Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create a free account.

Risotta

Kitchen Scale Recommendations (2003 – 2010)

Recommended Posts

One of my scales is a Salter 4001 (it's not on that page but here's a photo: click). Like the other Salter scales, it's attractive and it works very well. It's also overpriced, too large, and the readout is too close to the platform. Which is why whenever I need to weigh something in the kitchen I use my cheap little postage scale and the Salter stays in the cabinet.


Steven A. Shaw aka "Fat Guy"
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just go to OfficeMax and get a potal scale -- they're electronically the same but less expensive to buy. This one is 30 bucks, has 1-gram gradations, tare, and metric/English, plus the readout is nice and far from the platform. Also check on eBay.

This link is dead due to a cookie.

Might you provide a bit more info? I'm interested in this.

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sorry about that:

Sunbeam

Digital Programmable 5-lb. Postal Scale

Item # 20073778 , Style # SP5

Thanks.

I'm going to make a trip to OfficeMax this week & take you up on this.

Best.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's really helpful to be able to remove the weighing platform for cleaning. This information is not always explicit in product descriptions, unfortunately.

Accuracy is how, well, accurate it is -- if you put a one-pound weight on it, does it show one pound on the read-out? If it doesn't, what's the margin of error? (What is never disclosed is the accuracy across the measuring range, which is too bad, because it matters. Scales -- even digital scales -- are inherently non-linear.)

Precision is how small an increment (e.g., 1/10 of an ounce, or 0.25 grams) it can weigh with a given accuracy.

I think. If that's not what they mean, that's what they should mean, because they're what's important. IMHO.

So what do you use in your kitchen?

I, too, have a Salter 4001, which is how I know all the stuff I mentioned (and for which Fat Guy criticized it) is important!

I will say that I didn't pay full price for it, though.

Fifi, I knew that you knew what accuracy and precision were. :wink:


Dave Scantland
Executive director
dscantland@eGstaff.org
eG Ethics signatory

Eat more chicken skin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5-lb. Postal Scale

Oh.

Another important thing is capacity. For what I do (cook for a family of five, with occasional dinner parties), five pounds is not enough. I think the Salter I have goes up to seven, and even that's not sufficient for breaking down a pork shoulder or a whole brisket.

Whatever tare you use counts against the total capacity of the scale (at least on mine, it does). for instance, if you use a glass bowl or measuring cup as a container, it can easily weigh close to a pound, cutting your five-pound capacity by 20%.


Dave Scantland
Executive director
dscantland@eGstaff.org
eG Ethics signatory

Eat more chicken skin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For weighing individual dry ingredients to be used in baking, 5-7 lbs is plenty. It's not enough if you're going to weigh large cuts of meat or if you're going to do multiple tares on the same bowl as you add the ingredients (which is how professionals do it). Either way, I'm still partial to the postage scales (if you have to go up to a 10lb just be prepared to pay double) because they seem to be better value for a given level of features (I assume a lot more of them are manufactured). And really, check eBay before buying one of these -- kitchen or postage.


Steven A. Shaw aka "Fat Guy"
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the Salton Aquatronic which has been satisfactory except for going through batteries at the wrong time. Perhaps those models with lithium batteries would have an advantage.

I like Dave's suggestion to be able to remove and clean the weighing platform. Mine doesn't and I simply cover it with a piece of Saran which pretty much becomes invisible. As I didn't buy it for its looks, that's ok but if I had gotten one of those cool looking ones, I'd be annoyed. I wonder though about the glass platforms. If broken, can they be replaced?


"Half of cooking is thinking about cooking." ---Michael Roberts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FWIW, my Salter weighs up to 11 lb., and if I'm not mistaken, down to .5 grams, which has proven sufficient to my needs. (I used a postal scale for years, once the rates went up, and a replacement chip to calculate postage was so much $$ that I relegated it to the kitchen, but it had a lot of nooks and crannies that were impossible to get flour...and worse...out of.)

Another thing I really like about that scale is that it takes up NO space in the kitchen. I have countertop "issues", and I lean it up against the fridge, where it takes up about as much space as a child's handprint.


"Laughter is brightest where food is best."

www.chezcherie.com

Author of The I Love Trader Joe's Cookbook ,The I Love Trader Joe's Party Cookbook and The I Love Trader Joe's Around the World Cookbook

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Salter 4001 apparently has 5 lbs capacity and the 1001 has 11 pounds capacity with precision declining as weight goes up (0 - 2kg x 2g, 2kg - 5kg x 5g, 0 - 5lb x 1/8oz, 5lb - 11lb x 1/4oz).

Now here's an independent review site where they take scales very seriously:

http://www.digitalscale.com/ -- "The Scale Experts"

And I think given all the arguments they make for it this is going to be my next scale:

http://www.digitalscale.com/6001t.htm

It's made by this company:

http://myweigh.com/

According to the reviewers: "The only bad thing that we can say about them is that they have driven the scale market into the ground with their low cost / high quality scales."

Their take on Salter: "The only bad thing about Salter is that they concentrate more on design then they do accuracy. This is because for most kitchens, the "look" of the scale is much more important then the accuracy. Salter scales are therefore not recalibratable and not very accurate but they do look really cool!"


Steven A. Shaw aka "Fat Guy"
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Colors.

Thanks, FG.

Guess I'm not going to OfficeMax this week.

Any other suggestions before I order/pick up a scale? :laugh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends what you want to do with your scale. I've had my cheapo office-supply-store scale for something like 9 years and I've rarely exceeded its capabilities. Not to mention, I think I've only had to change the battery once (ask anyone with a Salter how many batteries you'll burn in 9 years!). If I spend 2-3 times as much on a superior scale I'll probably only push its limits once or twice a year. And many cooks would never, ever exceed the capabilities of a 5-pound postage scale. I doubt I'll buy a replacement scale until such time as I break this one or go into a reallly obsessive baking phase. But when it's time to buy, I know what I'm going to get, or at least where I'm going to go for information. Either that, or I sell an article on scales and get free product samples!


Steven A. Shaw aka "Fat Guy"
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This site might help you, lots of reviews and opinions:

Digital Scale Opinions

I have this one and I love it.

I like that it can weigh up to 11 pounds and has the tear feature (a must have for a scale). Also that it weighs grams and ounces in case I want to do some serious baking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It depends what you want to do with your scale.

Not a lot, I think.

One of my goals for fall/winter is to work more on baking--breads, tarts, & whatever else I happen upon.

I don't have a kitchen scale.

The My Weigh looks to be about $50.

If the opinion is that it's worth the extra $20 over the Sunbeam postal scale, I'll pick up the My Weigh. (For some reason, I don't feel like researching this. I'll trust--and not question after purchase :smile: --whatever the recommendation is here.) Make sense?


Edited by MatthewB (log)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just go to OfficeMax and get a potal scale -- they're electronically the same but less expensive to buy. This one is 30 bucks, has 1-gram gradations, tare, and metric/English, plus the readout is nice and far from the platform. Also check on eBay.

This link is dead due to a cookie.

Might you provide a bit more info? I'm interested in this.

Thanks.

Hit refresh and you should see the page.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not an expert on this subject, but... I picked up a digital Terrailon a few years ago very cheaply and have been happy with it. I've heard about the postal scale recommendation before. If you go that route and have other things to buy at Office Max, I have a $10-off coupon for a $50 minimum purchase that I can give you on Thursday. Re the My Weigh, this site has them discounted ($38-40 for the 3001, $43-45 for the 6001). The My Weigh looks cooler and can be recalibrated.


Gene Weingarten, writing in the Washington Post about online news stories and the accompanying readers' comments: "I basically like 'comments,' though they can seem a little jarring: spit-flecked rants that are appended to a product that at least tries for a measure of objectivity and dignity. It's as though when you order a sirloin steak, it comes with a side of maggots."

 

-The mosque is too far from home, so let's do this / Let's make a weeping child laugh.

    Nida Fazli, poet, 1938-2016 (translated, from the Urdu, by Anu Garg, wordsmith.org)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, F-G. I have a scale on my list of cooking needs too, so I checked the price on one of their merchant links and the 3001T is under $50 shipped ground UPS. The 6001T that weighs to 13 lbs. is only $5 more. Black or white (3001 or 6001) is about $2 less. Looks like this should do it, unless someone has found something negative about these.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm no expert and I haven't researched this as exhaustively as I would if I was going to write about it for a magazine, but that 6001 unit looks really, really, really compelling at first blush. If it can be had for under $50, I'll go with that as my top pick for an advanced amateur cook or someone who plans to migrate in that direction. But I think a <$30 digital postal scale is a respectable choice for a casual cook on a budget. As I said, I have one and haven't felt particularly limited by it. Yet if I had no scale and had to make a purchase today I'd go with 6001.


Steven A. Shaw aka "Fat Guy"
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is the scale I use. I had another kitchen scale that wasn't quite repeatable but this one is dead on each and every time. I have a mass set to check it with and it tests out perfectly. The only potential drawback is the 4.4 pound capacity, but that hasn't seemed to have hindered me. For lighter work I have a scale that has a capacity of 2.2 ounces and a resolution of 0.0002286 ounces (obviously not designed specifically for kitchen work!) I have, however, used it when doing some experimenting with coffee roasting.

--------------

Bob Bowen

aka Huevos del Toro

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have both this Salter, the one with the square glass platform, and a mechanical Salter that's maybe 30 years old. And I've used the Salter Aquatronic.

I'm not entirely thrilled with the electronic one. But for some facets, I love it. If I had to get another, this is what I'd look for:

  • the longest possible time it can sit idle before it shuts itself off (mine is too quick to go)
  • the largest capacity; you never know when you need to weigh 10 pounds of tomatoes for sauce
  • the smallest possible increment (this is just for work use, though, where I need to go as small as 1 gram)
  • the most accuracy, natch
  • largest readout, that won't be obscured by any container on the platform
  • tare feature, natch
  • metric and US measures, and an easy-to-get-to way to switch between the two
  • a platform I can easily wipe clean. I don't care if I can remove it, because I almost always have what I'm weighing in some sort of container, the better to prevent inadvertent cross-contamination.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve used an AccuLab for many years. It has a readibiity of 1 gram but the minimum weight it will display is 2 grams. When I've looked at other scales with the same readibility, it’s usually been difficult to determine the minimum weight without trying them. Some have not displayed a weight of less than 5 grams, even with a 1 gram readibility.


Bouland

a.k.a. Peter Hertzmann

à la carte

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use the Aquatronic by Salter. It has worked very well for me for 2 1/2 years without a new battery. I use it everyday almost. (Because I do not work weekends, it gets a break then). Granted it is not the scale we had in the bake shop, but for what I do it seems to be functional so far.


It is good to be a BBQ Judge.  And now it is even gooder to be a Steak Cookoff Association Judge.  Life just got even better.  Woo Hoo!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going to FG's Sunbeam postal scale tomorrow or Monday. Any last words?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Similar Content

    • By kostbill
      Hello.
      I would like to buy some pectinex ultra sp-l.
      However I am worried about the temperature during the shipping time.
      I read that the storage temperature should be between 2 and 8 C. It works best from 15 to 50 C, and if it stays a lot of time in 25 C, it will gradually be deactivated.
       
      It needs a week to come here (Greece), then will it affect its abilities?
       
      Do you know if I can find a document somewhere that explains the gradual loss of power as a function of time and temperature?
      Did you have any experience with pectinex not working well due to bad storage?
       
      Thanks.
    • By Galchic
      Hello, folks, thanks for reading.
       
      My husband thinks, I should start selling my popcorn seasonings (which I make for my family), it’s a good product. But I'm not sure if it’s interesting to other people... So, what do you think, guys?
       
      Our story: 
      We’ve bought an air popper machine, but popcorn came out pretty tasteless. Then, we’ve bought different “popcorn seasoning” mixes... But it always ends with all the seasoning at the bottom of the bowl. Then, we've added butter, oil and so on before seasoning...  we got soggy, chewy popcorn. Lot’s of disappointments…
       
      When we almost gave up… the magic happened! I figured out the way to make seasonings that:
      Stick to popcorn, but not sticky to fingers (or T-shirt  , Easy to apply, May be pre cooked in bulk and stored… And popcorn appears crunchy, tasty, thoroughly covered with seasoning.  
      Sounds good, yep? Now, when I want to treat myself  - I only need 2 mins to turn tasteless popped popcorn to a real treat.  
      The only moment - it request 1 extra effort: after you toss it over popcorn, you need to microwave it for 1 min, and stir after.
       
      So, I was wondering, if you like popcorn like myself - would this seasoning be interesting for you to purchase? Are you ready for a little extra work (microwave & stir) in the goal to flavor popcorn, or it feels too much effort?
       
      As I have no experience in manufacturing and retail, your answers would help me to make a very important decision - to dive in or not... 
       
      Thanks in advance for your answers, it means the world to me.
       
    • By lindaj1
      Is there any recipe from the modernist universe or any other galaxy to make ketogenic (low carb) puff pastry and strudel type doughs?  Unusual ingredients OK.  There must be a way...
    • By haresfur
      I got to thinking after the disgusting job of separating globs of fat from sous vide short ribs and debating never doing them that way again. If the fat renders out in a braise, but not in the sous vide, what temperature would you need to turn the fat liquid to get rid of it? Is it below well-done or do you really have to cook the shit out of it? Is it just temperature or a time&temperature thing?
       
      Along those lines, what happens with marbled, tender cuts? where is the sweet spot between solid fat and something more palatable?
    • By Daily Gullet Staff
      By John Sconzo

      The Daily Gullet is proud to present this, the first in a multi-part, front-row report on the recent "Spain and the World Table" conference. Watch for subsequent installments in this topic.

      In his introduction of Ferran Adria, Thomas Keller -- perhaps the most celebrated American chef ever -- described four elements that go into making a great chef. The chef must be aware. Once aware of one’s culinary and other surroundings that chef can then be inspired, which leads to the ability to interpret those surroundings. But a great chef does not stop there. Instead, the great chef continues to evolve. Ferran Adria, perhaps more than any other chef who has ever lived, is the embodiment of those four elements.

      The moment that Ferran Adria strode towards Thomas Keller on the stage at the CIA/Greystone’s World of Flavors’ “Spain and the World Table” Conference was electric -- as if a giant Van de Graf generator had been turned on. The feeling didn’t subside when Adria took the stage from Keller; it only became more pronounced as the packed crowd rose to its feet, raining applause, admiration and love on the Spanish master. Adria accepted the response with aplomb, and gave it right back to the audience -- and to his fellow Spanish cocineros, who were standing off to the side. He brought each one up to join him on the stage for a rousing thank-you to the conference organizers, sponsors and participants. Once this emotional release subsided, Adria got down to what everyone had been waiting for -- his discussion and demonstration.

      Ferran Adria, with eyes sparkling like the finest cava, began speaking Spanish in a voice as gravelly as the beaches of the Costa Brava, while Conference Chairman Jose Andres translated. The crowd, hushed and straining for every word, moved forward in their seats as Adria explained El Bulli and himself, with a lesson in recent culinary history thrown in. Ferran explained that El Bulli is not a business. While offshoots of El Bulli are operated on a for-profit basis, the restaurant runs without profit as a primary motivation. For example, he said, the greatest difficulty they have is distributing reservations. Given the extraordinary demand and the severely limited supply, he explained that they could simply raise the price of a meal to the point where the supply and demand met. Indeed, the price of a meal at El Bulli is in itself quite reasonable given the stature of the restaurant and well within means of most motivated diners should they be able to get there, and this is how Adria prefers it. He stated that he was not interested in cooking solely for those with the most money. He prefers to work for people with a true interest in exploring the limits of cooking with him. To this end he showed a short film depicting “A Day in the Life . . .” of El Bulli set to the Beatles’ song of the same name. The film showed a couple’s response to the experience.

      Ferran’s voyage into creativity began with a visit to Jacques Maxima at Le Chanticleer Restaurant in Nice, France. He learned from Maxima that to be creative is not to copy. This idea changed his entire approach to cooking -- from making classic cuisine to making his own. Aware of elaborate books of French cuisine, Adria resolved to catalogue his work, the results of which are the richly detailed El Bulli books, published by period. These books, as wonderful as they are, are huge and extremely expensive. During his presentation, Adria announced -- and demonstrated -- that the individual dishes photographed and described in a chronology within each book are all now available online at elbulli.com.

      He finished the philosophical discussion by talking about the general style of haute cuisine that he and others are engaged in. While others have coined the term “molecular gastronomy” to highlight the scientific component of the creativity involved, Adria rejected it, saying that all cooking is molecular: most of his techniques are in fact rather simple and don’t employ radical new technology. Most of the technology that they do use has been around for some time; they have simply adapted it to their own purposes. Nevertheless, he applauds contributions to gastronomy from Harold McGee and other food scientists, and welcomes their collaboration in the kitchen. He has yet to find a term that describes the movement: as of now, he feels that there really is no good name for this style of cooking.

      More than any other single thing, Ferran Adria is known for the use of “foams” in cooking. While he is proud of his achievements with foams, he stressed that while appropriate in some circumstances, the real utility of foams is limited. He bemoans their ubiquity -- and wishes to not be blamed for others’ poor deployment of the concept. In the course of describing this and other techniques, Adria made a point of stating that using them should not be inferred as copying. Techniques and concepts are to be used and shared. He invited everyone to learn and harness whatever they found interesting, and to employ it in to their own pursuits.

      Another set of techniques discussed and demonstrated by the master and his assistant, Rafa Morales from Hacienda Benazuza, included three types of spherification. These included the use of calcium chloride (CaCl) and sodium alginate as well as the converse, and exploration of a new agent, gluconodeltalactone. The original combinations of alginate into CaCl for “caviar” production, and CaCl into alginate for larger “spheres” have chemistry-related limits as to what can be sphericized. In private correspondence, Harold McGee explained to me that Adria described encapsulating a mussel in its own juice. While this would make the dish technically an aspic, unlike conventional aspics it remains a liquid. Adria said that though gluconodeltalactone is very new, and they are just beginning to get a handle on it, he is very excited by it. He also demonstrated a machine for spherification on a larger scale than they had originally been able to do, as well as liquid nitrogen and freeze-drying (lyophilization) techniques. At the conclusion of his demonstration -- and thus the Conference -- the audience once again awarded him a standing ovation.

      While Adria’s appearance was the culmination of the conference, the energy it produced was not just because of his stature in the world of gastronomy -- it was also due to the excitement generated by the conference that preceded it. If there had previously been any doubt, Thomas Keller’s welcome of Adria was a clarion: Spanish cuisine has landed on North American shores and is finding a niche in the North American psyche. Spanish cuisine -- in its multifaceted, delicious entirety -- lives here, too.

      + + + + +

      John M. Sconzo, M.D., aka docsconz, is an anesthesiologist practicing in upstate New York. He grew up in Brooklyn in an Italian-American home, in which food was an important component of family life. It still is. His passions include good food, wine and travel. John's gastronomic interests in upstate northeastern New York involve finding top-notch local producers of ingredients and those who use them well. A dedicated amateur, John has no plans to ditch his current career for one in the food industry. Host, New York.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...