that's in "on food."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have OFAC but I do have Larousse and use it occasionally. I like it for getting information on things I don't know much about, and I like the fact that most of the things in the encyclopedia come with a recipe of some sort. I've used it mostly to get ideas of flavorings, herbs, etc. to add to ingredients or dishes as opposed to using the recipes verbatem, but then that's how I use a lot of cook books. Don't use any as much as I used to since I got in the habit of going on line for ideas. I like the Larousse paella recipe that uses a good bit of squid, yum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I couldn't give you an answer until I knew more about your cooking style and the things you get from your cookbooks (after all, if all you REALLY want to do is fill 3 inches of shelf space, either one will do -- they're both "nice to have" in a library).

You say you get most of your recipes online ... so when do you turn to your culinary library? What kinds of questions, issues are you usually looking to solve? Is it historical (go for Larousse) or chemical/scientific (OFAC, hands down). Are you looking for something that's a good read (IMHO, OFAC over Larousse, then)? Or do you want to explore an area that's completely new to you (might then want to consider others, eg, H This' Molecular Gastronomy) ... You'll have to help us help you in this one :cool:

I have OFAC and This -- they apply to all cooking styles and cultures ... I don't have Larousse (French focused, Euro-centric) ... but I have Bruce Cost's Asian Ingredients, as well as his book on Big Bowl Noodles, a combination which is the Asian equivalent of Larousse. Fits my needs perfectly ... may not be your cup of tea ...

Regards and good luck choosing!!

Edited by JasonZ (log)

JasonZ

Philadelphia, PA, USA and Sandwich, Kent, UK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i don't think i said i get most of my recipes online. i usually either wing it for most of the nightly meals, and refer to my cookbooks for family g2g's, special events like parties, etc. i tend to like cookbooks that do more than just list recipe after recipe. the more information, the better. i like to learn where a recipe came from, how it developed, why it tastes like it does/how it comes together, and why certain dishes or food staples took off in a certain region. to me, that's just as interesting as how it tastes. among my friends, i tend to be the guy filled with seemingly useless information. it's probably not surprising that i got a general desk reference book from one person for xmas and a food lover's companion from another.

as for these books, i was just looking for something that could meet those needs.

like i said earlier, i had alotted one book out of my viking store gift card xmas moolah. maybe i'll just get both and hold off on something else. it turned out i got a few more shun knives, so that probably freed up some space on the ol' gift card.

i may look into those asian books you suggested. i'd love to know more about that part of the world.

thanks a bunch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:biggrin: I literally start to fall asleep when I read the science of cooking. I've had the McGee books and the Wolke books which are similar. My eyes start feeling heavy lidded and I feel like running away from home or falling asleep forever, having to read the "whys" of what I know how to do from experience, which is how to cook.

A person can learn to cook from experience and from a visceral see and feel of the thing. The explanations of "why" are great if you love that stuff, or if you *want* a reason of why things happen so you can explain it to other people or just "know", yourself. . . I never wanted a reason - I wanted to *do* and to eat. I prefer a bit of mystery, magic, as to why this or that happens. The mind is free to wander into mythology then. Perhaps an egg white whips up because it has the soul of an old gleeful dragon within it. . .that sort of thing. So much more fulfilling than chemistry (to me) in the long run.

I read the 1971 edition of Larousse from cover to cover when I first wanted to learn about food. Now *that's* fun reading. :laugh: Really. It's a liturgy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...