• Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create an account.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Sandra Levine

Recipe modifications

2 posts in this topic

"There isn’t one recipe, with the exception of a Julia Child recipe, that we haven’t modified in some way for our readers, no matter how slight."

Could you elaborate on the specific ways you may modify a recipe for your readers?  I am particularly interested in adaptations of dishes made and served in restaurants.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The first way we modify is to fit our "style." That is, we don't number steps, we write in complete sentences, we don't abbreviate (we spell out tablespoons, cups, etc.). We introduce an action with an action, i.e. "Using a wooden spoon or a standing mixer with the paddle attachment, stir...." with the hope that we are thinking as the recipe maker is thinking: "Oh, let me get out the spoon or the mixer before I begin this process."

Renee Schettler, assistant editor, is a genius at fitting many kinds of recipes to our editorial "style."

Then comes Bad Recipes: recipes that list ingredients then omit them from the instructions: Hmmmmmmm: wonder what I'm supposed to do with this 3 tablespoons of minced jalapenos?

Or minimalist recipes: "enclose ingredients in rice paper." Hmmmm.... would that be DRY rice paper. moistened, covered with a damp towel...."

Or insider recipes. "Make a bearnaise sauce." Okay!

About restaurant recipes: we often get requests from readers for us to obtain a special recipe from a restaurant or chef. This, believe me, is not as easy as it sounds. First, there's the chef and his creativity and ingenuity, which is not easily codified. Then there's the fact that restaurants make food in larger quantities than does the home cook. Or, at least, restaurants are used to portioning off either their work or their ingredients into a sort of Serves 4 category. By noon they've made a vat of delicious chicken stock, they've trimmed 15 celery roots, etc.

Also, chefs often think of recipes in proportions: one part butter, to three parts flour to two parts milk.  Okay, let's break that down.

But of all the reasons that recipes get killed, never see the light of day, the most common is: they don't taste that great. And they're not worth all that work and expense.

There's this whole new genre of cookbooks coming out of Australia that LOOK GREAT. Big color pictures of almost every dish. Very simple instructions across from the pictures.... except, you have to be Dionne Warwick to figure out what it is exactly that they want you to do!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.