Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create a free account.

culinary bear

Confit Duck

Recommended Posts

If it solidifies at room temperature and is perfectly clean, I don't see why you couldn't add it to your stash of fat.

You do need quite a bit to make confit unless you are planning to follow nathanm's method above.


“C’est dans les vieux pots, qu’on fait la bonne soupe!”, or ‘it is in old pots that good soup is made’.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Replying to several posts...

==============

The water temperature in the water bath is the external temperature - the heat soaks into the food and ultimately it all comes into equilibrium at the same temperature. However, that takes a while, depending on the thickness, and on the temperature conductivity of the food. A piece of styrofoam would take longer for the center to come into equilibrium than a block of copper, because copper is an excellent conductor of heat, and styrofoam is a very poor conductor (i.e. a good insulator). Meat is somewhere in between in conductivity.

You can do the same thing in an oven - I use a water bath because most ovens are not accurate at low temperatures.

A slow cooker filled with water would be another sort of water bath. Slow cookers are not that accurate either, and generally don't have much temperature control. The manufacturers are scared about somebody getting sick from slow-cooked food at too low a temperature and suing them, so they generally make the lowest tempertaure like 200F. This would work for confit, but you generally get better texture at a somewhat lower temperature. The higher you go the more the risk is of overdoing it, and being left with mush. The time would be less than at 180F.

Some cooking is aimed at bringing the food to an internal temperature and then you stop as soon as it does - say, in cooking a steak. Confit, and most forms of braising, are about bringing it to a temperature, then letting it sit there for a period of time to allow a chemical conversion to take place - like collagen denaturing into gelatin, fat melting etc. Those changes are what makes confit what it is in terms of texture and taste. The rate of the changes depends a bit on temperature - you can speed it up or slow it down a bit. However the unique aspcets of confit depend on long slow cooking.

So, the long time cooking time is partly because it takes a while for the heat to soak in - but that is probably not more than an hour or two of the cooking time. The rest is letting the meat sit at temperature to change.

In my experiment last night I did boneless pork butt confit, and lamb shank confit. I tried it at both 9 hours and 12 hours at 180F. The 9 hour version was fine, the 12 hour was a bit more tender. Either one would be acceptible. Depending on the meat, and the thickness, you might be able to cut it down lower than 9 hours, or even less if move the temperature up a bit. However, ultimately you risk moving into somethnig that is not confit like.

Duck legs are significantly thinner than a lamb shank (say have to a third less) that should cut an hour or so off the time right there.

Note that none of these parameters are super critical - the difference between one extra or one less hour is only a 10% effect. As long as your temperature does not way out of whack it is hard to over or under cook this unless you are off by many hours.

==========

Flavor would presumably develop during aging the same way in a vacuum bag as the traditional way. Part of the point of preserving meat this way is that the layer of fat sealed out oxygen - that is also what the vacuum bag accomplishes.

===========

I store the food as I cook it - i.e. if it is on the bone when I cook it, I leave it on the bone for storage.


Nathan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for a great explanation.

If one doesn't have one of those seal a meal pouches, one could cook the duck in the fat and keep it at 190 by removing the cover when the temperature stabilizes which takes about 2 hours. Then there is another 2 to 2 1/2 hours to cook the duck legs. Fiinally letting the duck to cool in the fat for another hour gets you to a 5 hour cooking session.

Though I've always been happy with my confit prepared in a slow cooker, I can't wait to try your method.


“C’est dans les vieux pots, qu’on fait la bonne soupe!”, or ‘it is in old pots that good soup is made’.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If it solidifies at room temperature and is perfectly clean, I don't see why you couldn't add it to your stash of fat.

You do need quite a bit to make confit unless you are planning to follow nathanm's method above.

My goodness... I just got my query answered by Paula Wolfert. I'm truly honored.

yup, me too. great start to a great year, i hope!

i have some somewhat elderly confit in the back of the outside fridge (vintage 8/04?) and it is covered with a nice thick fat layer, so with what came from roasting this duck, rendering fat, and skimming from the stock, there's plenty for a new batch. off to the duck market on monday for a new batch of confit.

made a pleasant duck ragu with some of the roast duck meat, to serve over spinach pasta made with the new kitchenaid pasta roller from santa. mmmm, duck ragu. happy new year!


"Laughter is brightest where food is best."

www.chezcherie.com

Author of The I Love Trader Joe's Cookbook ,The I Love Trader Joe's Party Cookbook and The I Love Trader Joe's Around the World Cookbook

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are we done thanking the french for all there contributions,remember

BETH V-Bechamel,Espagnole-(Which nobody does)Tomato,Hollaindaise,Veloute---My girl----Beth V--Careme-Escoffier

for the times they are a changing-Foam This!!!

Dave s


"Food is our common ground,a universal experience"

James Beard

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We'll always owe the french one, culinarily speaking...


Allan Brown

"If you're a chef on a salary, there's usually a very good reason. Never, ever, work out your hourly rate."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
nice thick fat layer, so with what came from roasting this duck, rendering fat, and skimming from the stock, there's plenty for a new batch. off to the duck market on monday for a new batch of confit.

not so fast-----fat that comes from roasting is a no-no for making confit. It is damaged (overheated) fat. Please dump it


“C’est dans les vieux pots, qu’on fait la bonne soupe!”, or ‘it is in old pots that good soup is made’.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
not so fast-----fat that comes from roasting is a no-no for making confit.  It is damaged (overheated) fat.  Please dump it

hmmmm... i was trying out a method (barbara kafka's?) where the duck is first poached in stock (that's why there was a considerable fat layer to salvage), then roasted in a hot oven for a brief period (about 30 min)---do you think that fat is still overheated? it is very creamy pale yellow. not browned. thanks for your experienced response!


"Laughter is brightest where food is best."

www.chezcherie.com

Author of The I Love Trader Joe's Cookbook ,The I Love Trader Joe's Party Cookbook and The I Love Trader Joe's Around the World Cookbook

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nathan,

You mention that you haven't done the duck confit sous vide yourself, but you've had it prepared by others. Do you know what temperatures/times were used? And how much fat was used?

I've tried it myself with mixed results. I seasoned the duck leg/thigh quarters (from Long Island duckling which is all I could get locally), sealed them in the vacuum bags along with roughly 1.5 T of duck fat, and let them sit in the fridge for a day. I heated them in a water bath at 68°C (154°F) for about six hours. Then I got impatient and cranked the temperature up to 77°C (171°F) and cooked for an additional 2 hours, chilled them in ice bath, and refrigerated.

The results were flavorful and reasonably tender, but definitely not "confit". One mistake I made was in trying to combine the marination and cooking stages rather than following the traditional procedure of marinating in the dry rub, rinsing/drying, and then cooking. I thought that the flavors from the (light) seasoning would absorb during the rest period and slow cooking. Next time I'll do the traditional treatment using Paula's salt-to-meat ratio.

It's also clear that I need to start out at a higher temperature and/or use a considerably longer cooking time. Even the higher temp I ended up at is lower than what you specified for the pork and lamb. I'll try 10 - 12 hours next time. I'm inclined to stick with the lower temperature and extend the cooking time.

If you make duck confit, please report your results here or in your sous vide thread. Thanks for the info.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
not so fast-----fat that comes from roasting is a no-no for making confit.  It is damaged (overheated) fat.  Please dump it

hmmmm... i was trying out a method (barbara kafka's?) where the duck is first poached in stock (that's why there was a considerable fat layer to salvage), then roasted in a hot oven for a brief period (about 30 min)---do you think that fat is still overheated? it is very creamy pale yellow. not browned. thanks for your experienced response!

I wouldn't advise it.

I guess you could do a taste test with a teaspoon of each: fry a small piece of bread in fat from normal rendering and another from the roasting fat and note the difference.


“C’est dans les vieux pots, qu’on fait la bonne soupe!”, or ‘it is in old pots that good soup is made’.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wouldn't advise it.

I guess you could do a taste test with a teaspoon of each: fry a small piece of bread in fat from normal rendering and another from the roasting fat and note the difference.

mmmm, fried bread taste test....i can do that. and look, it's breakfast time! good suggestion--thanks!


"Laughter is brightest where food is best."

www.chezcherie.com

Author of The I Love Trader Joe's Cookbook ,The I Love Trader Joe's Party Cookbook and The I Love Trader Joe's Around the World Cookbook

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wouldn't advise it.

I guess you could do a taste test with a teaspoon of each: fry a small piece of bread in fat from normal rendering and another from the roasting fat and note the difference.

potato scones fried in duck fat.

*mouthgasms*

excuse me while I remove the drool from the keyboard.


Allan Brown

"If you're a chef on a salary, there's usually a very good reason. Never, ever, work out your hourly rate."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nathan,

It's also clear that I need to start out at a higher temperature and/or use a considerably longer cooking time.

I'm just going to jump in here about starting off at a hgh temperature. I am eager to read Nathan reply to all the rest.

I had learned that it is best to start the duck and the fat at room temperature and let it slowly heat together to the temperature desired, poach it at that temperature for a few hours or until a straw easily slips into the flesh, and finally to let the duck cool down in the fat. This has worked for me for more than 20 years.

I never felt the need to shift gears but Nathan's comments about using so much less fat means more people might jump in and try their hand at making confit. Is there a downside to home cooks doing this? I wonder about leaving the duck in the bag afterwards for further aging..


Edited by Wolfert (log)

“C’est dans les vieux pots, qu’on fait la bonne soupe!”, or ‘it is in old pots that good soup is made’.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm just going to jump in here about starting off at a hgh temperature. I am eager to read Nathan reply to all the rest.

I had learned that it is best to start the duck and the fat at room temperature and let it slowly heat together to the temperature desired, poach it at that temperature for a few hours or until a straw easily slips into the flesh, and finally to let the duck cool down in the fat. This has worked for me for more than 20 years.

I never felt the need to shift gears but Nathan's comments about using so much less fat means more people might jump in and try their hand at making confit. Is there a downside to home cooks doing this? I wonder about leaving the duck in the bag afterwards for further aging..

The gradual increase in temperature sounds like the right approach to me. One of the advantages of sous vide cooking, as Nathan pointed out, is the ability to "dial in" a precise temperature if you're using a steam oven or water bath. I'm still not sure what temperature I should be aiming for - more experimentation needed.

One thing I didn't mention about my previous attempt was the amount of juices that accumulated in the bag during cooking. I don't know if that has any effect on the heat transfer (compared to duck fat alone), or how it might affect the storage properties. I was hoping to keep the duck sealed in the bag until use. Perhaps a more traditional dry cure will reduce the moisture in the duck before cooking. The duck needs to be fairly well dried before using a Foodsaver-style vacuum machine, and the fat should be well chilled so that it doesn't mess up the seal. A chamber machine won't have that problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of my experience with making confit of pork (shoulder, butt, belly) and lamb (shanks). In general I cook these at between 170F (77C) and 180F (82C) for between 8 - 12 hours. The results are very much like duck confit.

This temperature, along with ample fat (rendered lard, duck fat, olive oil) gives you a texture that is very similar to duck confit. I have been served sous vide duck confit in restaurants and I believe that the numbers would be similar.

At lower temperatures, or for shorter times, it does not turn out like confit at all. So, I think that this was part of your problem.

Recall that the original recipe posted in this thread by Culinary Bear was 90C for 12 to 14 hours. Sous vide does not speed up the cooking, so I would expect the times to be similar.

As a base line for duck confit I would suggest 180F (82C) and letting it go for at least 8 hours. Package the legs invidually, 1 to a vacuum bag - that way you can sample them at invtervals. You might want to try more like 2 -3 tablespoons fat per leg.

Take one out at 8 hours, and then periodically up to 12 hours. If that does not work, then try longer time periods - up to 14 or even a bit more. It is possible that you would need to go higher temp - to 200F (90C) - but I doubt that. My experiments with pork suggest that you are better off at 80C to 82C.

In general, sous vide lets you cook at a lower temperature for longer - for example many people braise short for as long as 36 hours sous vide, but at lower temperatures than normal braising (60C to 66 C - 140F to 150F).

The marination should proceed conventionally. There is no reason to suppose that sous vide cooking would change the marination process for confit. That may be part of the issue with your approach. So, if I am brining pork, I do it conventionally, then cook it sous vide. The same should be true for duck confit - follow the conventional recipe up to the point of cooking, then seal the legs in the bags with fat..

There are vacuum systems for doing marination, using vacuum marinators and tumblers - I have one of those too, but it is VERY different than sous vide.

It does not matter all that much whether you increase the temperature gradually or not. In fact, I would recommend not. As it stands, sous vide is pretty gentle cooking. Just use a water bath at 180F (82C) for the whole time.

What you are trying to do with confit is raise the temperature of the meat to the desired level, then let it sit there for an extented period of time while some parts of the meat break down - collagen to gelatin, fat rendering etc. The quicker the interior reaches the critical temperature, the more time that it will spend doing the conversion process.

In normal cooking you are using a flame or other heat source that is WAY hotter than you want the meat to be, so you have to be careful and time it carefully. Here you are using a medium (water in a water bath, or steam in a steam oven) that is the same temperature as you want the meat to be.


Nathan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for taking the time to explain confit in sous vide.

I've done fish that way based on an ersatz method of sous vide packing. (If you have my book on the cooking of southwest france, see pages 349 and 149.)

I became so entranced with this method that I had a correspondence with a French Canadian scientist\cook named Pierre de Serres. He taught me that when the temperature of the water and the fish are the same, the fish can stay in the package in the water all day without breaking down or deteriorating. In fact, it is just as good 30 minutes after it is placed in the waterbath or as long as 10 hours. This was back in the 80's when Georges Pralus was inspiring a lot of people to work with sous vide.


Edited by Wolfert (log)

“C’est dans les vieux pots, qu’on fait la bonne soupe!”, or ‘it is in old pots that good soup is made’.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't need to thank me - its my pleasure to contribute...

As you say, the ability to cook precisely in temperature without being precise about timing and without fear of overcooking is one of the attractions of sous vide. It is great alternative for things that otherwise have to be cooked to the second.

Most high heat things I now cook slowly via sous vide, then quickly sear the surface at even higher heat than I would normally use. Fois gras, for example, is excellent this way - particularly if you want to cook a whole fois gras. You can make the inside perfect, then sear the outside... Cooking only by searing in a pan requires much more precise timing. Fish, shrimp and lobster are all great this way - you can avoid overcooking without worrying about timing.

The other class of items that are good done sous vide are preparations like confit, or braised dishes, that even in conventional cooking have long slow cook times.

With confit in particular, it lets you use a much smaller amount of fat and makes clean up easy.

As soon as I can pick up some ducks I'll give it a shot and verify the times and temperatures...


Nathan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is very exciting. I await your experiments.

FYI, I once watched Michel Bras poach a 3-pound calf's liver ( in one piece) wrapped sous vide very slowly in barely heatded water. His intention being to cook it without allowing it to toughen. The resulting texture was silky texture. As you say the result of precision cooking. After being cooked to medium-rare, the liver was chilled, sliced very thin, and served with a sharp radish vinaigrette.


“C’est dans les vieux pots, qu’on fait la bonne soupe!”, or ‘it is in old pots that good soup is made’.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stupid Question Alert!

Please forgive me for asking this, but I'm wondering, do you need to be a fan of dark meat to like Duck Confit? I generally prefer breast meat, so am wondering how the confit method affects the flavor? In other words, is there I chance I might like it, even if I'm not normally a fan of leg/dark meat? Could the breast meat be prepared this way, and would it make sense to do so?

:shock: Thanks!

Pam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Stupid Question Alert!

Please forgive me for asking this, but I'm wondering, do you need to be a fan of dark meat to like Duck Confit?  I generally prefer breast meat, so am wondering how the confit method affects the flavor? In other words,  is there I chance I might like it, even if I'm not normally a fan of leg/dark meat? Could the breast meat be prepared this way, and would it make sense to do so?

:shock: Thanks!

Pam

Breast is usually served Rare and sliced. Legs are tougher and need that time to get tender. That said, I consider all of duck to be dark meat. :biggrin:


Bruce Frigard

Quality control Taster, Château D'Eau Winery

"Free time is the engine of ingenuity, creativity and innovation"

111,111,111 x 111,111,111 = 12,345,678,987,654,321

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...

As a base line for duck confit I would suggest 180F (82C) and letting it go for at least 8 hours.  Package the legs invidually, 1 to a vacuum bag - that way you can sample them at invtervals.  You might want to try more like 2 -3 tablespoons fat per leg.

Take one out at 8 hours, and then periodically up to 12 hours.  If that does not work, then try longer time periods - up to  14 or even a bit more.  It is possible that you would need to go higher temp - to 200F (90C) - but I doubt that.  My experiments with pork suggest that you are better off at  80C to 82C.

...

It does not matter all that much whether you increase the temperature gradually or not.  In fact, I would recommend not.  As it stands, sous vide is pretty gentle cooking.  Just use a water bath at 180F (82C) for the whole time.

...

Thanks for the temperture/time guidance. I like the idea of packaging the legs individually and pulling them at intervals to determine the best time.

The main reason I thought that a gradual increase in temperature might be benificial is that it would give the meat enzymes more time to tenderize before being deativated by heat. (See page 144 of the new edition of McGee). I'm not certain that my assumption is correct, or that the enzyme action would even be desirable. Just another variable in the mix.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have 2 dozen duck legs vacuum packed with duck fat in a water bath at 180' right now. I'm taking them for dinner one night for a group on a ski trip in Utah next week. I've done alot of confit the usual way, this is the first time with this method. I've been curious about it since I read the sous vide thread and decided it was time. I did a couple singles so I can pull them out at intervals to check the progress..............more later!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have 2 dozen duck legs vacuum packed with duck fat in a water bath at 180' right now.  I'm taking them for dinner one night for a group on a ski trip in Utah next week. I've done alot of confit the usual way, this is the first time with this method. I've been curious about it since I read the sous vide thread and decided it was time. I did a couple singles so I can pull them out at intervals to check the progress..............more later!

Please do report back! I am very interested in this technique, as I'm not too sure if I have a good source for duck fat where I live (although I do live next to an ethnic market that sells stuff like 2 pound packages of duck hearts, so maybe they would have some if I asked) and this technique looks like it would require much less fat to achieve an acceptable result. I'd really like to make my own confit for cassoulet.


Don Moore

Nashville, TN

Peace on Earth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have 2 dozen duck legs vacuum packed with duck fat in a water bath at 180' right now.  I'm taking them for dinner one night for a group on a ski trip in Utah next week. I've done alot of confit the usual way, this is the first time with this method. I've been curious about it since I read the sous vide thread and decided it was time. I did a couple singles so I can pull them out at intervals to check the progress..............more later!

Does anyone have experience cooking sous vide at high altitudes? I'm curious how the lowered boiling points of everything would affect the temperatures you'd need to hold.

MelissaH


MelissaH

Oswego, NY

Chemist, writer, hired gun

Say this five times fast: "A big blue bucket of blue blueberries."

foodblog1 | kitchen reno | foodblog2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone have experience cooking sous vide at high altitudes? I'm curious how the lowered boiling points of everything would affect the temperatures you'd need to hold.

MelissaH

Temperature is temperature regardless of altitude. It is only when you get into "boiling" things or baking things that need to rise when the lower atmospheric pressure kicks in.


Linda LaRose aka "fifi"

"Having spent most of my life searching for truth in the excitement of science, I am now in search of the perfectly seared foie gras without any sweet glop." Linda LaRose

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • By CarsonWyler
      I'm looking for guanciale, preferably in the Sonoma County area but am willing to travel a bit or order online if necessary. Any ideas?
    • By Glen
      Looking to learn and ask questions about home curing meats.  I have an 11 lb batch of genoa salami going and it is my first batch.  Worried about the PH level not dropping as needed.  Need some advice.   I followed the Marianski recipe exactly.  I have a pH meter and the starting point was 6.15pH which I thought was unusually high.  2.5 months in, I am about 73% of starting weight yet my pH is only 5.88pH.  My curing chamber is consistently at 57deg. F. /80% humidity.  My pH tester seems calibrated properly using the calibration solutions.  I am using the meat probe adapter and just sticking it in the salami until the tip is submerged etc...Thanks in advance for any suggestions or reassurances. 
       
      Glen

    • By liuzhou
      It is possibly not well-known that China has some wonderful hams, up there with the best that Spain can offer. This lack of wide -knowledge, at least in the USA, is mainly down to regulations forbidding their importation. However, for travellers to China and those in  places with less restrictive policies, here are some of the best.
       
      This article from the WSJ is a good introduction to one of the best - Xuanwei Ham 宣威火腿  (xuān wēi huǒ tuǐ) from Yunnan province.
      This Ingredient Makes Everything Better
      I can usually obtain Xuanwei ham here around the Chinese New Year/Spring Festival, but I also have a good friend who lives in Yunnan who sends me regular supplies. The article compares it very favourably with jamon iberico, a sentiment with which I heartily agree.



      Xuanwei Ham
       

      Xuanwei Ham
       
      more coming soon.
       
       
    • By Daily Gullet Staff
      by Chris Amirault

      Anyone who wants to write about food would do well to stay away from similes and metaphors, because if you're not careful, expressions like 'light as a feather' make their way into your sentences and then where are you?

      - Nora Ephron

      I attended a training last fall at which we were asked to share an object representing something important about mentoring, our focus for the week. I suspect that few in the workshop had difficulty coming up with their tape measures, baby photos, and flower pots, but I usually find this sort of assignment challenging, preferring simple denotations to forced connotations.

      On the drive home, I rolled down the windows, sensing that the air was turning slightly crisp and cool. I savored that harbinger of autumn in New England, when my thoughts turn to braises, stews and charcuterie. After a summer of keeping the oven off in my non-air-conditioned kitchen, I dreamed of daubes, considered new curries, and generally jonesed for the promise of meat to come.

      And then I realized that I had a perfect metaphor for mentoring: my 5 lb. vertical sausage stuffer from Grizzly Industrial, Inc. The next day, I lugged the apparatus to the training, hiding it behind a door for fear of ridicule. When my turn arrived, I hauled it out and clunked it down dramatically on the center table. "Good mentoring is like a sausage stuffer," I said, "for at least ten reasons:

      + + +

      That's the article as I started writing it. But over time, Nora's words came to haunt me. The whole shtick began to smell a bit fishy, and I began to fear that, like many tropes, this metaphor turned attention away from a trickier, worrisome truth hiding in plain view.

      But unlike many tropes, the worrisome truth I was hiding is in the object, and not the subject, of the metaphor. That is, the metaphor wasn't really about my relationship to mentoring. It was really about my relationship to sausage.

      Imagine the scene: I whip out my sausage maker and give ten reasons why my metaphor is bigger and better than everyone else's. (I did mention that I was the only man among three dozen women in that training, didn't I?) Laugh if you want, but one's sausage is important to many a man. A quick perusal of this topic reveals that I'm not alone. (You did notice the gender breakdown in that topic, didn't you?)

      Last weekend, while in the unfinished basement of a chef buddy, talk turned to our sausages, and before long we four charcuterie nuts were looking at our feet and commiserating about our failures. We shared a bond: our sausages had the better of us, and we knew it. Pathetic though it is, are you surprised that I felt a deep sense of relief, even of control, when I walked through my ten reasons? My metaphor afforded me a rare opportunity to feel superior to the process of sausage-making, and believe me, that doesn't happen often.

      My name is Chris A., and I have sausage anxiety.

      Read that list up there about my sausage maker, the instrument that I describe with distanced assurance. It's a ruse, I tell you. No matter how often I try to buck up, no matter how definitive a recipe, no matter how wonderful a pork butt or a lamb shoulder, when it comes to making sausages, I go limp with worry.

      Can you blame me? Look at all the places you can screw up, where your sausage can fail you utterly and leave you in tears.

      You grab some wonderful meat, hold it in your hands, appreciate its glory. Chill. You grind it, add some fat, and sprinkle some seasoning, whatever the flesh requires. Chill again. Slow down, contemplate the moon or something. You paddle that meat to bind it, melding flavor and texture seamlessly. Chill some more. What's your hurry? Toss a bit into a skillet, ask: are we ready? and adjust as needed. Stuff away. Then relax. If you can.

      I can't. You need to keep things cool to take care of your sausage, and it's challenging to stay cool when I'm all a-flutter about the prospect of a culminating, perfect, harmonious bind. If you read the books and you watch the shows, everyone acts just about as cool as a cucumber. But that's not real life with my sausage.

      It's a frenzy, I tell you. I know I should chill and relax, but I get all hot and bothered, start hurrying things along, unable to let the meat chill sufficiently, to take things slowly. Hell, I'm sweating now just thinking about it.

      I have to admit that I don't have this sausage problem when I'm alone in the house, have a couple of hours to kill, and know I won't be disturbed. I just settle in, take it nice and slow, not a care in the world, and everything comes out fine. But with someone else around, forget about it.

      Despite this mishegas, my wife is as supportive as she can be. She humors me patiently about these things, gently chiding, "Slow down! The house isn't on fire. It's just your sausage." Though I know she loves me despite my foibles, that sort of talk just adds fuel to that fire -- I mean, she can speak so glibly because it's not her sausage we're worrying about.

      Even if I am I able to relax, the prospect of sudden, precipitous sausage humiliation comes crashing down upon me. Think of it. All seems to be going so well -- a little too well. I'm keeping things cool, making sure that I'm taking it easy, following the plan step-by-step, trusting my instincts. I smile. I get cocky.

      And then, the frying pan hits the fire, and within moments I'm hanging my head: instead of forming a perfect bind, my sausage breaks and I break down. I want a firm, solid mass, and I'm watching a crumbly, limp link ooze liquid with embarrassing rapidity.

      Given my gender, in the past I've tried to subdue sausage anxiety with predictable contrivances: machines, science, and technique. If there's a tool or a book useful for perfecting my sausage, I've bought or coveted it. I calculate ratios of meat, salt, cure, sugar, and seasonings past the decimal; I measure out ingredients to the gram on digital scales; I poke instant-read thermometers into piles of seasoned meat; I take the grinder blade to my local knife sharpener to get the perfect edge. (We've already covered the stuffer above, of course.) I've got a full supply of dextrose, Bactoferm, and DQ curing salts numbers 1 and 2. The broken binding of my copy of Michael Ruhlman's Charcuterie has xeroxes and print-outs from eight other sources, and the pages are filled with crossed-out and recalculated recipes.

      It's the sort of thing that I used to do when I was younger: arm myself with all things known to mankind and blast ahead. It hasn't helped. I've learned the hard way that my hysterical masculine attempt to master all knowledge and technology has led, simply, to more panic and collapse.

      There is, I think, hope. I'm older, and my approach to my sausage has matured. I'm in less of a hurry, I roll with the challenges, and when the house is on fire, I just find a hydrant for my hose.

      If things collapse, well, I try to take the long view, recall the successes of my youth, and keep my head up. I mean, it's just my sausage.

      * * *

      Chris Amirault (aka, well, chrisamirault) is Director of Operations, eG Forums. He also runs a preschool and teaches in Providence, RI.
    • By Tara Middleton
      Alright so as of a few months ago, I decided to take an impromptu trip to Europe--mostly unplanned but with several priorities set in mind: find the best food and locate the most game-changing ice cream spots on the grounds of each city I sought out for. One of the greatest, most architecturally unique and divine cities I have visited thus far has gotta be Vienna, Austria. But what in the heck is there to eat over there?! (you might ask). 'Cause I sure as hell didn't know. So, I desperately reached out to a local Viennese friend of mine, who knows and understands my avid passion for all things edible, and she immediately shot back some must-have food dishes. Doing a bit of research beforehand, I knew I had to try the classic "Kasekreiner". Please forgive my German if I spelled that wrong. But no matter how you say it- say it with passion, because passion is just about all I felt when I ate it. Translated: it basically means cheese sausage. Honestly, what is there not to love about those two words. Even if that's not necessarily your go-to, do me a favor and give it a shot. Trust me, you won't regret it. A classic Austrian pork sausage with pockets of melty cheese, stuffed into a crisp French Baguette. No ketchup necessary (...and as an American, that's saying a lot). YUM. Best spot to try out this one-of-a-kind treat?! Bitzinger bei der Albertina – Würstelstand. Now here's a shot of me with my one true love in front of this classic Viennese green-domed building-- Karlskirche. Now, go check it.
       
       

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...