Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create a free account.

Is beer more complex than wine?


jm chen

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, Hector Litre said:

 

Says who?  You DO realize Belgian Ales have all sorts of ingredients in them, right?

 

Me 😊

 

Followed by: Don‘t feed the trolls ...

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/26/2019 at 2:44 AM, Hector Litre said:

 

Believe me, I've read way more than you have.  Way more.  There is no such thing as "ambient yeasts".  They are wild strains.  And I know which ones do what to wine. 

 

Funny, I've almost completed the Diploma of wine, which is the level below a Master of Wine so I'd sincerely doubt your first statement. 

 

Quote from the Oxford Companion to Wine: Ambient yeast, are those that are present in the vineyard and winery, as opposed to inoculated, cultured yeast.

 

I'm leaving this discussion now as rational discussion from a position of knowledge does not seem to be happening.

  • Like 5

Nick Reynolds, aka "nickrey"

"The Internet is full of false information." Plato
My eG Foodblog

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, nickrey said:

Funny, I've almost completed the Diploma of wine, which is the level below a Master of Wine so I'd sincerely doubt your first statement. 

 

Quote from the Oxford Companion to Wine: Ambient yeast, are those that are present in the vineyard and winery, as opposed to inoculated, cultured yeast.

 

I'm leaving this discussion now as rational discussion from a position of knowledge does not seem to be happening.

 

How much beer do you have in your wine program?  Second, yeast is microbiology, not a food person's tool.  Fermentation done this way was natural well before people started making wine.  

 

I guess nobody's up for a proper discussion, other than negation.  I was hoping this forum would have people that don't get ticked at reality.  

 

Hector Litre (hL)

sourcer.ca

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, liuzhou said:

 

I don't even know what that is meant to mean. It's nonsensical.

 

It makes perfect sense.  Yeast doesn't exist for fermentation.  Yeast is a group of organisms.  The wine world simply cannot rename parts of microbiology because it's convenient to wine.  But then again, it's completely expected from the wine community.  

 

Edited:  Maybe it's still unclear.  Fungi behave the way they do well before any fermentation for ethanol for humans.  Terminology goes way beyond any food application, beer, wine, cheese, distilled spirits.  

Edited by Hector Litre (log)
  • Sad 1

 

Hector Litre (hL)

sourcer.ca

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, liuzhou said:

Yeast doesn't exist for fermentation the same way food doesn't exist for eating.

 

You mean the goal of all those wild ducks is not ending up as my dinner? That's depressing.

 

 

 

Teo

 

  • Like 3
  • Haha 2

Teo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/22/2006 at 1:24 PM, cdh said:

This sounds like an objective statement that can be proven or disproven quantitatively. A little gas chromatography should reveal how many different flavorful compounds are in a sample of either drink... do enough samples and you should be able to get an idea of whether the statement is true or not.

 

FFS.  I said it 13 years ago, and I'll quote myself to buttress the point.  Complexity can be measured objectively.  Do the tests.  Tell us where more different compounds are identified, the wine samples or the beer samples. There, you have your answer.  All this facile "there more stuff you can put in beer, so it is more complex" vs. "nature does more stuff to the grapes so it's more complex" vs. yeast technicalities blather is getting us no place.  

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Christopher D. Holst aka "cdh"

Learn to brew beer with my eGCI course

Chris Holst, Attorney-at-Lunch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...
On 10/28/2019 at 1:50 PM, cdh said:

 

FFS.  I said it 13 years ago, and I'll quote myself to buttress the point.  Complexity can be measured objectively.  Do the tests.  Tell us where more different compounds are identified, the wine samples or the beer samples. There, you have your answer.  All this facile "there more stuff you can put in beer, so it is more complex" vs. "nature does more stuff to the grapes so it's more complex" vs. yeast technicalities blather is getting us no place.  

 

I'll risk jumping into an arguably pointless discussion, because it might be more entertaining that working on the deadline looming over my head.

 

I think you could objectively test a particular wine against a particular beer for complexity. But how would you test Wine (capital W— meaning the world of wine, against Beer, capital B—meaning the world of beer)? Like most such comparisons, it would likely devolve into a taxonomic one ("that's not really a beer!" "Yes it is!" Which has already started happening upthread).

 

In this case I think we'll find that the definitions of complexity reside in the assumptions and biases rooted in the minds of whoever's doing the comparison. To me this kind of discussion = Not Interesting.

 

We can safely say that the worlds of wine and beer are each massively complex. More than any one person can wrap their head around. For some people, this complexity may increase their enjoyment—but it's already of such a high order that a little more or a little less complexity in either world will make no practical difference. What's the difference between there 100 flavor compounds that you'll never be able to identify, and there being 1000? What's the difference between there being 100 styles of beer you'll never have time to try, and there being 500?

 

There are much more interesting pissing contests to bet on. 

Edited by paulraphael (log)

Notes from the underbelly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, paulraphael said:

There are much more interesting pissing contests to bet on. 

 

I dare to say that beer is the best fuel for a pissing contest.

 

 

 

Teo

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 3

Teo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, teonzo said:

 

I dare to say that beer is the best fuel for a pissing contest.

 

 

 

Teo

 


I trust you never had a night of whiskey highballs ... kidney-friendliest drink there is !

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Duvel said:

I trust you never had a night of whiskey highballs ... kidney-friendliest drink there is !

 

I confess my total ignorance. This will be corrected soon. I'll add some elderflower cordial, just to be sure.

 

 

 

Teo

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Teo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So. It's time to move on to an actual pissing contest.

 

We must include the Tequila Anaconda. Mentioned in what may the best opening line ever, in Joni Mitchell's "Talk to Me":

 

There was a moon and a street lamp

I didn't know I drank such a lot

'Til I pissed a tequila anaconda

The full length of the parking lot

 

Trouble is, whenever I look up the drink by name, I just get google links back to the song lyrics. 

Notes from the underbelly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

This is a tough question. Technically, yes. it uses 4 primary ingredients (grain, hops, yeast, water). Which is more than the 3 primary ingredients in wine.

 

That being said "complexity" is more than just the amount of ingredients. Wine tends to vary in taste greatly from region to region just by suble differences in the primary ingredients and bottling/brewing process.

 

Ultimately it just depends who you ask.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...